The President and Army Chief of Staff have reached an impasse on the appointment of generals for the next term. The President has attempted to appoint his own generals without the Chief of Staff's consent, precipitating a Constitutional Crisis!
This is not a coup and there won't be any fighting. However, I still need the declarations of the incumbent military to see who they will side with during this crisis: will you accept the President's appointments without the Chief of Staff's consent or instead stand by the Chief of Staff?
Many of you are generals or ministers and I need your declarations Supporting the President or Supporting the Chief of Staff!
Recalling that in concordance with the 1896 Military Command Act, the President will have previously resigned his commission as general of the Army of the Republic, the general position of the Army of the Republic is vacant and automatically abstaining. Similarly, the capital stack will automatically abstain.
The President will win the right to appoint a general of every army supporting him (and a corresponding fraction of Chile's total brigades), while the Chief of Staff will gain the right for every army supporting him. Abstaining armies will be allotted between them based on the non-abstaining votes.
This crisis can also be defused by the following means: 1) The President and the Chief of Staff reaching an agreement on general appointments, 2) an act of the Congreso, or 3) (Something I've momentarily blanked on - there was a third way but I don't remember what it is.)
Additionally, if anyone can find the original statement of the Chief of Staff Act, that would be helpful. It was passed just after the 1866 Presidential Election, but as far as I can tell, it was never stated in the thread. Riccardo93, would you happen to have a copy floating around?
EDIT: Oh, and all soldiers and pops in Chile get a militancy and consciousness boost too.
This is not a coup and there won't be any fighting. However, I still need the declarations of the incumbent military to see who they will side with during this crisis: will you accept the President's appointments without the Chief of Staff's consent or instead stand by the Chief of Staff?
Many of you are generals or ministers and I need your declarations Supporting the President or Supporting the Chief of Staff!
Army of Northern Chile ((18 brigades (12inf 6art)) - Captain Rios ((Rudders10)) - CHIEF OF STAFF
Army of Patagonia ((18 brigades (10inf 6art 2cav))) - General Sebastian Hidalgo ((MastahCheef117))
Army of the Republic ((20 brigades (14inf 6art)) - Vacant - ABSTAIN
Reserve Army ((14 brigades ( 9inf 3art 2cav )) General Jesus Gonzales ((yourworstnightm))
Garrison of the Panama Canal ((8 brigades (5inf 3art)) - General Saez ((Seek75))
Navy and Marine Force((6 brigades (5inf 1art)) - Eduardo Alvarez ((Gloa))
Capital Guard ((18 brigades (12inf 6art))) - ABSTAIN
Recalling that in concordance with the 1896 Military Command Act, the President will have previously resigned his commission as general of the Army of the Republic, the general position of the Army of the Republic is vacant and automatically abstaining. Similarly, the capital stack will automatically abstain.
The President will win the right to appoint a general of every army supporting him (and a corresponding fraction of Chile's total brigades), while the Chief of Staff will gain the right for every army supporting him. Abstaining armies will be allotted between them based on the non-abstaining votes.
This crisis can also be defused by the following means: 1) The President and the Chief of Staff reaching an agreement on general appointments, 2) an act of the Congreso, or 3) (Something I've momentarily blanked on - there was a third way but I don't remember what it is.)
Additionally, if anyone can find the original statement of the Chief of Staff Act, that would be helpful. It was passed just after the 1866 Presidential Election, but as far as I can tell, it was never stated in the thread. Riccardo93, would you happen to have a copy floating around?
EDIT: Oh, and all soldiers and pops in Chile get a militancy and consciousness boost too.