+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 137

Thread: About the perspective

  1. #101
    Quote Originally Posted by Celani View Post
    I know but the dev's said more then one time that there's not going to be 1st person and people keep arguing what is better... and it will never stop since opnion is personal.
    So since they already stated that it's going to be only 3rd person people should stop complaining
    Well I guess the thread is redundant then and should be moved to off topic
    Joust in RL, Homeopath, Nutritionist and Dance Flamenco and Salsa

  2. #102
    Quote Originally Posted by Zulhar65 View Post
    Well I guess the thread is redundant then and should be moved to off topic
    me too since it's not going anywhere...

  3. #103
    Personally I prefer the 3rd person, and especially for M&B. 1st person feels too choppy, which I dont like very much . I would prefer being able to choose between both, im sure that 1st person players will just end up complaining that I can use 3rd to my advantage, but thats their own fault.

  4. #104
    Field Marshal Destraex's Avatar
    Achtung PanzerHearts of Iron IIINaval War: Arctic CircleSemper FiSword of the Stars II
    Mount & Blade: WarbandMount & Blade: With Fire and SwordWar of the RosesWar of the Vikings

    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    2,554
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Zulhar65 View Post
    Thats a little over board. No where did Destraex say he wont play WOTR, he has been a big contributor to these forums. I guess he just prefers 1st person over 3rd. Its like ice cream I love vanilla over chocolate, if there is no vanilla i will happily eat chocolate.
    Exactly Zhulhar65. I have never said I will not play it. I am just expressing my opinion in the hope that maybe some day we will see a game like what I want or even have these devs add it at a later date.
    If people do not like it they generally try to shut it down. Nothing new really
    "The King is dead, long live the King"
    "A horse! a horse! my kingdom for a horse!"

  5. #105
    Can I just say in response to those making the case that a first-person viewpoint is less realistic, whatever the truth in that or lack thereof, the reason people want first-person isn't realism but rather immersion which is an altogether much more important thing in a game.

  6. #106
    Second Lieutenant Knight852's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIKing Arthur IIMount & Blade: Warband

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    136
    At the end of the day the devs decide what view to put in, some people want 1st person others 3rd either way one is being put in game and if the devs have time/think its important enough they might add the other choice in.

    Point is stop arguing over whats better and wait till the game is out, you can't say what is better when you haven't used it/seen it in game.

  7. #107
    Well on that basis you may as well shut down all discussion. What the devs have decided to put in or not doesn't invalidate discussion about the relative merits of any other possibility. If it does for you just avoid entering the thread.

  8. #108
    Second Lieutenant Knight852's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIKing Arthur IIMount & Blade: Warband

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    136
    I'm not saying this thread is invalid, what I'm saying is in-game 3rd person might be better then 1st person. Or 1st might be better then 3rd person until the game is out and officially released no one can say what view would be better, more realistic, cooler ect ect, most peoples views are based on other games that use 1st or third person, I'm not saying anyone is right or wrong but even the people who took part in the alpha can't really say as they don't know what it will be like when there are more people playing.

    Hopefully when the beta is out we can use more ranged weapons THEN people will be able to truly say what they prefer for this game as one of the views might be better then on other games similar to war of the roses

  9. #109
    Private Ekky's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIMount & Blade: WarbandMount & Blade: With Fire and Sword

    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Stavanger, Norway
    Posts
    19
    It would be nice to have the choice between 1st and 3rd person, everyone has a different play style. When i play Mount and blade as a infantry man or a cav i often sit in 3rd person
    mostly because its i see more of the fight and enjoy the animation and the fighting more. when i chose to go an archer i walk around in 3rd person and go into 1st so i get less activity on my
    screen and more concentraiton on the player i have chosen to send a arrow to..

    i think having both is a nice thing to have so everyone can chose what they want

  10. #110
    Quote Originally Posted by Ekky View Post
    It would be nice to have the choice between 1st and 3rd person, everyone has a different play style. When i play Mount and blade as a infantry man or a cav i often sit in 3rd person
    mostly because its i see more of the fight and enjoy the animation and the fighting more. when i chose to go an archer i walk around in 3rd person and go into 1st so i get less activity on my
    screen and more concentraiton on the player i have chosen to send a arrow to..

    i think having both is a nice thing to have so everyone can chose what they want
    You can see from the videos that when you use a bow or ranged weapon that the perspective changes from 3rd to 1st person. If you like ranged weapons I think you will really enjoy WOTR system.
    Joust in RL, Homeopath, Nutritionist and Dance Flamenco and Salsa

  11. #111
    Second Lieutenant Knight852's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIKing Arthur IIMount & Blade: Warband

    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    England
    Posts
    136
    In the videos, when the people play as the longbowman you can see his head when he loads another arrow were as when the person is a crossbowman you can only see his hands and weapon, so I presume that as a crossbowman you go fully into first person although I could be wrong but as an archer you are still in third person, the camera is just very close to your characters head

  12. #112
    Quote Originally Posted by Robin. View Post
    It's a completely different type of game, but zenoclash was pretty awesome in that respect

    It even has grappling and stuff.
    This looks like it might be the deal when it comes to first-person medieval combat.



    Oh noes, did I just do that?

  13. #113
    KING OF PIE ilikepie's Avatar
    Hearts of Iron 2: ArmageddonCrusader Kings IIDeus VultEU3 CompleteDivine Wind
    For The GloryHearts of Iron IIIHearts of Iron III CollectionHOI3: Their Finest HourHeir to the Throne
    Europa Universalis III: In NomineMarch of the EaglesEU3 Napoleon's AmbitionVictoria: RevolutionsRome Gold
    SengokuVictoria 2Victoria II: A House DividedVictoria II: Heart of DarknessRome: Vae Victis
    Mount & Blade: WarbandWar of the Roses500k clubEUIV: Call to arms eventEuropa Universalis IV

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    1,715
    That game looks way better than war of the roses ty for showin meh

  14. #114
    Private Ekky's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIMount & Blade: WarbandMount & Blade: With Fire and Sword

    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Stavanger, Norway
    Posts
    19
    pffft it doesnt look bether.. besides this game reminds me of that source game age of chivalry

  15. #115
    Quote Originally Posted by Ekky View Post
    pffft it doesnt look bether.. besides this game reminds me of that source game age of chivalry
    It's a follow on from Age of Chivalry.

    Looks good to be fair, (and because I'm a grown up and wear big boy pants there won't be an issue with me buying both WotR and the new Chiv game.)

  16. #116
    It does look pretty nice. Mite well get it too, a bit gory for my taste and of course its first person :-p. But it is a medieval combat game and you cant have too many of them! Not sure the historical accuracy people will like it much though, I'm sure I saw a guy with a chain mail hood getting cleanly decapitated at one point.

    I wonder if there are people on there forums campaigning to have a optional third person perspective introduced? :-p
    Last edited by WhichDoctor; 14-07-2012 at 18:37.

  17. #117
    KING OF PIE ilikepie's Avatar
    Hearts of Iron 2: ArmageddonCrusader Kings IIDeus VultEU3 CompleteDivine Wind
    For The GloryHearts of Iron IIIHearts of Iron III CollectionHOI3: Their Finest HourHeir to the Throne
    Europa Universalis III: In NomineMarch of the EaglesEU3 Napoleon's AmbitionVictoria: RevolutionsRome Gold
    SengokuVictoria 2Victoria II: A House DividedVictoria II: Heart of DarknessRome: Vae Victis
    Mount & Blade: WarbandWar of the Roses500k clubEUIV: Call to arms eventEuropa Universalis IV

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    1,715
    It's not worse than war of the roses for accuracy, and the animations all look way better. In the clip you can see a guy getting hit and starting to stumble, then the other guy bashes him with his weapon till he falls down, awesome. I'll probably buy both anyway.

  18. #118
    WOW! Chivalry is looking SO much better now than it was just a couple of months ago. Will be getting both games regardless and I'll decide for myself which is better/my favorite.

  19. #119
    Personally I don't think it's a case of which is better. I think both games offer a different experience of a multiplayer melee game. My real enjoyment when playing comes from PvP and I think it's good to see more of these skill based melee games coming out.

  20. #120
    KING OF PIE ilikepie's Avatar
    Hearts of Iron 2: ArmageddonCrusader Kings IIDeus VultEU3 CompleteDivine Wind
    For The GloryHearts of Iron IIIHearts of Iron III CollectionHOI3: Their Finest HourHeir to the Throne
    Europa Universalis III: In NomineMarch of the EaglesEU3 Napoleon's AmbitionVictoria: RevolutionsRome Gold
    SengokuVictoria 2Victoria II: A House DividedVictoria II: Heart of DarknessRome: Vae Victis
    Mount & Blade: WarbandWar of the Roses500k clubEUIV: Call to arms eventEuropa Universalis IV

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    1,715
    The biggest thing that bugs me in war of the roses is the bad animations, the blocking and swinging seem worse than the original mount and blade

+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4 5 6 7 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts