Closed Thread
Page 20 of 24 FirstFirst ... 10 18 19 20 21 22 ... LastLast
Results 381 to 400 of 480

Thread: Can we have some real info on release date/development state?

  1. #381
    Mwahahahahaha s1234567890m's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IICommander: Conquest of the AmericasDeus VultEU3 CompleteDivine Wind
    Hearts of Iron IIIHearts of Iron III CollectionHeir to the ThroneKing Arthur IILost Empire - Immortals
    MagickaNaval War: Arctic CircleSemper FiSengokuSword of the Stars
    Sword of the Stars IISupreme Ruler: Cold WarVictoria 2Victoria II: A House DividedWarlock: Master of the Arcane
    V2 AHD BetaHearts of Iron: The Card GamePride of NationsCK2: Holy Knight500k club
    Europa Universalis IVEUIV: Wealth of NationsEUIV: Conquest of Paradise

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    3,162
    Quote Originally Posted by Buladelu View Post
    The problem has nothing to do with graphics and system requirements etc. Interface design and color choices don't require big money or system requirements. I don't like Dwarf Fortress but I agree thier interface is consistent. It looks like nothing and minimalistic while MMtG looks like something bad and bloated with unnecessary images and isn't more accessible.
    so yeah, should we try it before we base how assesible it is by watching a video?
    Ignored: Nuril, videonfan, Pandi

  2. #382
    Forefather Earl Uhtred's Avatar
    Achtung PanzerCrusader Kings IIDarkest HourDeus VultEuropa Universalis 3
    Divine WindHearts of Iron IIIHeir to the ThroneEuropa Universalis III: In NomineEU3 Napoleon's Ambition
    Victoria: RevolutionsEuropa Universalis: RomeVictoria 2Victoria II: A House DividedVictoria II: Heart of Darkness
    Rome: Vae VictisPride of NationsHoi 2 Beta500k club

    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Pub Bigot / World Citizen
    Posts
    6,223
    Quote Originally Posted by Buladelu View Post
    The problem has nothing to do with graphics and system requirements etc. Interface design and color choices don't require big money or system requirements. I don't like Dwarf Fortress but I agree thier interface is consistent. It looks like nothing and minimalistic while MMtG looks like something bad and bloated with unnecessary images and isn't more accessible.
    This. The idea that everyone who criticises the interface is some sort of 13 year old ADHD tard demanding bleeding edge quality graphics is nonsense. Graphics may not matter much to most of us (personally the last thing I played was SMAC) but interface absolutely does.

    The Shadow of Man 406 - 1095 - Rules

    Contribute to 'Concert of Europe', an 1815 mod for Victoria 2

    .

  3. #383
    Colonel Buladelu's Avatar
    Cities in MotionCrusader Kings IIVictoria 2Warlock: Master of the ArcanePride of Nations
    Rise of Prussia500k clubEuropa Universalis IV: Pre-order

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Minsk, Belarus
    Posts
    1,123
    Quote Originally Posted by Earl Uhtred View Post
    This. The idea that everyone who criticises the interface is some sort of 13 year old ADHD tard demanding bleeding edge quality graphics is nonsense. Graphics may not matter much to most of us (personally the last thing I played was SMAC) but interface absolutely does.
    True. Look at old game screen like Heroes of Might and Magic 2.



    You have worm, attractive colors. You can clearly say what's interactive and what's not. You have buttons that are all in the same style and they're very simple, so you instantly memorize and recognize them. Interface have decorative elements but you never mix them with active elements.

  4. #384
    The Heroes of might and magic screen describes my feeling quite well too. However, if it's not possible to add or change it at the moment I accept that without any problems.

  5. #385
    It is quite remarkable how quickly this thread jumped to the highest frequented topic on MM subforums as soon as this interface discussion started.

    Many users have made rather bold statements regarding the general looks, structure and accessibility of the interface.
    Some even went that far to state that Magna Mundi will not be a succesful game because of the looks.

    I totally disagree. The majority of players I know that enjoy plaing strategy games simply doesnīt give a shit on graphics.
    Why do you think people still play Warcraft 3, Starcraft and Age of Empires 2?
    Because these quality games just have such an extremely good gameplay that their age doesnīt matter.
    The same thing is true for EU3 (+expansions), EU2 and even games such as freeciv and the Settlers 2.

    Thus far I have never heard that a strategy gamer buys his games because off nice fonts and good looking maps.
    What matters to the strategy gamer is balance, complexity and in the case of single-player games AI behaviour. Everybody hates dumb AI that needs to cheat or have unfair advantages in order to be able to handle the player.

    What is true is that this game fills a rather small niche. But within this niche Magna Mundi will have its impact. Trust me, grand strategy games will change because of MM!

    So, lets have a look at this youtube video...
    I watch it in HD and fullscreen.
    What I notice is that the person capturing the video probably didnīt use the perfect equipment for doing so. The screen slightly blurs when he moves the mouse. I also doubt that this video was taken with maximum settings since anti-aliasing sometimes appears to not work properly and the gameflow is shortly interrupted at the beginning of each month which indicates that the machine MM is run on possibly is a bit too weak already.

    General looks:
    First thing I notice is that the water is too dark (has already been stated by officials that they are aware of the problem).
    Zommed out map looks ok. Borders look like borders on real maps. I like them but their colour is too similar to the colour of rivers.
    Zommed in map looks much worse. Especially the cities and ports somewhat disturb me. Colors might need some adjustement too. Some of them are very bright.
    -> Easy improvement possible here: Adjust colours.

    The interface:
    Whoa, there is a LOT of information on the interface. Exactly as any grand strategy gamers wants it to be. General overview on the top. Additional ledgers can be displayed. Thats fine.
    Some guys on the right, probably diplomats and spies. I hope they are important otherwise this is wasted space.
    Mini-Map on the lower right is unnecessary and hopefully can be hidden. Mapmodes are important though. The icons are small but thatīs good since you wonīt need them permanently.
    On the lower left the chat (?) is hidden. Thats ok.
    On the upper left the most important policy settings can be accessed quickly and your countries flag is shown.
    -> Conclusion: The interface is highly functional. Hopefully some parts of it can be hidden if it is necessary to clear it up. Especially when observing an ongoing battle almost the entire screen is covered by pop-ups and icons. Thatīs a little bit too much on one screen then.

    My impression is that with some minor refinement the looks of MM will be good enough to be no reason for not buying this game.

  6. #386
    Colonel Buladelu's Avatar
    Cities in MotionCrusader Kings IIVictoria 2Warlock: Master of the ArcanePride of Nations
    Rise of Prussia500k clubEuropa Universalis IV: Pre-order

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Minsk, Belarus
    Posts
    1,123
    Quote Originally Posted by Coincollecter View Post
    It is quite remarkable how quickly this thread jumped to the highest frequented topic on MM subforums as soon as this interface discussion started.

    Many users have made rather bold statements regarding the general looks, structure and accessibility of the interface.
    Some even went that far to state that Magna Mundi will not be a succesful game because of the looks.

    I totally disagree. The majority of players I know that enjoy plaing strategy games simply doesnīt give a shit on graphics.
    Why do you think people still play Warcraft 3, Starcraft and Age of Empires 2?
    Because these quality games just have such an extremely good gameplay that their age doesnīt matter.
    The same thing is true for EU3 (+expansions), EU2 and even games such as freeciv and the Settlers 2.

    Thus far I have never heard that a strategy gamer buys his games because off nice fonts and good looking maps.
    Welcome to the club of missing the point.

    Games you mentioned have perfect interface. Think about other games. There're still people who play Starcraft 1. There're ones who play Warcraft 2. Nobody plays Warcraft 1. It had similar to WC2 graphics but in it you could only select 4 characters at a time and (not sure, but I think so) you must click move and set destination instead of RMB click. That's the power of interface. SC2 has very similar to SC1 interface but modern graphics and SC1 still has great fanbase. I'm sure For the Glory is a great game, but it has pause on pause/break key and not on space and also all those mapmodes you have to change constantly to actually do something. That is a bad design requiring unnecessary actions, not oldschool graphics. When I see MMtG has Marine Trade screen element and it just shows you a picture and you only get info if you move mouse to it and wait for context help I smell bad uninformative design and become sad cause I propably couldn't enjoy gameplay because of it.

  7. #387
    Banned k_merse's Avatar
    Europa Universalis 3Europa Universalis III: In NomineSupreme Ruler 2020Victoria 2500k club
    EUIV: Call to arms event

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Budapest, Hungary
    Posts
    1,474
    The funniest part is that you only saw a 15 minute gameplay video and did not see actual pictures about the interface, but everyone cries wolf already What you forget is that MM is developed by players. We all played grand strategy games, then worked on a mod, then started to develop our own game. We know how functional an interface has to be. Maybe you'll need a bit time to get used to the flow of information, but this acclimatization time won't be longer than with any other new game. And that's why the Manual and the Tutorial exist.
    Of course there is always a possibility that our thoughts about clear and effective information acquirement differs from yours and that some of you may have some difficulties to get the necessary information at first. But we're all humans, we're different. I personally can get any information necessary very easily and quickly from the GUI, so for me it is ideal. But I repeat, it is possible that for some of you there could be better or (for them) easier solution to get what they want.
    But I can assure everyone that after an acclimatization phase, everyone will be able to handle the game fast and effectively.

  8. #388
    Aὐτοκράτωρ Konstantinos XV's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIEU3 CompleteDivine WindFor the MotherlandHearts of Iron III
    HOI3: Their Finest HourHeir to the ThroneMarch of the EaglesEuropa Universalis: RomeSemper Fi
    Victoria 2Victoria II: A House DividedVictoria II: Heart of DarknessRome: Vae VictisCK2: Holy Knight
    500k clubEuropa Universalis IV: Pre-order

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Konstantinstadt
    Posts
    738
    Quote Originally Posted by Buladelu View Post
    When I see MMtG has Marine Trade screen element and it just shows you a picture and you only get info if you move mouse to it and wait for context help I smell bad uninformative design and become sad cause I propably couldn't enjoy gameplay because of it.
    Err. I see an anchor-index across the element. Which would probably be enough once I feel comfortable with the mechanics. How is a thorough pop-up window a deficiency again?



    The vast majority of the rest feels just like weird taste-based nitpicking. How are EU3-style "heads" (subject of a fascinating gag in the "Why EU3 is the Worst Game Ever" AAR) aesthetically superior to the ones we get in MM? Not enough textures in the "empty spaces"? The windows shown from 2:40 refute the claim. The icons are mostly quite sharp. More detail on/through the political map-mode is a very nice idea, but the current political map-mode is in no way a game-breaker. And so on.

    Having given the video a few more goes, the only additional stuff I could've pointed out are various buttons on the provincial map-mode - they probably don't look sharp enough. Particularly the disguised X in the upper right and build navy/fleet. And rivers/borders similarity has already been mentioned.

  9. #389
    I can't wait for MM, been looking forward to it since it was announced and I want it to be released in the best possible state, which is why I'm offering a suggestion for a quickfix to the UI.



    Regards
    Beans
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	wxEAJ.png‎
Views:	22
Size:	433.2 KB
ID:	54713  

  10. #390
    Field Marshal Cybvep's Avatar

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    8,342
    I think that Beans gave an excellent and practical suggestion. The UI on the right is cleaner, darker and should fit the game well.

  11. #391
    Špekulant
    A Game of DwarvesCrusader Kings IIDungeonlandEU3 CompleteLeviathan: Warships
    MagickaEuropa Universalis: RomeWarlock: Master of the ArcaneWar of the RosesHearts of Iron: The Card Game
    Knights of Pen and Paper +1 Edition500k clubEuropa Universalis IV: Pre-order

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Prague
    Posts
    1,243
    Quote Originally Posted by Buladelu View Post
    When I see MMtG has Marine Trade screen element and it just shows you a picture and you only get info if you move mouse to it and wait for context help I smell bad uninformative design and become sad cause I propably couldn't enjoy gameplay because of it.
    Have you actually played any Paradox Interactive games? Because you know absolutely nothing about the effects of Minimal Church Tax law in the CK2 until the pop-up shows up. On the other hand, you have the Marine Trade adjustment in MM with a slider and a clearly differentiated effects in the picture. It's as informative as any slider in EU3 if not more. You don't even need to have built-in numbers there because they are showed in the pop-up when you adjust the slider.

  12. #392
    People do not want the Faction strength and moral in color? Interesting, because when a faction's strength is in green, you can tell at a glance that is better then if it was yellow or red.

    I'm still listening to both sides of this UI discussion, however it seems to me that some will not be happy unless the MM UI is a clone of Paradox's other titles. We will not do that, however, as I said we are still watching the discussion and may make some changes based on the feedback given. No promises either way.

    I do like the idea of reducing the hue a bit (proposed by Bean?) - however things such as the faction strength/moral colors will need to keep their effectiveness.

  13. #393
    Colonel Buladelu's Avatar
    Cities in MotionCrusader Kings IIVictoria 2Warlock: Master of the ArcanePride of Nations
    Rise of Prussia500k clubEuropa Universalis IV: Pre-order

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Minsk, Belarus
    Posts
    1,123
    Quote Originally Posted by myLAAN View Post
    Have you actually played any Paradox Interactive games? Because you know absolutely nothing about the effects of Minimal Church Tax law in the CK2 until the pop-up shows up. On the other hand, you have the Marine Trade adjustment in MM with a slider and a clearly differentiated effects in the picture. It's as informative as any slider in EU3 if not more. You don't even need to have built-in numbers there because they are showed in the pop-up when you adjust the slider.
    The problem is that picture is complex and big. It's just not needed. You see those characters we use to communicate? They are simple and easily remembered and recognizable. That way we can quickly understand them and our brain does it automatically. When I see Minimal Church Tax I see where it's situated on a scale no tax - big tax, I can quickly get it. Even if that picture is interactive and changes my brain will take time to remember how bad is it - is it bad? Is it worst or just slightly worse than normal? After several hours of play my brain would wan't to dive into the game and things like those will constantly remind me there's a thick wall of UI between me and the game.


    Quote Originally Posted by Zolotaya View Post
    People do not want the Faction strength and moral in color? Interesting, because when a faction's strength is in green, you can tell at a glance that is better then if it was yellow or red.

    I'm still listening to both sides of this UI discussion, however it seems to me that some will not be happy unless the MM UI is a clone of Paradox's other titles. We will not do that, however, as I said we are still watching the discussion and may make some changes based on the feedback given. No promises either way.

    I do like the idea of reducing the hue a bit (proposed by Bean?) - however things such as the faction strength/moral colors will need to keep their effectiveness.
    Hue idea is right. As I've said earlier, background is too bright so fonts and action buttons kind of blend. And green/red font aren't bright enough, people with slight color blind will have problems (like with red/green * in EU3).

    Paradox titles aren't exactly things anybody should make an example to copy anyway

  14. #394
    Quote Originally Posted by Zolotaya View Post
    People do not want the Faction strength and moral in color? Interesting, because when a faction's strength is in green, you can tell at a glance that is better then if it was yellow or red.

    I'm still listening to both sides of this UI discussion, however it seems to me that some will not be happy unless the MM UI is a clone of Paradox's other titles. We will not do that, however, as I said we are still watching the discussion and may make some changes based on the feedback given. No promises either way.

    I do like the idea of reducing the hue a bit (proposed by Bean?) - however things such as the faction strength/moral colors will need to keep their effectiveness.
    My suggestion was just for the background panel images of UI only, Obviously the foreground string colours should stay as is. As a budding developer myself I understand how much of a pain the UI can be, I already offered to this suggestion and my help on the paradox subreddit, I have a lot of free time this week so I would love to have a crack at reworking the background UI panels for you in a way that you would not have to move anything around or change positioning, just replacing the UI images.

    I only speak for myself but the UI at the moment is too colourful, and has way too much going on. The game looks fantastic, but the UI violates intergalactic law with the sheer amount of different vibrant tones. It's a simple fix though, by just lowering the saturation. But it does mean it has to be done to all the UI elements one by one, and by the same amount.

  15. #395
    Špekulant
    A Game of DwarvesCrusader Kings IIDungeonlandEU3 CompleteLeviathan: Warships
    MagickaEuropa Universalis: RomeWarlock: Master of the ArcaneWar of the RosesHearts of Iron: The Card Game
    Knights of Pen and Paper +1 Edition500k clubEuropa Universalis IV: Pre-order

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Prague
    Posts
    1,243
    Quote Originally Posted by Buladelu View Post
    When I see Minimal Church Tax I see where it's situated on a scale no tax - big tax, I can quickly get it.
    You get nothing. It's absolutely useless to know where it is on a scale if you do not know the actual effects. What's more, the steps between the laws are not linear, unlike in a slider of Merchant Marine. The slider gives more control over what you can do and that's the only thing that's important.

    Quote Originally Posted by Buladelu View Post
    After several hours of play my brain would wan't to dive into the game and things like those will constantly remind me there's a thick wall of UI between me and the game.
    If you can't remember after several hours of gameplay what one of the most important modifiers does, it's not the problem of UI. In fact, to extend this thought to other elements, the portraits on the right are redundant and could look all the same because after several hours, you will know in what position which missionary/spy/whatever is.

  16. #396
    On Probation thrashing mad's Avatar

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Polska
    Posts
    2,603
    I'll second Beansontoast. UI of CK2 and Vicky 2 is sleek and elegant because it is ergonomic, not necessarily because it is well made artwork. Backgrounds contrasts with the fonts, and interface elements consists of 2 main colours (wood+old paper in Vicky, Dark Gray marble+old paper in CK2). That way eye instinctively focuses on most standing out (abd most important) elements such as icons and text, rather than distracting backgrounds. Desaturating colours, and limiting UI background elements to two main themes/colours should do wonders.

  17. #397
    Field Marshal James The 1st's Avatar
    Cities in MotionCrusader Kings IIDeus VultEU3 CompleteDivine Wind
    Hearts of Iron III CollectionHeir to the ThroneLead and GoldVictoria: RevolutionsSword of the Stars
    Victoria 2Victoria II: A House DividedVictoria II: Heart of DarknessMount & Blade: Warband500k club
    Europa Universalis IV: Pre-orderEUIV: Call to arms eventEUIV: Wealth of NationsEUIV: Conquest of ParadiseEUIV: Res Publica
    Crusader Kings II: Legacy of RomeCrusader Kings II: Sword of IslamCrusader Kings II: Sunset InvasionCrusader Kings II: The RepublicCrusader Kings II: The Old Gods
    Crusader Kings II: Sons of AbrahamCrusader Kings II: Rajas of India

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Dallas TX, USA
    Posts
    2,823
    How can you guys be complaining about the UI icons so much when you haven't even used it? Any UI is confusing rubbish until you actually learn what it means.

  18. #398
    Sellsword Troll Descri's Avatar
    Crusader Kings IIDeus VultEU3 CompleteDivine WindFor the Motherland
    Hearts of Iron IIIHOI3: Their Finest HourHeir to the ThroneMagickaSemper Fi
    SengokuSword of the StarsSword of the Stars IIVictoria 2Victoria II: A House Divided
    Victoria II: Heart of DarknessMount & Blade: WarbandMount & Blade: With Fire and SwordCK2: Holy Knight500k club
    Europa Universalis IV

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    C'naan
    Posts
    429
    I actually like the original look better, but it'll help a lot IMO if you give a black border or "edgeline" to the letters of the colored faction descriptions.
    You must unlearn what you have learned

  19. #399
    Why not waiting until release to try it out yourself and *then* discussing the issue? So far, I like what I see but it's not really that I care all that much. Design follows function. Better tell me about the features. Been playing strategy games since the mid 80s, so nothing can really shock me.

  20. #400
    Second Lieutenant Blaze86420's Avatar

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by Beansontoast View Post
    I can't wait for MM, been looking forward to it since it was announced and I want it to be released in the best possible state, which is why I'm offering a suggestion for a quickfix to the UI.



    Regards
    Beans
    Holy, huge improvement. I honestly have no problems with the UI style at all, or the map for that matter. Only a couple of minor issues that I've mentioned before:
    -Thinner borders, and make provincial ones especially subtle.
    -Change the water back to the old plain EUIII style, or make the present one a lot less dark. It's super dark right now, and it just clashes it everything pretty bad.
    -Make the UI less flashy and bright, don't change the icons or style at all, that's fine and obviously there is no time to do that now. Just make the colors less saturated and bright, that's all.

    DO NOT CHANGE THE COLOR-CODED FACTION STRENGTH AND HAPPINESS, I don't understand why anybody would want that changed, I want to know things with a single glance and the colors help.
    Last edited by Blaze86420; 24-05-2012 at 01:54.
    Nationality: Canadian
    Culture: Anglo-Canadian/Mashriqi
    Religion: Sunni
    Ideology: Liberal
    Trade Policy: Free Trade
    Economic Policy: Interventionism
    Religious Policy: Pluralism
    Citizenship Policy: Full Citizenship
    War Policy: Anti-Military

Closed Thread
Page 20 of 24 FirstFirst ... 10 18 19 20 21 22 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts