Has anyone else considered using this particular type of gender laws to start up an female-driven dynasty? Is it, strategically speaking, useful at all? I ask because it SEEMS pretty lucrative -- once enacted you can give fiefs to both genders (castles, cities, even bishropics(!)), meaning you effectively double the number of available candidates to choose from.
On the other hand, you're restricted to (starting as) Basque, at least until conquering other realms. And you ruler never seems to inherit anything since every other realm uses male inheritance. Oh, and the court is still for the most part male-only, so you don't increase candidates in terms of court positions.
I'm just wondering if the trade-off is worth it, or if I'm missing any other hidden perks/penalties that comes with this type of gender law.
On the other hand, you're restricted to (starting as) Basque, at least until conquering other realms. And you ruler never seems to inherit anything since every other realm uses male inheritance. Oh, and the court is still for the most part male-only, so you don't increase candidates in terms of court positions.
I'm just wondering if the trade-off is worth it, or if I'm missing any other hidden perks/penalties that comes with this type of gender law.