If that's correct, I could understand a decision to just give Yakman up. It's hard to counter in the last hour or half hour without being conspicuous. Instead, I'd look at voting when Yakman first came into the spotlight, after he went to four votes with others at one or two. That's when any efforts to save him are more likely to have taken place.
But I'd have to have another look at the thread. It's hard to judge the pace of events when you're looking back at it in retrospect.
I haven't spent a lot of time looking at my vote vount so this will be sort of a stream of consciousness thing.
j-L gave Yak his first vote early, then randakar voted Yak because of his Proud trait*. You, Kiwi, gave Yak his third vote breaking a 2-2 tie with Adamus. Then enk made his strange statement about his Slinky vote and gave Yak 4 votes with one other person at 2 (Adamus).
Then in a short period of time-18 posts- (number of votes in parenthesis):
Lord_D voted hdk(1)
Kriszo voted falc(1)
Rocking voted Adamus(3)
Paendrag voted Bagricula(2)
walrus voted
Yakman(5)
rendap and falc voted hdk (2,3)
Pevergreen voted taiis (1)
Boris voted hdk(4)
esemess voted Adamus(5)
A bit later Nautliu gave Yakman vote #6 and I started advocating for Bags' death when I came on-line in the morning giving him a fourth vote.
walrus (post 512), Slinky (post 514)and Vainglory (post 517) made votes that look bad by either unvoting Yak or moving hdk into the lead.
euro, Yoshi and snoop effectively killed Yakman.
*Allegedly.
EDIT: Paendrag's vote against Bags at that point doesn't bother me much, he has been trying to kill him in a RP fashion all game, which is very common. Paen is tough to read because his votes are more based on RP than the game.
