Opinion often defended but which does not make any sense since the people working on 1933/1914/1936 scenarios and those working on WW2 scenarios (1939, 1940, etc) are not the same.
But wouldnt creating a new 1912 scenario binding resources that slow down the improvements of the existing?
And if as i understand it, it is parted in the 2 different groups you listed, 1912 and 1933 would be in the same group?
Indeed.
It's like the habit of saying "humanity should focus on preventing climate change instead of curing AIDS" without realizing that solving these two problems have nothing to do with each other.
harsh comparison, i was just talking about to set priorities