It doesn't matter if you didn't read what he wrote, your motivation remains the same: aim the spotlight away from yourself and your packmates.
Observe: there are three unknowns who voted the_hdk, the other three were goodies. There are four unknowns who voted for Yakman, plus two evil and two good. There are five unknowns who voted for Bagricula, and one evil.
We know equal amounts about the_hdk and Yakman voters, as half of the voters' identities are revealed. We know the least about the Bagricula voters.
There are fewer unknown among the_hdk's voters than among Yakman's, and we can infer from the limited numbers that the_hdk was not voted up by Yakman's pack to save him. Even if all three are packmates of Yakman (and I know for a fact they're not, obviously, as I am one of the three, so at best two of them are Yak's packmates) that is a small pack for a Big that started with 34 players. And if all three are Yakman's packmates, surely at least one would move to try help Yak. And if all three are not Yakman's packmates, it becomes even stranger that they would diffuse their vote so much when two votes would make all the difference.
It is wrong to say that with 50% of the_hdk voters confirmed as goodies that means we're likely to find baddies among the remainder. The reverse is actually true when you consider the votes on Yakman and Bagricula. We know that Yakman was a yellow wolf, and was voted on by a red wolf (EUROO7) and we know that Yakman voted for Bagricula. Given that we know Yellow wolves were voting for Bagricula, and Red wolves (and a cultist) for Yakman, and that all identified the_hdk voters are good, the reasonable conclusion is that Red pack voted Yakman to save Red Wolf Bagricula, and Yellow pack voted Bagricula to save Yellow Wolf Yakman.
The most fertile ground right now is Bagricula's voters... starting with you.