• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Quite contrary, it is your opinion which is based on conjecture. Aircraft carriers have been around since the great war, but have not been ciritical in any naval action so far. The best they can do is trying to find the enemy before he finds our ships, thus giving us an advantage in positioning. Battleships however have been instrumental for naval warfare for centuries. They have proven their worth countless times already. That is why it is prudent to concentrate on them instead of wasting our scarce resources for ships of secondary importance.
 
* High command meeting

While it is true that the south front sees a temporary supply shortage, this HQ does not see the long term need of improved infrastructure in the south, so any investment there would be wasted.

While it is true that the army right now doesn't see the big need for huge numbers or extra troops (unless we get involved in an additional war while fighting in China), we will need some garrisons and military police to secure our gains, we estimate that we get an uprising every week if we don't, and getting one on our supply source would mean 50000 tons of supplies up in smoke.

Lets first see the short term strategy, while the northern armies nearly has reached their target, the 3 remaining southern Homengun will need around 3 month more to get to the central cities which should lead to the collapse of the KMT. However if the KMT loses too much territory without important cities they will call help from their remaining warlords. This is to be avoided if possible by minimizing the worthless countryside we occupy.
Our surplus Homengun will once wholly in Guangxi set target at Chongqing and Kunming, if the Guangxi are able to supply them they can support their attack on Changde.
If the KMT grows desperate and calls its remaining allies, ie. foremost Yunnan, our surplus Homengun will be in position to attack Yunnan from Guangxi and thereby cover their back which they would have left open.

Medium to Long term plans
Once China is subdued we are faced with 3 possibilities,
A) The USA is so pissed with us they declare war shortly after the fall of the Dragon.
B) War in Europe, either Germany attack the Czeck or Poland or UK attacks Germany. We can safely ignore it until Germany and the Soviet go to war.
C) All is quiet and we can continue our buildup.

Plan A - war with the USA, only marines and large amounts of garrisons are needed. A modern fleet 4CV+4BB+12CL just to hold their fleet from our shores, an emergency transport fleet to reinforce our holdings in case of invasions. Double that to defeat them.
Revised estimates for Plan B - attack on the Bolsheviks, we will need 8 Homengun to go any where and maybe 10 to complete any of the envisioned encirclements, 8 after that.
Plan D - Attack on the Dutch and British, 2 Homengun + marines + prodigious amounts of garrisons can finish them off in stages. Old CV's+BB's to keep the British at bay.
Plan I - Attack on India, 3 Homengun are needed to make any progress, add one if Guangxi is not with us.
Plan X(except a pure Plan B) - all DD, CVL and old CL on ASW duty or we bleed to death, this also requires all tech with the ASW in them to be researched.

The army had hoped to make a 13th inf attack Homengun, ie. excluding cav, gar and mar, for these contingencies but the current guess at our resources would not allow this. After finishing the gar+mp the remaining divisions that are missing a support unit will get that then we stop any army expansion for now.

However we will still need to build a H.Ftr at all times, the army estimates we will need 12 fighters total in late '41, 3 against each of USA, Soviets, British and 3 reserve/repairing. These only gives air cover against enemy actions any bombing will have to be done by the LB's, as the HB, MB and Nav will have low effect at that time. We are faced with an option of rebuilding the MB, HB and Nav to LB or keep them around until we get to not just Greater power but Superpower status if that ever happens.

It was the army's thought that the navy would keep a reserve of CaG to replace heavy loses on their carriers and which also doubled as ASW and other support operations when not needed by the navy.

Now to infrastructure projects, ignoring Plan B+C for now, the only useful new build we can make in preparation for Plan A+D is an emergency airport at North Palau, which covers is the only part of the pacific we can't reach from any other airport. Plan I would require 2 extra levels of infrastructure in the province just north of Rangoon.
Plan C will need some improvements of rails from Shanghai north and west to support operations, the same improvements are also needed by Plan B. The first part of the route is the same for the north and west rail west from Shanghai to Nanjing should be improved to level 7 all the way, the next part is the northwest rail to Peking where it at first need to be improved to level 6 all the way.

Plan B will require lots of infra structure improvements in addition to the ones needed for Plan C before start of hostilities, we will need to extend the westward rails to the western Chinese border, level 6 the first half way, then level 5. A further rail will be needed as a branch from the Nanjing-Peking one, through the former commie provinces to the Mongol border, this one should be at least level 4 and the trunk need to be 7 till this point. In addition the Toyohara harbour will have to be improved to maximum level to supply the northern troops.
That is around 60 provinces that needs to be improved an average of 2 times or 120 times of 3 months of 1.75IC, 630IC months, luckily we have 3+12+6=21 month to finish it so we only need 30IC per month for that project *runs off to pray for good weather at the nearest Shinto Temple* the side effect is we need less supplies as we can transport more cheaper.
After start of hostilities Ulya will need to be improved to level 5 (any combination of 20 port levels in the north should do if Toyohara isn't at max level). A lot of Mongul provinces will need to be improved, sadly the vaunted trans-sibirian railway wont help us before we pass Irkutsk and then the west China rail will take more and more pressure and will need a running upgrade.

When building rail its important that we don't get misled by the apparent high need near the supply source as we get a lot of false need due to the none fulfilment of requirements at the far end. Instead find the weakest links and improve the one of those that is nearest the source. So it doesn't help that Shanghai is level 10 if there is a level 2 on the way to the front. if a supply line split the trunk before that need to be 1 better generally, but the true formula for supply throughput seems to be level*level*10 for occupied, double that if its home country.
The level 3 provinces in Manchuria can therefore transport 3*3*10*2 or around 180 per province in a 3 wide column that is around 500 supplies that max. can pass Manchuria so a level 6 from Shanghai should be more than enough as Manchuria also can be fed by many harbours.

Raillines of Japanese China.
railines3.jpg

Requires no puppets created.

So in the ideal case the army would need around 45 IC for construction, 32IC for infra(30IC for rail+2 for Toyohara) and 13IC for a H.Frt. until mid '41. Which is a bit problematic as the total construction budget is 40IC for army+navy last month. On the other hand most of our construction sites are still Chinese occupied so its not so pressing.

Proposed budget:
Current budget but
7th art and 1 Rikusenshidan postponed to more prosperous times.
Priorities
BB Yamato 11IC
CVL XXX 7IC (at half the total IC to a CV, this looks like an viable alternative, even if it cost double the supply).
4 Sentou H.Ftr 13IC
3rd AT (no restart) 2.5IC
8th art, restarted with different arts until all units have support. 2.5IC
5 x 2 garx2 when finished 4xMPx2 then replaced with infra 7.5IC
CL 8IC - navy need at least one of these per capital to avoid penalty. (trivia, if simultaneous building 2BB(21IC) and 3CVL(21IC) the navy would need 3 2/3 CL(30IC) and 1 CAG(10IC) just to keep up)
infrastructure in China + Toyohara (up to 32IC)

If the impossible should happen and we get more IC than the projected we can prepare for the different Plans
5 Garx2 for Soviet ports, 2xMPx2 for soviet oil,very roughly 20 garsx2 for Dutch ports, 4xMPx2 for Dutch/British oil that is not on ports, 1xMPx2 for Kuala Lumpurs metal, we wont bother with the rares!!! (before we go in deficit with them), very roughly 10xgarx2 for USA harbours in the pacific.
5 Garx2 for Philippines (if we don't puppet them)

Supplies and convoys, could the clerk in charge of supplies stop the convoy to our mainland supply source port when it exceed 20K supplies, Qingdao might not do anything useful at that point either, he can leave the others on. This will hopefully average out the supply need a little.

Politics, once we have raised our national unity to over 70% we need to strengthen the organisation of our ruling party so we can make collaborative governments in occupied areas, in the moment we can chose between get many partisans and get nothing, which is about the same for resouces, collaboratory should give us around 30% of the resources.
Remove any minister with +resources, we wont need them from now on.

Research
remove rares from research list, we will drown in them now.

Army orders:
Shanghai Ichigun, once Nanjing falls take the 2 adjacent VPs.
Canton II hold the line, remember to keep a continuous line to the coast. reduce to 1 Homengun
Canton I attack direction Changsha, take over 1 Homengun from Canton II, remove one to Guangxi.
Peking HQ, attack from Jinan toward Baofeng, but hold the line in the north, do not take Shanxi.
 
*High Command Meeting

Dear Admirals and Generals,

It can be misleading to just look at the map and assume that if we have 1-lvl airports nearby, we can provide proper air support to our armies and fleets. Same goes for provinces with poor infrastructure, as they will greatly hamper R&R. The importance of air power cannot be ignored - it is not a coincidence that in places where proper air support can be provided, our advance is much faster than in other areas.

It seems that General Surt sometimes gets carried away with daydreaming and ignores facts. Gentlemen, we need to face the reality honourably - our industry is nowhere near strong enough to fulfil all our needs. We cannot hope to start massive infrastructure projects, increase our army and air force in size and build heavy capital ships at the same time. Period.

The Army was right when it assumed that additional CAGs will form a reserve, but the question is, what is the purpose of this reserve when we are at war with China, a country with no navy and with low quality airforce? Airplanes can be built much quicker than ships, especially the large ones - currently a carrier takes ~2 years to complete and a battleship takes much more than that (ATM 2 years and 8 months, although this is before the completion of Yamato). It should also be noted that the Chinese may stop us with two things only - numbers and logistical difficulties.

A bigger army means greater supply requirements. It also means that we need more officers and NGOs. These men should be used to support our operations in China.

It is good that General Surt pointed out the need for cruisers. I want to remind you all that our shipyards had little experience in building them so far, which will most likely mean that the first orders will be particularly expensive.

My negotiations with Admiral Baltasar are progressing slowly, which means that we should create a plan for the several next months only and revise it in 1940, when the situation in China will become more clear. Therefore, I think that the plan for the remaining months of 1939 and the first months of 1940 should look as follows:

1. Formation of new naval infantry divisions will be halted and one new CVL will be ordered. It is expected that its construction will take ~18 months.
2. Construction of new CAGs will remain suspended for the moment.
3. Construction of IJN Yamato will be finished in July 1940. This will provide our shipyards with much-needed experience in construction of such large vessels, which should reduce the construction time of future battleships. No new BBs or BCs will be ordered before IJN Yamato is finished.
4. At least one new CL should be ordered as soon as possible.
5. No new infantry divisions will be formed.
6. Only 1-2 ART/AT/AA should be in production at the same time.
7. Research-wise, we should make the improvement of our military doctrines a top priority. This may improve the quality of our forces without putting a greater strain on our industry. This concerns all branches of the military. We should invest heavily in ASW, too.

BTW Surt, if you look at the screenshots, you will see that we have already established a collaboration government in China.
 
Last edited:
My negotiations with Admiral Baltasar are progressing slowly, which means that we should create a plan for the several next months only and revise it in 1940, when the situation in China will become more clear.
Agreed.

1. Formation of new naval infantry divisions will be halted and one new CVL will be ordered. It is expected that its construction will take ~18 months.
Agreed.

2. Construction of new CAGs will remain suspended for the moment.
Agreed, though I would like to point out that the surplus CAGs were always intended as additional air power for the army, granting them ground attack abilities on top of the heavy fighters.

3. Construction of IJN Yamato will be finished in July 1940. This will provide our shipyards with much-needed experience in construction of such large vessels, which should reduce the construction time of future battleships. No new BBs or BCs will be ordered before IJN Yamato is finished.
Agreed, though no CVs and no more than the one CVL we agreed upon will be ordered either.

4. At least one new CL should be ordered as soon as possible.
Agreed.

5. No new infantry divisions will be formed.
I'd prefer to continue with the current plan raising troops and revising it as the war goes on. We also still need to decide whether or not we suggest to the emperor to form puppet regimes as this will directly affect the number of troops we need to pacify China.

6. Only 1-2 ART/AT/AA should be in production at the same time.
Agreed, we should have sufficient support brigades shorty.

7. Research-wise, we should make the improvement of our military doctrines a top priority. This may improve the quality of our forces without putting a greater strain on our industry. This concerns all branches of the military. We should invest heavily in ASW, too.
As far as I am aware, the doctrines affecting BBs and BCs should be up to date. If I missed something, please tell me what exactly I missed out.
 
Agreed, though no CVs and no more than the one CVL we agreed upon will be ordered either.
The specific production orders for capital ships will be discussed in 1940 (how many new BBs/BCs/CVs/CVLs and when), but ATM no new ships should be added to the production queue in 1939 and early 1940 except one CVL (at the expense of naval infantry) and potentially CL(s).

I'd prefer to continue with the current plan raising troops and revising it as the war goes on. We also still need to decide whether or not we suggest to the emperor to form puppet regimes as this will directly affect the number of troops we need to pacify China.
I advise the Army to reduce the number of new infantry divs to the minimum - we should focus on GARs and MPs.

I think that after China is pacified we should focus our attention on achieving dominance over the Pacific Ocean, which means war with the USA, the UK, the French and the Dutch. We should not attack them before 1942, as we need to expand our ship-building program first. We should leave the Soviets alone for the moment, as we have no chance of success against them without the support of the Germans. I do not believe that we will gain much from direct control over China, because we will need many troops to confront the Allies and the USA and China would only divert our attention.

As far as I am aware, the doctrines affecting BBs and BCs should be up to date. If I missed something, please tell me what exactly I missed out.
You are partially correct. Here is the list of techs I find important and which receive little or no funding ATM:

Group I - techs that affect targeting and detection
Fire Control Training
Radar Training
Commander Decision Making

Group II - training of naval/air staff
Carrier Crew Training
Cruiser Escort Doctrine
Naval Air Control Doctrine
Base Suppression

Group III - ASW, received absolutely no funding
ASW Tactics
Carrier Escort Doctrine
Small Warship ASW (1940)

Group IV - Capital Ships
Aircraft Carrier Armour (1940)
BB/BC Design Techs (1940)
 
I advise the Army to reduce the number of new infantry divs to the minimum - we should focus on GARs and MPs.
At least HQ north agrees on this, including the reduction of art-types produced, we do want to produce a H.Ftr and some infra soon.
I think that after China is pacified we should focus our attention on achieving dominance over the Pacific Ocean, which means war with the USA, the UK, the French and the Dutch. We should not attack them before 1942, as we need to expand our ship-building program first. We should leave the Soviets alone for the moment, as we have no chance of success against them without the support of the Germans.
We must be ready to support an attack on the Soviets the moment they are attacked by the Germans, pact or no pact, as the Germans in no way can win a war against the Soviets.
I do not believe that we will gain much from direct control over China, because we will need many troops to confront the Allies and the USA and China would only divert our attention.
I disagree, we need the factories there and already 20+ factories contribute to our production.
You are partially correct. Here is the list of techs I find important and which receive little or no funding ATM:

Group II - training of naval/air staff
Base Suppression

Group IV - Capital Ships
BB/BC Design Techs (1940)

Not being a sailor myself, but a military man, I would advice against going for too many target, you should drop base suppression and either BB or BC design (both are definitely too much), the current amount of research will not be sustainable as we get up to date with more and more techs.
 
*High Command Meeting

Dear Admirals and Generals,

It can be misleading to just look at the map and assume that if we have 1-lvl airports nearby, we can provide proper air support to our armies and fleets. Same goes for provinces with poor infrastructure, as they will greatly hamper R&R. The importance of air power cannot be ignored - it is not a coincidence that in places where proper air support can be provided, our advance is much faster than in other areas.
I don't follow you here, as far as I can see we have all the airports we ever are going to use against the Chinese, we would need 1 halfway to Irkutsk when we go against the Soviets and maybe one in west china, but neither of these are in our control currently. Also the north Palua potential airport would cover the only front that is not covered by current air ports.
It seems that General Surt sometimes gets carried away with daydreaming and ignores facts. Gentlemen, we need to face the reality honourably - our industry is nowhere near strong enough to fulfil all our needs. We cannot hope to start massive infrastructure projects, increase our army and air force in size and build heavy capital ships at the same time. Period.
That is right at this moment, but then again most construction sites are still on Chinese hands.
It should also be noted that the Chinese may stop us with two things only - numbers and logistical difficulties.
That is why we will start the infra construction out from Shanghai so they can't hole up in west China and we can support our troops in Manchuria.
BTW Surt, if you look at the screenshots, you will see that we have already established a collaboration government in China.

Hmm, I'm getting old, I can't seen that, there is no political screenshot that shows occupation policies that I can find???
 
We must be ready to support an attack on the Soviets the moment they are attacked by the Germans, pact or no pact, as the Germans in no way can win a war against the Soviets.
We should only attack the Soviets if we see that we have a reasonable chance to win, i.e. when Germany makes some progress and the Soviets will redeploy most of their troops from the Far East to the West.

Also, ATM the Germans show no intention of attacking the Soviets - they seem to be targeting the Allied powers. If we attack the UK while they are at war with Germany, they [the British] will not be able to bring the full might of the Royal Navy to Asia.

I disagree, we need the factories there and already 20+ factories contribute to our production.
Those factories will never work as effectively as the Japanese factories do. Chinese labour, while cheap, is of poor quality and pesky anti-Japanese activists are reducing the industrial efficiency of Chinese factories even further. The main intention for war in China was our resource situation - the Emperor said that Himself. Now we need to secure the Dutch oil fields, as the trade agreements with the USA are no longer secure and we need oil in order to expand our influence in Asia and the Pacific.

Not being a sailor myself, but a military man, I would advice against going for too many target, you should drop base suppression and either BB or BC design (both are definitely too much), the current amount of research will not be sustainable as we get up to date with more and more techs.
Some of those techs can be low priority ones.

General Surt, do you imply that the Navy is not part of the Nation's military? If you do, then I feel offended!

Additional note:

I believe that it is in our best interest to refrain from joining the Axis ATM. The fate of Germany is still not certain.

EDIT: Surt - Click here

EDIT2:
I don't follow you here, as far as I can see we have all the airports we ever are going to use against the Chinese, we would need 1 halfway to Irkutsk when we go against the Soviets and maybe one in west china, but neither of these are in our control currently. Also the north Palua potential airport would cover the only front that is not covered by current air ports.
Against the Chinese - it may be true, although an airfield in Shanghai could be useful. However, I'm thinking about our long-term goals here. Poor quality infrastructure and underdeveloped airfields can hamper the R&R of aircraft (the lower the infra and airfield levels, the lower the process of regaining ORG/STR) and air power will be crucial during the war with the USA and the Allies.
 
Last edited:
We should only attack the Soviets if we see that we have a reasonable chance to win, i.e. when Germany makes some progress and the Soviets will redeploy most of their troops from the Far East to the West.
That is not HQ Norths opinion, quiet opposite we need to strike immediately when hostilities begin, that will make it possible to capture the largest number of enemy troops. But our troops must be in position and mobilized to do this.
Also, ATM the Germans show no intention of attacking the Soviets - they seem to be targeting the Allied powers. If we attack the UK while they are at war with Germany, they [the British] will not be able to bring the full might of the Royal Navy to Asia.
While the British will be weak, an attack upon them will provoke the USA to attack us too, we should look at the threat after we defeat the Chinese. I'm pretty certain that any land grabbing by us after the defeat of the Chinese would push us over the edge regarding the USA, except of course against the Soviets who the USA for some reason don't trust nor care about.
Those factories will never work as effectively as the Japanese factories do. Chinese labour, while cheap, is of poor quality and pesky anti-Japanese activists are reducing the industrial efficiency of Chinese factories even further. The main intention for war in China was our resource situation - the Emperor said that Himself.
Close analysis shows we can do both, and the number of factories will increase as we move on, more factories equals shorter path to greater power and therefore also to more leadership.
Now we need to secure the Dutch oil fields, as the trade agreements with the USA are no longer secure and we need oil in order to expand our influence in Asia and the Pacific.
I blame the foreign minister for that, he should have said we of course would negotiate! the Chinese would have rejected and the USA would have loved us for being so peaceful!!! If he wasn't an army man I'd fire him.
Some of those techs can be low priority ones.
I'd say the priority should be none for 2 of those. The others are reasonable but I suspect that we can't even keep up with them.
It is my opinion that the AAA, Radar(and scout planes?) also need high priority even if they cost lots of money, else we risk that the new fleet carriers the USA is building has a chance against us.
General Surt, do you imply that the Navy is not part of the Nation's military? If you do, then I feel offended!
Well not all sailors are military men, that doesn't imply admirals aren't, I'm just saying that too many targets are as effective as no target.
Additional note:

I believe that it is in our best interest to refrain from joining the Axis ATM. The fate of Germany is still not certain.
I'm split between joining (for the research benefit) and not joining for the lesser threat. I'd like to hear HQ south and Admiral Baltasars thoughts on this matter.

Well that's from an old briefing :) beyond the horizon of short term memory!!!
 
I blame the foreign minister for that, he should have said we of course would negotiate! the Chinese would have rejected and the USA would have loved us for being so peaceful!!! If he wasn't an army man I'd fire him.
There was no way of knowing what the Chinese reaction would be.

Gentlemen,

I also think that we should ask the Head of Intelligence for a report concerning the British ships - any information we can get regarding the number of their capital ships can be useful. It could also be beneficial to slowly begin the expansion of our spy network in the USA, as we no longer need to expand our network in Guangxi, which is our ally.
 
I would be against using any spies on our enemies, we simply can not afford the effort against the USA and the UK is not a danger in itself, we must simply deal with that they are 3 times and 2 times respectively greater in IC than we are, even if they use most of it on toys right now and only build as much as we do, that would be if we spend more than 60IC on build up.
 
General Surt,

raw industrial capacity is one thing, how much of it can be used against us is something different. Geographically, our position is both comfortable and uncomfortable at the same time. It is comfortable, because as long as we can keep the enemy's forces away from our shores, the country is safe and we can expand. However, this also means that once the enemy achieves naval superiority, even on the local scale, he can cause us considerable damage. Convoys may easily be sunk when the enemy control the seas and lost ships will be hard to replace with newer ones.

Considering that we already have a spy network in the UK, it is only prudent to request a report about the number of capital ships the UK has. If we lack funds for expansion of our intelligence network in the USA, then we can delay that by a year, when the Chinese question should already be resolved.
 
Army Plan
Pending approval General Cody and various Sailors.

This is an amendment to the many times reposted plan :)

Proposed budget:
Current budget but
7th art and 1 Rikusenshidan postponed to more prosperous times.
Priorities in order
Factories as is
Convoys as is
Radars as is
BB Yamato 11IC
CVL (new) 7IC (at half the total IC to a CV, this looks like an viable alternative, even if it cost double the supply).
4 Sentou H.Ftr 13IC (the 2nd H.Ftr currently under construction will be produced when this finished and the repeated)
3rd AT (no restart) 2.5IC
8th art, restarted with different arts until all units have support. 2.5IC
5 x 2 garx2 when finished 4xMPx2 then replaced with infra 7.5IC
CL 8IC - navy need at least one of these per capital to avoid penalty. (trivia, if simultaneous building 2BB(21IC) and 3CVL(21IC) the navy would need 3 2/3 CL(30IC) and 1 CAG(10IC) just to keep up)
infrastructure in China + Toyohara (up to 32IC) Start by improving all the purple lines pieces that we hold in the below map to level 4.
railines3.jpg


If the impossible should happen and we get more IC than the projected we can prepare for the different Plans
5 Garx2 for Soviet ports, 2xMPx2 for soviet oil,very roughly 20 garsx2 for Dutch ports, 4xMPx2 for Dutch/British oil that is not on ports, 1xMPx2 for Kuala Lumpurs metal, we wont bother with the rares!!! (before we go in deficit with them), very roughly 10xgarx2 for USA harbours in the pacific.
5 Garx2 for Philippines (if we don't puppet them)

Supplies and convoys, could the clerk in charge of supplies stop the convoy to our mainland supply source port when it exceed 20K supplies, Qingdao might not do anything useful at that point either, he can leave the others on. This will hopefully average out the supply need a little.

Politics, once we have raised our national unity to over 70% we need to strengthen the organisation of our ruling party so we can make collaborative governments in occupied areas, in the moment we can chose between get many partisans and get nothing, which is about the same for resouces, collaboratory should give us around 30% of the resources.
Remove any minister with +resources, we wont need them from now on.

Research
remove rares from research list, we will drown in them now.

Army orders:
Shanghai Ichigun, once Nanjing falls take the 2 adjacent VPs.
Canton II hold the line, remember to keep a continuous line to the coast. reduce to 1 Homengun
+++Marines to capture the port just east of Canton II and link up with them.
Canton I attack direction Changsha, take over 1 Homengun from Canton II, remove one to Guangxi.
Peking HQ, attack from Jinan toward Baofeng, but hold the line in the north, do not take Shanxi.

Contingency plans in case the KMT gets desperate and calls in its remaining allies: (this also means our big plan has failed as we took too much territory compared to VP)
The Guangxi Homengun will help their host pacify Yunnan.
All other armies will attack toward the nearest not occupied VP provinces that are hold by the KMT.
Any not committed troops will take the remaining ports.

Contingency plan in case the KMT succumbs to our irresistible armies:
Shanghai and Canton will cooperate cut off south east China.
Peking will go all out against the ComChi homeland taking their 2 home VP after which they should admit defeat, our HB should have reduced their production to zero at this point.

Decisions that the Emperor asked us to make
No to new puppets in China.
No to Germany at present time, we will reconsider this at the next meeting.
Army orders as above.

Other contingency plans:
Should some small nations like Vietnam, Malaya somehow fall into our hands we should puppet them if possible due to their hight number of resources and low number of factories, if that is impossible set up collaborative government in the occupied zones.
 
Last edited:
Admiral Baltasar, here is a proposed priority list concerning naval technological development:

1. Doctrines concerning carriers, CAGs, battleships and cruisers, 1940 ones can be started in Dec 1939 if the budget allows it.
2. ASW techs
3. New BB design techs (can be started in Dec 1939 if the budget allows it) and better carrier armour (only in 1940)
4. Radar training, fire control etc.
5. CL AA
6. Naval infantry techs
7. BC techs

I also think that we should think about improving the AA capabilities of all our ships in 1940. This includes researching techs needed to unlock DD AA tech, which affects all ship types.
 
Admiral Baltasar, here is a proposed priority list concerning naval technological development:

Design techs should always be researched before doctrines. The reasoning is that doctrines will affect all ships anyway while better design principles only apply for ships being started after the design tech has been done.


1. Doctrines concerning carriers, CAGs, battleships and cruisers, 1940 ones can be started in Dec 1939 if the budget allows it.
There is an awful lot of doctrines affecting carriers, I would ask you to shorten that wishlist. In this form, it'd mean a significant investment of research assets for the carriers while next to none will be left for the battleships, which are still the mainstay weapon for us.

Common doctrines:*
Radar Training:
Fire control system training
Commander decision making
Underway replenishment
Base operations
Cruiser crew training
Battleline cruiser doctrine


Priorities for the battlewagon faction would be:
1) Capital ship crew training
2) Sealane control
3) Battleship taskforce doctrine
4) Independent Battleship operations


2. ASW techs
Where they can be used by CL, that'd be ok. Since we do not invest into DDs, it'd be a waste to upgrade them.

3. New BB design techs (can be started in Dec 1939 if the budget allows it) and better carrier armour (only in 1940)
If that is including scout planes...

4. Radar training, fire control etc.
See above

See above

6. Naval infantry techs
They'll profit a lot from land techs and doctrines already, is there something we need to look into here?

7. BC techs
They'd have to be at least on par with CVL techs. Since CVL are included in CV techs, the BC techs must be as important as BB techs. This might lessen the much larger number of doctrines required by the flattop faction for their toys.

I also think that we should think about improving the AA capabilities of all our ships in 1940. This includes researching techs needed to unlock DD AA tech, which affects all ship types.
Agreed, though we should only invest in AA techs of BB/BC/CV/CVL/CL since those are the ships we plan to build and rely on most.

*I'm running a FTM alpha of HPP, if the doctrines have changed, just apply them where applicable.
 
Where they can be used by CL, that'd be ok. Since we do not invest into DDs, it'd be a waste to upgrade them.
By ASW techs I mean all techs and doctrines affecting escort efficiency. We use outdated equipment and tactics ATM.

They'd have to be at least on par with CVL techs. Since CVL are included in CV techs, the BC techs must be as important as BB techs. This might lessen the much larger number of doctrines required by the flattop faction for their toys.
ATM we are researching 1936 Battlecruiser Engines IIRC. I don't think that we need new BC design tech yet... Although I think that BCs should not be disregarded, as they are much faster than BBs and might support our CVs and CVLs in CTF vs CTF battles. Keep in mind that the design tech doesn't do much on its own.

There is an awful lot of doctrines affecting carriers, I would ask you to shorten that wishlist. In this form, it'd mean a significant investment of research assets for the carriers while next to none will be left for the battleships, which are still the mainstay weapon for us.
I will make a priority list for the IJN Carrier Faction. However, we need to come up with a common research plan.

Agreed, though we should only invest in AA techs of BB/BC/CV/CVL/CL since those are the ships we plan to build and rely on most.
DD AA tech affects all ship types.

They'll profit a lot from land techs and doctrines already, is there something we need to look into here?
I am talking about amphibious warfare equipment etc. Those should be a low priority ATM.
 
Last edited:
By ASW techs I mean all techs and doctrines affecting escort efficiency. We use outdated equipment and tactics ATM.
I assume that we can increase the priority of such projects if the need arises. Obviously we do not need to do it right now, but I would ask the army to share the burden budget wise, since the convoys are a concern for the Empire as such, not for the navy only.

ATM we are researching 1936 Battlecruiser Engines IIRC. I don't think that we need new BC design tech yet... Although I think that BCs should not be disregarded, as they are much faster than BBs and might support our CVs and CVLs in CTF vs CTF battles. Keep in mind that the design tech doesn't do much on its own.
The BCs are meant as a compromise between speed, firepower and survivability. Once get more modern ones, we intend to deploy them in fleets together with light cruisers as a first response and interdiction group. They are not earmarked for duties along carriers. Depending on which techs are more advanced by the time the IJN Yamato is finished, we might opt to start BCs instead of another BB, but this will be dependend on the situation once we are there.

I will make a priority list for the IJN Carrier Faction. However, we need to come up with a common research plan.
All techs affecting both factions would be shared budget wise. All other techs are on the wishlist and should be slipped in one by one, meaning that we at the very least need to have as many battlewagon projects being researched as flattop projects.

I am talking about amphibious warfare equipment etc. Those should be a low priority ATM.
Agreed, the current equipment is sufficient.
 
BB/BC techs

Design x2
Engine x2 (BB ones are already good, BC are outdated but are being researched)
Scout Planes
Capital Ship Armaments (they are already high)
Capital Ship AA
Large Warship Radar
Capital Ship Crew Training (currently being researched)
BB Task Force Doctrine (ok)

CV/CVL techs
Design (good)
Engine (good)
Armour
AA (good)
Carrier Crew Training
Carrier Task Force Doctrine (currently being researched)
CAG Pilot Training
Naval Air Control

The other techs are either common ones or the ones which we are not interested in. As you can see, there are actually more BB/BC specific techs than CV/CVL ones.

All other techs are on the wishlist and should be slipped in one by one, meaning that we at the very least need to have as many battlewagon projects being researched as flattop projects.
This will rarely be the case, because some techs are being researched sooner than other ones, sometimes the CV/BB ones are already good enough etc., so your reasoning is flawed.

We should create just one priority list and the clerks will do the rest.
 
Last edited:
CV/CVL AA techs are different ones than BB/BC?

Large warship radar should affect CV/CVL too.

You missed out all the aircraft techs, which only the flattop and possibly the army is interested in.

All other techs are on the wishlist and should be slipped in one by one, meaning that we at the very least need to have as many battlewagon projects being researched as flattop projects.
This will rarely be the case, because some techs are being researched sooner than other ones, sometimes the CV/BB ones are already good enough etc., so your reasoning is flawed.
Since we do not have the budget to fund all our desired projects simultaneously, I assume that it will indeed be the case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.