• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
anyhoo, i think i will try to put together a bogus analysis in a few hours. so, if it happens, everyone will be amazed at my deductions.
 
Brutal people do not exist in this timeline.
 
No, my mother was walrus. My other mother was a hamster.
 
Also I think as GM I should clarify that "Apprentice Seer" means "Formerly Unclaimed, was previously claimed by a seer."

I don't get why that needs clarification at all :p
Though of course apprentices could also *start* as claimed .. :)
 
I don't get why that needs clarification at all :p
Though of course apprentices could also *start* as claimed .. :)

I am unsure why there was confusion - perhaps because I am coloring claimed apprentices cyan, rather than lime? There certainly is no way to tell whether apprentices started attached or unclaimed from what I've put up, but that wasn't in question.
 
He said it in a ghost post though... Did he mention it prior? I thought he was just messing but if not that seems like a fairly clear rules violation tbh.
I was just messing, based off who I'd voted that day. But if the GM thinks it's a bit too much I'll go back and delete it.
 
Only at the weekend

In the flat next door lives a transvestite,
He's a man by day and a woman by night :p

[video=youtube;bc80tFJpTuo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bc80tFJpTuo[/video]

It had to be done