• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
The 1921 Primaries: A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing​

The primaries leading into the 1921 electoral year were marked by a frantic bid for legitimacy from the Frente Nacional. After five years of functional exile, the Frente had managed to emerge from the darkness of the post-coup underground movement and into the light once again. However, the Frente Nacional was still far from mainstream. Worse still, at a much smaller than ever before meeting of the Executive Committee of the Frente, the remaining party leaders realized that the Frente still not have enough support to field a candidate. Ever devious, the ultra-nationalist leaders of the party devised a scheme to garner the broad support needed to seriously run in the Presidential election: they called the Republicanos.

Like the Frente Nacional, the Republicanos were suffering from an even more severe lack of leadership. "The conservative has become a rare beast," one Republicano leader declared at a sparse conference in April. "The radical left seems to have taken the nation for its own." Thus, when the delegation from the Frente Nacional arrived to propose an alliance, the Republicanos stopped and listened. The Frente proposed a mutually beneficial coalition: a merger of the two parties that would allow the Frente to shake off the stigma of the fascist dictatorship, while giving the Republicanos the support they needed to do the same. The leaders of the parties signed an agreement in a closed-door session.

By in large, the conservatives Republicanos were outraged, calling the merger a corruption of the party's principles. Meanwhile, the most radical members of the Frente voiced their concerns that the Republicanos would not be willing to do what it took to instigate a return to fascism. Nevertheless, the two needed one another.

Meanwhile, David Bevan won the FNT nomination with no contest at an early socialist primary, promising five more years of rule for the worker. The Comunistas promised the same thing - however, the rapid expansion of the party had come at the cost of unity, and the typically unified politburo split between two candidates. The Liberales' field favored Carlos Andonie once again, though several dark horses entered the race to dispute his de facto position as head of the party.


Primary Candidates




Liberales Candidate: ((Liberal/Radical, In Opposition))

Carlos Andonie III ((rudders10)) - Pro-Military/Secularism/Laissez-Faire/Free Trade/Full Citizenship [1+2+2+1+2=8]

Francisco de Santa Rosa ((Riccardo93)) - Anti-Military/Secularism/Laissez-Faire/Free Trade/Full Citizenship [2+2+2+1+2=9]

FNT Candidates: ((Socialist, Party of Power))

David Bevan ((WelshDude)) - Pro-Military/Secularism/State Capitalism/Free Trade/Full Citizenship [1+2+0+1+2=6]

Comunista Candidates: ((Communist))

Xavier Kvaratskhelia ((Suirantes)) - Pro-Military/Atheism/Planned Economy/Protectionism/Full Citizenship [1+3+3+0+2=9]

Ernesto Fernando Fuentes ((Maxwell500)) - Pro Military/Secularism/State Capitalism/Protectionism/Full Citizenship [1+2+0+0+2=5]

Republicano Nacional Candidates: ((Conservative/Reactionary/Fascist))

Gabriel Tottenheim ((thekinguter)) - Jingoism/Moralism/Interventionism/Free Trade/Limited Citizenship [0+0+1+1+1=3]

Sebastian Montenegro ((Ivir Baggins)) - Pro-Military/Secularism/State Capitalism/Free Trade/Full Citizenship [1+2+0+1+2=6]



-------------------------

Player Actions Needed:
I'm missing platforms for a lot of you. Riccardo, it's not even clear to me who your current character is - let me know.

As always, let me know if I've screwed something up or missed someone's candidacy. PM me your platform if I'm missing it.

There are four parties this election, so we're back to coalition voting.

No one is disenfranchised at the moment.

Here a sample ballots below.

Party: Liberales
Candidate: Andonie/((Riccardo93))
Coalition: With Republicanos Nacionales/Comunistas/FNT
Coalition Candidate:

Party: FNT
Coalition: With Liberales/Comunistas/Republicanos Nacionales
Coalition Candidate:

Party: Comunistas
Candidate: Kvaratskhelia/Fuentes
Coalition: With Liberales/FNT/Republicanos Nacionales
Coalition Candidate:

Party: Republicanos Nacionales
Candidate: Tottenheim/Montenegro
Coalition: With Liberales/Comunistas/FNT
Coalition Candidate:

I'll give this two days to vote, ending 10 AM PDT on the 12th.
 
Last edited:
I do not find the current amount of information on the platforms of the candidates to be satisfactory. Therefore, I will abstain from voting until the candidates' positions have been clarified.
 
Party: Comunistas
Candidate: Kvaratskhelia
Coalition: With FNT
Coalition Candidate: Fuentes


- Xavier Kvaratskhelia
 
With the merger of the Republicanos and the Frente National, I am leaving the Republicanos.

Juan Rivera - Minister of Foreign Affairs

Party: FNT
Coalition: With Liberales
Coalition Candidate:Bevan
 
I hereby request that the Candidates for the Chilean Communist Party officially state their positions on important issues. I am not going to make a decision before receiving this information.

- Admiral Caveo Kalambur
 
Party: Liberales
Candidate: Andonie
Coalition: No Coalition
Coalition Candidate:


It is with sadness that I see the Rerpublicanos have been taken over by the facists. While it may cost me electorally, I can state now that I will NEVER go into a coalition with them and refute their pathetic claims to legitimacy.

Once again I stand for the Liberales. An economy run by the people who know it best, not by Government, free trade to boost jobs and secularism as the government should stay out of religion. Everyone should have the same rights and I have always supported full citizenhip. We must maintain our armed forces, both at land, sea and air and I am therefore pro military.

Carlos Andonie
 
My platform:

Jingoism/Moralism/Free Trade/Interventionism/Lim Citizenship.

I seek a coalition with the Liberales, so my economic policy is up for negotiation. My religious and military views are not. Also I sugest a name change: Christian Democrats, National Conservatives or Falange seem good names

Party: Republicanos Nacionales
Candidate: Tottenheim
Coalition: Liberales
Coalition Candidate: Tottenheim

Why vote for a third way? Why vote for Gabriel Tottenheim? What do I have to propose? Well, I propose Free Trade and economic prosperity, while keeping our men employed in our army and a strong church to help the poor and the sick for a fair society.. I want to create a legitimate conservative faction in Chilean politics to counterweight the almighty radical left that has risen over the years. While I no longer consider myself a fascist, I proudly served in the army during my 18's and I worked as a bureacrat under the fascist republic. While I do not endorse the radical ideology of my peers, I am still proud of having served the nation in its golden age. I do not seek a return to autocracy, but rather a democratic return to conservativism. We must preserve our values and traditions, through the army and the church, for our society to maintain order. I also wish to stand up for the middle class, not only the professionals like the liberals do but also the military officers, bureacrats, artisans, clerics and small businessmen (bakers, tailors and such), in these times where society is slowly becoming exclusively for the capitalist corporate elite, professionals/executives and the proletarian masses. A vote for me is a vote for Chile!

Gabriel Tottenheim, Presidential Candidate.
 
Last edited:
I am pleased that the conservatives and the Frente Nacional have come to an agreement. Although I am still wary of pledging my complete allegiance to a fascist party, I am certainly drawn to their underlying values of moralism, jingoism, and a belief in the free market (although I am neither an economist, nor an experienced member of the financial sector and therefore would not be vehemently opposed to government interventionism.

I would also like to applaud Mr. Tottenheim on his plan to keep the church strong so that it may act as an alternative to a grand national welfare system. For now however, I feel that we should keep some sort of welfare system in place so that the church would not have a complete monopoly on the system.

With that said, I think I can cast my vote...

Party: Republicanos Nacionales
Candidate: Tottenheim
Coalition: Liberales
Coalition Candidate: Tottenheim


And one more thing...

Party name: Nacional Alianza
 
Thanks for your support Estavan, I am glad you finally decided to show up. And about the name, I can't choose one, as I'm stuck between the Christian Democrats, National Conservatives and Alianza Nacional/Nacional Alianza as they all seem good for the party. However I do not like Republicanos Nacionales at all and I believe we must change that.
 
Party: Comunistas
Candidate: Fuentes
Coalition: With FNT
Coalition Candidate: Fuentes


Also, my policies are Pro Military/Protectionism/State Capitalism/Secularism/Full Citizenship
 
My platform is not so different from my opponent, save for military policy.

I, Francisco de Santa Rosa, son of our esteemed former president Antonio de Santa Rosa, am a pacifist, though I would be willing to moderate somewhat for a stronger coalition. I also support secularism, or pluralism if need be, and fully support laissez-faire, free trade, and full citizenship.

I have always supported the ideal that made not only my father's, but President Gogolow and Rivera's, administrations so successful; compromise. As the Liberal candidate, I will work will all parties that coalition with us to make Chile more secure and prosperous.

A vote for Santa Rosa is a vote to return Chile back to the stability of the 1860's, back before the Germanistas, Andonists, and the Falangists rose up. A vote for me is a vote to bring the Republic to the principles that made it so great over the past fifty years, and a to make a freer, brighter future not only for Chile, but for the entire world.

((TH, my character is Francisco de Santa Rosa, and I support Laissez-faire, Free Trade, Full Citizenship, Pacifism/Anti-Military, Secularism/Pluralism))

My ballot is thus:

Party: Liberal
Candidate: Francisco de Santa Rosa
Coalition: Republicanos, FNT
Coalition Candidate: Francisco de Santa Rosa
 
Is Francisco de Santa Rosa the son of Antonio de Santa Rosa? If so, didnt he serve in the cabinet as minister of economy under Andonie and Zepeda? I am getting a bit confused here, with Francisco being so much like his father (rest in peace). I would gladly welcome a clarification.
 
My father served under Andonie, briefly, until the Broken Promises Coup occurred. He also served under Cortez and Gogolow. I only served under Rivera, I believe, as Treasury Minister before my prolonged Ambassadorship to Italy.
 
I second the calls for our Communista candidates to clarify their positions more, especially Señor Kvaratskhelia. My ballot until then is half empty.

Party: Communista
Candidate:
Coalition: With FNT.
Coalition Candidate:
 
Party: Liberale
Candidate: Andonie
Coalition: Republicano, FNT
Coalition Candidate: Andonie

As it stands. I might change my opinion on coalition later. Right now, I believe it is necessary to stop the rise of the Communists. I have no qualms against Socialism, in un ideological terms, but Communism brings with it a certain desire to undermine the Democracy we work through to become elected. We did not fight against a dictatorship to become controlled once again by an unsympathetic government. At the worst, we did not fight a revolution only to succumb to one again so soon.

Her illustrious country of Chile is great because of the mandate her people gives her. Chile para los chilenos.
 
Well, I propose Free Trade and economic prosperity, while keeping our men employed in our army and a strong church to help the poor and the sick for a fair society.
Gabriel Tottenheim, Presidential Candidate.

I assume you are suggesting no government intervention in the economy stronger than subsidies. I can tell you right now that subsidies do not work. Yes, they allow us to keep the factory open, but the factory needed subsidising for very important reason - nobody wanted to buy what it produced. Instead of subsidising we need to build new factories that do produce what people want at affordable prices. That way, we can keep Chilean workers working without every other Chilean paying their wages.

As for his church idea, why doesn't the government help the poor and sick? After all, non-Catholic people deserve help too, don't they?