I'm definitely for Rome II. Not that I won't enjoy EUIV a ton, its precedence over a sequel to Rome was a let-down. When I first glanced at the announcement for the new CKII expansion with the headline mentioning Rome, I got really excited and thought it was alluding to an early dark age scenario where one could try and save a crumbling Rome or take up the mantel of barbarian kings in transition to more feudal-like states.
Regardless, once republics are added into CK, which I surely thought was coming before this Byzantine-centered expansion, it won't be tooooo big a leap for Paradox or modders to create a roman bookmark. Perhaps that's just wishful thinking, as tribal mechanics would need to be considered as well, though I have full confidence in this community's creativeness and the mod-ability of Paradox games to include that - but I would gladly pay full game price for it.
edit: grammar
Regardless, once republics are added into CK, which I surely thought was coming before this Byzantine-centered expansion, it won't be tooooo big a leap for Paradox or modders to create a roman bookmark. Perhaps that's just wishful thinking, as tribal mechanics would need to be considered as well, though I have full confidence in this community's creativeness and the mod-ability of Paradox games to include that - but I would gladly pay full game price for it.
edit: grammar