I *know* that bad analysis is actually better for the wolves than no analysis, heck, drxav proved that many times in this very game. Honestly, man, you put in so much more work than others yet you got it wrong every single time. It was a sight to see from my position.
What do you mean analysis? Have you seen alanysis in this game? Have you? Cause I haven't. What I did wasn't analysing, it was just hard guessing and testing the resistance of the players. There's no room for analysis when you got 2 days of voting and a bunch of comments.
I did not analyse in this game, I just put to test people and see how they reacted. The real problem was: people not putting effort into it, people doing and saying stupid things and not acting in consequence.
I was pretty sure Tornadoli was a villager, I even thought he was the seer. He asks for my help and promises a scan, then he just ignores me? I sent him 2 or 3 PMs, told him about it in the thread, but he didn't answer. That's bad play and when you play bad, I do my best to get you lynched.
Why was Reis lynched? Because he plays badly, he does his best to look suspicious so the wolves don't hunt him, that's what he does, he even told me a long time ago. Well, you know what, I'd rather have a villager that plays like that dead.
Why was Althacor lynched? He didn't put up enough efforts to defend himself. I just tested him and he gives up after 1 post.
This is a game of deception and information. You have to be tactical. If you play the game to just sit on your arse, wait for the JL to form and just count on being lucky that the seer won't die and he'll scan the wolves for you, then go play somewhere else. You have to go fishing, you have to send PMs, you have to put people to a test.
80% of my play is invisible in the thread as I send PMs and use google chat. The visible part is me fishing for information. As long as I won't get contradiction and counter-analysis, people will die.