• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Status
Not open for further replies.
*I've been thinking about making amphibious invasions more realistic and challenging, since they will be crucial for future gameplay. I devised the following rules:

1) Hawaiian Islands cannot be invaded unless the Midway Island and Johnston Atoll are controlled by Japan.
2) The West Coast, Panama etc. cannot be invaded until all other American possessions in the Pacific are controlled by Japan (this includes only provinces with ports)
3) Eastern Australian provinces cannot be invaded unless New Guinea and all south Pacific islands up to New Caledonia are controlled by Japan.
4) Southern Australian provinces cannot be invaded unless New Guinea, all south Pacific islands up to New Caledonia and New Zealand are controlled by Japan.
5) Northern and western Australian provinces cannot be invaded until Java is controlled by Japan.
6) Areas west of Malaya cannot be invaded until Singapore is controlled by Japan.
7) Siberian non-port provinces cannot be invaded.
8) Land units cannot be evacuated unless there is a friendly port nearby.

These rules are meant to represent various logistical difficulties (and deal with AI shortcomings) connected with amphibious warfare that are not represented in HOI3 and they should make the game a bit more challenging, too.
 
Last edited:
Aye.
 
1) Hawaiian Islands cannot be invaded unless the Midway Island and Johnston Atoll are controlled by Japan.
Hawaii was attacked before Midway, no logisitical difficulties applied here to the real Japanese forces...
2) The West Coast, Panama etc. cannot be invaded until all other American possessions in the Pacific are controlled by Japan (this includes only provinces with ports)
Could you narrow that down to all US ports north of the equator? Don't want to go for completely useless poesssions...
3) Southern and eastern Australian provinces (Brisbane, Canberra etc.) cannot be invaded unless New Guinea and New Zealand are controlled by Japan.
New Zealand is even further away than eastern Australia, not a logical prerequisition.[/quote]
6) Siberian non-port provinces cannot be invaded.
So we will need to throw a whole marine corps against defended ports?
7) Land units cannot be evacuated unless there is a friendly port nearby.
I hope the emperor realizes that with the level of (non) control the Generals have, this will require him to intervene more often.

The game will be quite challenging once we start looking for serious trouble, ie UK, USA
 
I will restate my opinion of clerks "Evacuate? In our moment of triumph? I think you overestimate their chances.", there will be no evacuations as it is against the honour of the army. But I must say I prefer landings "were they ain't".
 
Hawaii was attacked before Midway, no logisitical difficulties applied here to the real Japanese forces...
It was not an amphibious invasion. You can still make port strikes etc. Also, it is too easy to take Honolulu in HOI3 and the AI doesn't realise how important it is.

Also, check it out - Invasion: Pearl Harbor!

Could you narrow that down to all US ports north of the equator? Don't want to go for completely useless poesssions...
The point is that Japan shouldn't be able to attack the West Coast unless their defence perimeter is secured. Keep in mind that it includes only provinces with ports and it doesn't include Alaska.

So we will need to throw a whole marine corps against defended ports?
Yes, you will have to attack ports directly. Otherwise, massive encirclements from the sea are too easy to make in Siberia. Besides, the climate in this region doesn't suit amphibious invasion well in general, and we all know how the weather system works in HOI3.

New Zealand is even further away than eastern Australia, not a logical prerequisition.
Potential invasion of Australia would only be feasible if supply routes to Australia were cut off. HOI3 doesn't represent the importance of Australia very well (although I made some adjustments), it models naval distance poorly and it's amphibious invasion system is arcade, so invasion of Australia is too easy. However, I might be persuaded to include everything up to New Caledonia for an invasion of eastern Australia and New Zealand for an invasion of southern Australia.

Keep in mind that you can still advance by land.

I hope the emperor realizes that with the level of (non) control the Generals have, this will require him to intervene more often.
If there is a port nearby, I can turn the AI off and move the units to ports if necessary.

The game will be quite challenging once we start looking for serious trouble, ie UK, USA
Oh, yes, it will :). Where's the fun in winning? ;)

EDIT: I changed the rules concerning Australia slightly.
 
Last edited:
*Plans approved

Ok, it doesn't seem that anyone has anything more to add, so I might as well start playing :).

A small note concerning player activity and deadlines - if you have exams or private matters which require your attention, then please inform me by PM. This will help me to determine an appropriate deadline and even if it is infeasible to move the deadline, I will at least know that I do not have to wait for X to say sth. ATM I'm shooting in the dark, so deadlines are certainly not sth that is unchangeable.
 
Last edited:
Memorandum: I don't believe that these noted logistical difficulties are too resticting. All that is needed is careful planning so that operations occur without a hitch.

Pending this update I shall unveil a potential plan to strike the United States that incorperates these 'difficulties' in its stride.

On China apart from my aformentioned stratergy I don't see any other critical points to make reguarding our position, other than to reaffirm that we should not be hasty to join the axis alligance. If we do so it should be on our own terms and only from a position of supremacy in our given theaters. Now is not the time.

I have nothing more to add.

Taisho Yamamoto
 
Influence Levels

1. Industrial Capacity:

IJA - 60%

IJN - 40%


2. Leadership

IJA - 50%

IJN - 50%


3. Manpower

IJA - 70%

IJN - 30%



New ship orders mean that the Navy needs a bigger budget, although most of it is still being consumed by the Army. Infrastructure development program is costly, but it will greatly benefit us in the long term.


General Influence Levels - IJA 60% / IJN 40%

*Note that the General Influence Level doesn't mean much by itself. It's just there to show the average influence levels of both factions.
 
Chapter Three, Part Six: Sino-Japanese War
Jul 1940 - Dec 1940

Previously in the Influence Wars...

Shanxi was conquered and the Japanese advanced inland, but were defeated at Changsha, Baofeng and Nanchang. The High Command created a plan which consisted of an attack from two sides which was supposed to result in an encirclement on a grand scale near Wuhan.

And now, the conclusion...


Politcs


Foreign politics





The most important news of the last months came in October - just when the Germans where approaching Paris, the Soviet Union declared war on the German Reich, citing "an unprovoked act of aggression" against Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Poland and the Low Countries as the reason for war. For many this move came as a surprise, because wars in Lithuania and Finland proved that the Red Army was not ready for a prolonged conflict with a major power. Some, however, claimed that the Soviets did this because they were afraid that after the Germans are done with the western countries, the Reich will come for them next. This reason makes sense in the light of the fact that Adolf Hitler is known for his vehement anti-communist views. For Germany, this was the realisation of their worst fears - a war on two fronts which may easily turn into another Great War.

The declaration of war opened the question of Persia - a neutral country standing between the two powers - the British Empire and the Soviet Union - which now shared the common enemy. Due to British diplomatic pressure, Reza Shah Pahlavi abdicated in favour of his son, who declared war on Germany and their allies.

Hostilities in Europe discredited the appeasement policy and as a result, Winston Churchill became the new Prime Minister of the UK.





Despite the fact that Germany is now fighting on two fronts, as these words are being written, the French are on the brink of collapse and may surrender any day. In the East, the frontline is more static - it seems that the Axis alliance adopted a defensive posture there in order to focus their attention on France first. Germany was supported by Slovakia, Hungary, Italy, Bulgaria and Romania (which had a coup d'etat in September and the new government signed the Anti-Comintern Pact), while the western powers have recently added another country to their alliance - the Kingdom of Sweden. It should be noted that to this date the Germans made no attempt at invading Norway. This apparent lack of naval prowess seems to differ significantly from their great successes on land.

When Italy supported Germany in their war against the West, it seemed that the world would witness a long and brutal struggle in North Africa and the Mediterranean. However, Italy seems to be poorly prepared for war, as the British made a daring and strong push in Libya and are currently besieging Benghazi.


Domestic matters





The Soviet move against Germany removed all uncertainty and the Emperor fully supported Konoe Fumimaro as the next Prime Minister. His pro-Axis policy is most needed now, when the Axis alliance needs any support it can get. At the same time, though, the Empire of Japan did not officially join the Axis, as this would restrict our potential diplomatic and strategic actions while we are still engaged in China.

The colonial powers did not take this move lightly and soon enough, the USA, the UK, Netherlands, Belgium and various other countries aligned with the western powers put an embargo on the Empire of Japan. Fortunately, though, the Japanese stockpiles are now big enough to withstand the effects of the embargoes for some time. From now on it will be much harder to find sources of oil by diplomatic means, though.

The fascists approved of the appointment of Konoe and it seems that the nation is united in the support for the Axis. The only disappointment was the fact that the Empire did not join the Axis and the fascists are now pressing the government to do so.

This unity enables us to greatly increase the mobilisation of our economy for the war effort. If we make this move, though, the world will find the Empire even more threatening to the status quo.

The biggest question is how to respond to the recent developments in Europe. Most of our potential enemies are now engaged elsewhere, so if we act now, it is very likely that they will be unprepared for this move. However, war in China is still not over, which means that we would be opening new fronts willingly.


War in China


June-July - struggle near Wuhan






When two important battles in Qizhhou and Daye were won in June, it seemed that the fate of the Chinese armies was sealed. However, the enemy made a counter-attack in July which prevented the encirclement from being formed.


August Breakthrough






The real breakthrough came in August, when the Chinese fighting in coastal areas and in Nanchang were cut off from the temporary capital of Wuhan. They never managed to reconnet their lines again and thus the slow process of the destruction of the pocket began. The Japanese armies were ordered to approach the enemy conservatively, attacking only when victory was certain and without suffering unnecessary losses. Japanese heavy bombers were busy destroying the enemy's stockpiles and the infrastructure inside the pocket during daylight hours and lighter aircraft were pounding the enemy with smaller bombs throughout the days and nights. By early October, the enemy's armies were reduced to rubble. This was probably the biggest Japanese victory during the Sino-Japanese War yet.


Northern troubles





While the bulk of our forces was engaged in Central China, the enemy made a very threatening counter-attack further north, which destroyed several of the infrastructure projects that were being developed there and resulted in the encirclement and destruction of one of our divisions. The Emperor immediately ordered the 1st AG to engage the Chinese in the north, but it took time for the troops to be redeployed and for a while the Chinese went almost unopposed.





Therefore, October brought both good and bad news. The good news was that Wuhan fell to our forces. The bad news was that the northern Chinese counterattacked reached as far as Shanxi and it was a direct threat to the Northern HQ.


Fighting in Southern China





In October, the Chinese started a massive counter-attack in Southern China, which overwhelmed the Japanese and pro-Japanese Chinese forces stationed there by sheer numbers. In early December, the Chinese regained control over Chongqing.

The situation in China became very frustrating for the Japanese soldiers - any time they manage to score a decisive victory in one place, the Chinese counter-attack elsewhere and regain the land which they lost. The common soldiers are talking about the conspiracies of fate and the gods, but the officers and the quartermasters know the truth - this is the result of the Chinese numerical superiority and the vastness of the area we have to control.


Overview of the situation in China





The Japanese armies in China were reorganised into four HQs, corresponding to their geographical position. We control the whole coastline and big areas of Central China, but the whole Western China and most of Northern and Southern China are still outside of our sphere of influence.


Other matters





*If you are wondering about the 60k supply stockpile, this is because I had to edit the save-game and transfer some supplies from Shanghai to Tokyo - otherwise, the supply system in China would collapse, as there were no convoys running, because the game thought that were enough supplies in China due to big stockpile in Shanghai, not counting other areas. It is a known SF bug.

Merchantmen production was decreased, as the current size of the merchant marine was deemed sufficient and there are other, more important priorities. When the newest engines became available, production of a battlecruiser IJN Kurama was started. Also, another light carrier, IJN Shoho, was ordered as soon as modern carrier armour was developed.

Another heavy fighter wing was formed and yet another one will be formed in January 1941.

Infrastructure developments in China continue, although the Chinese counter-attack in the north caused some setbacks.

Japanese generals are now working on developing the future operational doctrine.

List of researched technologies during the covered period:
Small Warship ASW, Artillery techs, Mechanical Computing Machine, Scout Planes, Supply Production, Attritional Containment, Aircraft Carrier Deck Armour, Encryption Machine, Infantry Training, Battlecruiser Design & Engine, Interception Tactics, Supply Organisation & Transportation, Anti-Tank Barrel and Sights, Defensive Support Weapons.


Numbers of war


 
Last edited:
Situation in China:
I believe that our forces made achieve the decisive victory when they annihalated those Chinese forces in the pocket. Do we have an estimate about how many units we managed to take out? It'd give us a good idea about how many may be left. The Chinese thrust in the north shouldn't concern us much since we'll now be able reorganise our forces to adress this threat without endangering our other theatres.

Message to our fellow Generals:
How long do you think we need before the war in China is finished?

Construction:
I firmly believe that the war in China is drawing to an end, but to me it seems like our forces lack sufficient punch face the forces of the colonial powers. The Chinese forces we are fighting may be spirited but they lack modern equipment and leadership, the western powers, corrupt and misguided as they may be, do have a lot more firepower per division than the Chinese. Even the Soviet communists do have more modern equipment, although they obviously suffer from the reign of Stalin. Regardless of where strike next, we have to keep several points in mind:

- The Home Islands must not suffer enemy intrusions. To this end, all ports must be guarded with a garrison force. These units should consist of three garrison brigades with one artillery support brigade. We should also consider establishing a mobile reserve force of two full infantry corps, possibly with another corps of mobile infantry, all of them as a reserve force. Those forces could also function as reserve forces should the need arise to deploy emergency backup forces abroad, although this would be limited to the emperor himself to decide.

- The Pacific holdings must be held. Although they are economically unimportant, they are, after all, our soil, our holdings and to an extend, our homes. We can not accept that other countries might occupy what is rightfully ours. To this end, all ports need to be defended by at least two garrison brigades with one artillery brigade as fire support. Exceptions will be made for very important ports like Truk where an additional garrison brigade should be considered. The navy will ensure the safety of our Pacific holdings by stationing one surface action group on Truk on a permanent basis. Additional fleets will be sent to intercept any landings, should they occur. The SNLF Corps will immediately be dispatched if one of our Islands should fall. Unless they are involved in combat operations, the SNLF should be stationed on their HQ Island, Taiwan, together with a transport group (transports plus escort ships) with sufficient room to transport a whole corps at a moment notice.

- Pacified China bust be secured. Once the war is over, the conquered territory must be secured. We will undoubtly see uprisings in this troublesome country, so we will need to leave garrison forces behind. All ports should be occupied to keep the most obvious routes of insertion closed. Mobile forces will be needed to subdue partisans, too. The army will need to provide more detailed plans for these duties.

The question is, how many units we will have left after these neccessities have been addressed. We do need to do the math to be able to make the right decisions for the future. It'd be folly to try to go to war with too few forces available and it'd likewise be unwise to throw every unit into the meatgrinder and have the enemy land in our backs or lose China to partisans. So, I again suggest to increase the number of available brigades, dramatically if we need to.

Since the Russians are busy in the west without much success, we should seriously consider attacking them first and address the western powers later because we might never get another chance like this. This would not even require us to join the Axis, so we could avoid a two front war. While I personally would like to see the colonial powers driven off, we might not get another so favourable chance against Russia in the forseeable future, so once China is pacified and our troops are in position, we should have a look at the front in Europe to determine whether or not Russia is loosing or winning and then decide where we strike next.

Regarding our merchant fleet, I suggest that we agree on a threshold to determine how large our reserve should be. I would suggest that we should have 150 merchants and 30 escorts in reserve at all times. Once we drop below these numbers, we need to build new ships.

Research:
I do not have any changed recommendations for our research plans and instead avise to adhere the afore sent priority list.
 
Do we have an estimate about how many units we managed to take out?
The Administration believes that more than 150 brigades of various quality were destroyed. However, it is only a rough estimate, as it is impossible to determine how many soldiers the Chinese really lost. China is a big country and our enemy doesn't have a shortage of men, but we are certain that the Chinese will have much more trouble replacing their losses now, since the most industrialised areas of China are controlled by Japan and they no longer has access to ports. However, we believe that they are being supplied through the so-called "Burma Road" by the British with resources and equipment. The Soviets also supported them with pilots and aircraft.

Since the Russians are busy in the west without much success, we should seriously consider attacking them first and address the western powers later because we might never get another chance like this. This would not even require us to join the Axis, so we could avoid a two front war.
The Administration wants to point out that we are still bound by the non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union. We can break it if we back this up with enough force OR we can claim to act in Germany's defence, but this would require us to join the Axis and we would find ourselves at war with both the western powers and the Soviet Union.

I do not have any changed recommendations for our research plans and instead avise to adhere the afore sent priority list.
*Do you not want to take into account the fact that various 1941 techs became available? It's DECEMBER of 1940.
 
Last edited:
Since the British are busy in Europe, the Burma road should see less traffic coming to Chinas aid currently. The USA are a different matter, though. The soviets are also busy banging their heads against German tanks, so we this source of supply should also see diminshed resources flowing there.

I would strongly recommend backup up a declaration of war against the Soviets with sufficient forces in any case and again, a two front war wouldn't be advisable in any case. While the navy can't do much against Russia and the army will not overextend herself against the colonial powers, we have to consider that inevitable losses will need to be replaced and that this would mean a lot of stress for our industry.
 
Research priorities for the Old guard navy:
Capital ship main armament
Large warship Radar
Small warship Radar
Small warship ASW
CL light armament
Battleship taskforce doctrine
Battleline cruiser doctrine
Capital ship crew training
DD techs if there is room for them in the queue


Common research projects (on top of what we need to research anyway):
Electronic computing machine
Radar
 
Stalins Backstab on the Germans is a cowardly and fairly unexpected move. The token advances shown be the Wehrmacht forces should not be read as a forgone conclusion to this western-soviet war (WSW). If anything all it shows is that this war is gearing up to be the largest in history.

My counsel is strongly against backing up Germany with a hasty jump into a war that we are not prepared to fight.

Strategically an invasion of soviet territory is a high cost for little gain endeavour. We would gain a summer port in Okhotsk, a couple of airbases in the Stannovoys and Khabarovsk'ktay, Vladivostok and the territories of Mongolia. Apart from some small oil reserves a fairly unimportant gain.

On the otherhand we have a matter of honour to avenge.

Yet remember the 47 Ronin*! they waited two years for Kira to be off his guard, convinced that no trouble would come from them. THEN they stuck, and fell themselves upon the blade of mercy and honour!

You like me have grown up with the tale of the Ronin and how it harkens to our cultural heritage and sense of bushido. This shall surely strike a cord with the public of the home islands and with the soliders when they realise that our Generals, like the Ronin act with the honour of true Samurai!

We shall avenge Japan and the Emperor, but we shall do so on our own terms!

We surrendered December last year when we were perched on the edge of a victory, betrayed by the cowards and traitors within our ranks! How do we fight them? We unite! We must join together for a greater Japan! We shall sacrifice, we shall struggle yet, but only then will we triumph. And we will triumph!

With the hero Samurai Tokugawa as our model, and our gracious Emperor as inspiration, we shall behead the profiteers, crush the communists, we shall disinfect asia of these soviet vermin!

We will triumph.


...But not now. We shall plan. We shall scheme. We shall have our revenge sweetly served. It shall be on our own terms. The Russian bear is not a single warlord. Stalin sits in his vegetable towers cuddled by his aids telling him anything he wants to hear to save themselves from a flippant purge.

They are weak. They are not critical. They are blind. Worried by the demagogue Hitler, they are preoccupied with tripping over his words and blundering though Europe.

If we are to use the opportunity presented by a western-soviet war it will be to distract the bear with the sent of an easy kill while we the hunter sets our trap.

World_around_1900.jpg


But being the hunters we are, we still have to collect our Chinese prize. The mark is mortally wounded but not dead yet, should we not be careful it may still get away with us.


Critically we should seek a combined push, both in the North and the South in Yunnan. The engineer divisions in the central homiguns need to be moved to the North China command. They should prove to be invaluable in cracking Mao's nuts. With his potentency taken, his rabble of millita can only regroup elsewhere and nowhere as strong as their were in the forts of the North.

As we are pushing against Mao we can move a corps to southern China command to bolster our Guangxi allies to take out Yunnan.

With Long Yun and Mao taken out, we can use our northern command to push down into central China taking the last cities while we consider the southern and central assets for redeployment.

Finally we push onto Golmud and collapse organised Chinese resistance for good!

ThirdC6ChinaOverview_editedbyyammoto.jpg


This may take 3-6 months to do depending on the level of Mao resistance and lack of supply in central China.

As always bombers should concentrate along the lines of advance, with assorted light ground attack fighter craft [H-Ftr, CAG] patrolling in interdiction rolls to prevent the enemy from gaining a footing.


We shall then make avenging our honour the highest priority.


In light of this change of strategic focus there will become a critical need of change in research priority to produce at least a corps (possibly 12 brigades) of Mountain troops, within the next year. This shall require the research of mountain troops and specialist missions.

I might also suggest that we research mechanised units. With our strong knowledge in infantry fighting vehicles, and their practical use in combat we should be able to design specific brigades that fight using this principle.

Once we have this technology we can take our experienced motorised brigades and equip them with modern weapons of war. These shall then become our crack divisions.

We might also want to look into electronic methods of computation to therefore make all other methods of research more effective.

Research Priorities:
electronic methods of computation
mountain troops
specialist missions
mechanised units

Given our use of CAGs at land it might be prudent that we research a land support focus. But I might also suggest we reaffirm their naval roll focus. Although this won't be as efficient as a single focus any additional land wars are still going to utilise our CAG assets and we would like to mitigate loss of sea rolls by seeing that aspect respected.

With out heavy fighters we have aircraft fighters with the dedicated air attack roll. CAGs are attack aircraft. Not air superiority ones.

Research Priority:
CAG Land Mission focus


I shall reaffirm that Japan should stand apart from the Germans. Joining the axis just so that we can declare war on the Soviets shall throw us into a conflict with the Colonial Powers as well. It won't be one war but TWO!.

The Germans would just be using us as a distraction....Exactly the roll we want to employ them as....

We should NOT wage a war against the soviets at this time.


Is there any other matters that deserve my eyes?

* http://www.samurai-archives.com/ronin.html
 
Last edited:
Is there any other matters that deserve my eyes?
*Which naval techs do you find critical? You now have access to SCs of tech screens above, so you can easily check what is the current research status. Also, what is your stance on enacting Mobilise for War decision and implementing War Economy? What should we build after two ships are completed in March? Should we continue to build IC? What do you think of Baltasar's merchantmen and convoy escorts thresholds?

BTW if we want TDs, then we need to think about researching Medium Armour techs. We can also build IST for practice.

BTW2 artillery from our garrisons on Japan was transferred to China, so we have a backlog here. That's why I keep producing ARTs, not ATs/AAs, but this can change, of course. More ATs would be good for the Soviets, more AAs would be good in places where limited air support can be provided due to range/supply issues or against enemies who have better aircraft than we do (the Allies, most likely).
 
Last edited:
Enact war economy. The Allies are at war already, all this could do is stirring up the USA a bit more. I say it's worth it.

Before we decide what next to build, I'd like to hear from our Generals what they think they need urgently. Also, I provided suggestions for the protection of our posessions, I'd like to hear what the leadership has to say about this. A decision there will inevitably have an inpact on our production plan.

More IC will not be neccessary. The current runs should be finished, then we should turn our assets elsewhere.

From what we hear, the artillery brigades are the most useful, thus we should continue to produce these instead of AA. AT might be an option, too, but not for garrison forces.
 
Regarding the recommendations from General Baltasar

Message to our fellow Generals:
How long do you think we need before the war in China is finished?
We would need a statement from the imperial Clerk to have a chance of guessing that, my guess is Chunking and one more should do it.
Construction:
I firmly believe that the war in China is drawing to an end, but to me it seems like our forces lack sufficient punch face the forces of the colonial powers. The Chinese forces we are fighting may be spirited but they lack modern equipment and leadership, the western powers, corrupt and misguided as they may be, do have a lot more firepower per division than the Chinese. Even the Soviet communists do have more modern equipment, although they obviously suffer from the reign of Stalin. Regardless of where strike next, we have to keep several points in mind:
Yes they do, but we think that quantity is more important that quality, that our divisions also have the quality edge against nearly all enemies is just lucky.
Our fronts are so long that we can't hope to cover them and at the same time supply them if we stuff 4-5 brigades in a significant number of divisions. I would guess the front against the Soviets will be 60 provinces long and therefore require at least 80 divisions just to hold it.
All wargames points to that the lesser Generals fights much better with more units that few larger.
- The Home Islands must not suffer enemy intrusions. To this end, all ports must be guarded with a garrison force. These units should consist of three garrison brigades with one artillery support brigade. We should also consider establishing a mobile reserve force of two full infantry corps, possibly with another corps of mobile infantry, all of them as a reserve force. Those forces could also function as reserve forces should the need arise to deploy emergency backup forces abroad, although this would be limited to the emperor himself to decide.
While we agree that the home lands should be protected with the mentioned garrisons, I think we have to reduce the reserve to 1 Gundan plus whatever forces are currently under construction.
- The Pacific holdings must be held. Although they are economically unimportant, they are, after all, our soil, our holdings and to an extend, our homes. We can not accept that other countries might occupy what is rightfully ours. To this end, all ports need to be defended by at least two garrison brigades with one artillery brigade as fire support. Exceptions will be made for very important ports like Truk where an additional garrison brigade should be considered. The navy will ensure the safety of our Pacific holdings by stationing one surface action group on Truk on a permanent basis. Additional fleets will be sent to intercept any landings, should they occur. The SNLF Corps will immediately be dispatched if one of our Islands should fall. Unless they are involved in combat operations, the SNLF should be stationed on their HQ Island, Taiwan, together with a transport group (transports plus escort ships) with sufficient room to transport a whole corps at a moment notice.
Also here I must say that after having re-estimated our resources I don't think its realistic to to cover every level 1 port in the pacific, all others should get 2 gar brigades and no art, while the largest holdings should get 3 gar and an art.
The most important are the level 10 ports and Iwo Jima, Marcus Island, Okinawa and Saipan (and Guam!). We could consider expanding that to include all islands with airports.

If the navy wants to station its reserve transports at Taiwan, I don't see that should be a problem, as long as there either are other free transports or we can get them fast. The navy might consider placing the other transport fleet in the same province as the reserve Gundan, and the 3rd near the most likely army transport need.

While it is the navy's task and privilege to defend the sea, it is this Generals opinion that none of the current fleets will be able to engage and survive an enemy invasion fleet that will include 4-6 CV + 4-6 BB + tons of escorts. Four or five fleets would be needed to successfully engage the enemy.
- Pacified China bust be secured. Once the war is over, the conquered territory must be secured. We will undoubtly see uprisings in this troublesome country, so we will need to leave garrison forces behind. All ports should be occupied to keep the most obvious routes of insertion closed. Mobile forces will be needed to subdue partisans, too. The army will need to provide more detailed plans for these duties.
All mainland ports will be covered by at least 2 gar brigades.
A pacification Gundan consisting of 3 cav is planned to cover east China as far as Golmud and serve as pacification force, the MP's will after the final collapse of the Chinese warlords be split into 1's and cover as many important provinces as possible, ie. those with most factories and rares.
The question is, how many units we will have left after these neccessities have been addressed. We do need to do the math to be able to make the right decisions for the future. It'd be folly to try to go to war with too few forces available and it'd likewise be unwise to throw every unit into the meatgrinder and have the enemy land in our backs or lose China to partisans. So, I again suggest to increase the number of available brigades, dramatically if we need to.
I would like to accommodate you on this point, and I mean really really, the need for garrisons will be enormous and we will not be able to build what we want and at the same time build what is needed to defeat the Soviets, colonial powers and USA navy.

A new strategy for an attack on the Soviets will have to be made, the previous plan has shown some short comings due to experience from the Chinese campaign. On the other hand the recent recall of supplies from the continent at the Emperors orders should improve our chances here.
Since the Russians are busy in the west without much success, we should seriously consider attacking them first and address the western powers later because we might never get another chance like this.

The Soviets are confused at the moment, but might recover in the west, my guess is that they attacked unprepared.
This would not even require us to join the Axis, so we could avoid a two front war. While I personally would like to see the colonial powers driven off, we might not get another so favourable chance against Russia in the forseeable future, so once China is pacified and our troops are in position, we should have a look at the front in Europe to determine whether or not Russia is loosing or winning and then decide where we strike next.

I couldn't agree more, as the Soviets will have half a year more of war production to stop Germany and they would have problems anyway.
Regarding our merchant fleet, I suggest that we agree on a threshold to determine how large our reserve should be. I would suggest that we should have 150 merchants and 30 escorts in reserve at all times. Once we drop below these numbers, we need to build new ships.
If we can make a hunter group or two we might not see the need in the foreseeable future as they might be able to dismantle any threads.
Research:
I do not have any changed recommendations for our research plans and instead avise to adhere the afore sent priority list.

The army will look at its research but agrees on the additions to the common research that the Navy suggested.
 
Memorandum:

Capital ship main armament ---------- Can Accept
Large warship Radar ----------------- Seconded
Small warship Radar ----------------- Seconded
Small warship ASW ------------------ Seconded
CL light armament ------------------- Seconded
Battleship taskforce doctrine --------- Not as to be prioritised
Battleline cruiser doctrine ------------ Can Accept
Capital ship crew training ------------- Can Accept

Additions;

Base Operations
Cruiser Training

Destroyers should not be a priority.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Our current Merchant Fleet build plans should be sufficient for the next two years. We need only review this if we are engaged with another major naval power like the US or Colonial Powers. I don't believe we need any reductions in the current layouts. In principle though I support Admiral Baltasars proposition

In terms of industrial might I would disagree another run of industrial capacity is essential.

For Japan to become the Great Power it should be we need a comparable industrial might to the Colonial Powers such that they shall see us as their equal in Asia. We are not building national industry for the sake of war, we are not building it because it is efficient, we are building it because we are building a new Empire! An Asian Empire. Where the peoples of the east can unite under the banner of the rising sun!

Sure we shall gain additional industry from Chinese occupied lands when we annex them, sure a war with the Soviets will give us some more token gains. Yet it is the home grown industry that shall make us great. If our home islands are comparable to Great Britain no matter how threatening we might be to them by evoking a war economy we shall have the considerable latent strength even when have avenged our honour against the soviets! To make them think twice against starting a new war in asia when we demand their colonial holdings!

We have been at war long enough now to consider a general mobilising of private industry in a war economy. But I suggest we leave the propaganda aside for the moment on mobilising the masses. We should not formally mobilise for war now. That shall just be seen as sabre rattling and warmongering. Afterall we invaded China to teach them a lesson. To unite the Asian people. Not to become the next Attila to be hated by all. Let the 'Angry man of Europe' take that roll while we appear to be much more benevolent. Afterall we can take our foreign correspondents to the infrastructure works we have built in North China to show how we are a force for good.

Invoking a mass mobilisation at our moment of victory will not only be somewhat confusing and unpopular with the people, the rest of the world will look upon us as warmongers of the worst kind. In fact, it would place alongside the already hated Hitler and Stalin. Thus mobilising now makes no political sense.

In fact as a political point if we have a minister would would be appropriate at repairing international relations with an increase in neutrality to distance ourselves from the European fascists it may be worth looking into.

Do we have such a minister in our cabinet who would fill that roll, and what other attributes does he have?

Nomarai is good in his position, yet he is hardly helping our foreign relations.


When we avenge ourselves we can call up the masses, envoke their personal honour. We shall make it the Greatest Japanese war to show once and for all that the Hunter can take on the Bear and the international community will love us as we protect their homes from his ravages! We have a just casus belli. When Mogolia-Xinjing is our puppet, and Manchuria is expanded into Siberia, we will have sphere of influence satellite states creating local buffers and being our border guards in the post central Asian unification. Together we shall stand an imposing unified front.


------------------------------------------
What should we build after two ships are completed in March?

2 new CLs as per last discussion on this matter.

----------------------------------

While I don't particularly see an urgent need for Assault Gun tank destroyers to complement potential future mechanised brigades we are only a couple technologies from being able to produce a home grown variant.

My major reservation is that we are not well endowed in our oil supplies and any mechanised force of size is going to not only consume, but needs to be supplied as well. If we have some spare technological research teams investigating self-propelled anti-tank guns might be worth pursuing.

Given out 5 current motorised divisions, assuming we upgrade these into mechanised, plus a new brigade. We could create three divisions 2xMEC 1xTD (1xLARM) possibly, as a separate armoured corps modelled along German.

However we shall need to look at this in more detail later. Particularly how the army sees itself using such a unit...


Strategic Map of East Russia:
Showing VPs, Possible regions for allied puppet governments, terrain

TheSovietPlan_strategicoverlay.png
 
Last edited:
We would need a statement from the imperial Clerk to have a chance of guessing that, my guess is Chunking and one more should do it.
The Administration is here to administer and serve, but even our most accomplished clerks and quartermasters cannot hope to act as clairvoyants. However, one can say that it is probable that the Chinese will not fall if we simply take e.g. Changde, since we lost important provinces of Baofeng and Chonqging, which boosted Chinese morale and will to fight. The enemy seems determined to fight to the end - the Administration believes that even when the authority of the Chinese nationalists is greatly diminished to the point of them not being able of controlling their population effectively, other cliques will fill the void quickly.

The Administration's opinion is that war in China cannot be regarded as limited war, but as total war, which requires efficient management of all resources at the disposal of the Nation.

In fact as a political point if we have a minister would would be appropriate at repairing international relations with an increase in neutrality to distance ourselves from the European fascists it may be worth looking into.

Do we have such a minister in our cabinet who would fill that roll, and what other attributes does he have?
Konoe Fumimaro could serve well in the dual role of Prime Minister and Foreign Minister.

*Drift due to ideological similarity -5%
NU changes -10%


Also, we could stop supporting the fascists openly by not aligning with them, but the Administration believes that given the popularity of the fascists in the country and the fact that they have big influence in the government and the military, it might not be a prudent move. In fact, the fascists are advocating for an alliance with Germany.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.