-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Nepal was conquered early on by the British, while I was still an unciv. It's my plan to eventually liberate them, although getting my heavily populated cores takes precedence.
And yes, my poor armies are gonna get a lot more battered before this is over - but I'm just a few months away from muzzle-loaded rifles! The technology!
And yes, my poor armies are gonna get a lot more battered before this is over - but I'm just a few months away from muzzle-loaded rifles! The technology!
I just updated an hour ago! I may have time again tomorrow night (it's past midnight here), but it's not certain.
"... and we only lost 10000 men" ... Where did I heard that before ? 
Let's see if you can hold the fort until the muzzles get around. So far only pyrric victories
Let's see if you can hold the fort until the muzzles get around. So far only pyrric victories
10,000 casualities? All worth it when you use the thunderbolt like tactic to gain the upper hand on higher ground!
In the Grim Darkness of the 19th century, there is only massive amounts of people being killed over tea.
10:17 is not a good ratio when defending in the mountains. I do hope you get better dicerolls soon.
I expected the final panel to just be a scene of mangled troops bleeding to death, a poignant reminder of th futility of war.
10,000 casualities? All worth it when you use the thunderbolt like tactic to gain the upper hand on higher ground!
"... and we only lost 10000 men" ... Where did I heard that before ?
Let's see if you can hold the fort until the muzzles get around. So far only pyrric victories
This is a matter of both consternation and, oddly, triumphalism. The 19th century is a tough place. Especially when its wars are fought with 18th century weapons.
I don’t understand what you mean. Their arms are clearly always there and always have been.Where do their arms go when they aren't brandishing them?
I’ll try (at least as long as I’m able)!
I’d need at least two panels for that...
Last edited:
Actually if the Panjabi cassualties were lower, the war wouldn't be so epic/patriotic :nods:
Dalip really is getting both ruthless and cynical ... one could say the perfect statesman?
I know that Panjab has moved on, but I'd love to see the humiliation poster from Britain. Mmmmmm.
oh, and peasant hunting, let's not forget that noble, ancient institution.
... and we only lost 40000 soldiers True, the brits are bleeding more than you, but really, this is WW I level casualties .
But atleast we won !
True, the brits are bleeding more than you, but really, this is WW I level casualties .But atleast we won !