Foreign Encroachment –Kiangsu Raided! – Hengzhou Siege - Reorganization
January 1853 to Mid-March 1853
Diplomatic Affairs
Prussia contineud making lots of mutual passage agreements with German states, and placing a merchant in Morocco. Haishenwai was fully pacified, with more troops arriving France, as always, unrelentingly built influence in Cochin and Cambodia, but not yet in Annam. It seems likely they will not take the path of war for that province. Nor would the Empire wish the negative effects of involvement in Cambodia or Cochin – it is Annam, Tonkin and Luang Prabang whose loyalty must remain to the Celestial Empire.
At the beginning of the year, Prussia added to its extensive mutual passage campaign with the German states a promise of local support to Austria. As this was in addition to a defensive treaty in place, this pointed to expectation of an Italian war. The only effect relevant to China might be the French focusing their resources in Europe rather than suborning the chiefs of Cambodia and Cochin China, a process they were pursing with disturbing regularity. Cochin China was thought far away, its possession by China a negative for the country and thus left to the French. However, the French seemed acquisitive and were aggressively penetrating Cambodia as well – would it come to Annam, Luang Prabang, or even Tonkin being French objects? Given the limited number of trained diplomats available, achieving good relations and then a defensive alliance should be the objective. Among other things, it would allow pacification of natives by Chinese troops – a benefit to the locals, of course, and also providing increased Colonial Penetration that would allow the restoration of a vassal relationship.
Shortly thereafter, news came of a short term casus belli between Khiva and Russia. Russian aggression came as no surprise, but a Khivan war offered hope of distraction. It also indicated Russian troops heading closer to China.
In March came confirmation that the USA had forced a trade treaty from the Japanese. The Japanese having often been a stubborn and contentious vassal and tributary state, the ministries are confident there will be further difficulty in the Japan-US relationship.
Pacification
The battle against the rebels continued through the winter, facing a fresh set of uprisings in Hunan centered around Wujiang as well as the formation of a Taiping city in Anshun (West Hunan). Rumors attributed this rising to the man claiming to be the Devil Hong as he retreated from Nanning across the Guangxi border to Nanpang in Hunan. The fighting in Hunan and Guangxi went against the rebels in general, but despite losses they remained in formed bodies in the field, spreading misery from region to region. At the beginning of February Her Chyun, who had arrived at Hengzhou, was sent north to Changsha with Southwest Army and arrived in time to anticipate a large revolt. The rebels were routed and lost very heavily, but Her was criticized later and lost seniority for the level of loss he sustained. In February Wujiang also saw fierce fighting in repeated battles, the Devils being eliminated and the town secured – which raised the status of Southwestern Army Group sub-commander Jiang Zuo Zongtang.
In the east, a surprise wave of pillage from undetected Devil raiders in February and March spread across Kiangsu north of the Yangtze, on the coast and inland, coming from the important south bank regions of Shanghai, Suzhou and Nanking. They lacked local Taiping support, but were able to bypass the few garrisons south of the river and terrorize the north – pillaging 7 mostly populous regions. That there were no forces on hand to find the raiders was attributed to the great concentration of troops in the Yangtze Army against the Devil Xiao, but it was clear that a reorganization of responsibilities soon was needed to prevent recurrence of such outrages.
Loyalty Levels
The general loyalty level seen in China, and which may be the default, is 85% Chinese, 15% Rebel (local rebel affiliations vary). These rebels sometimes reach 25% without uprising, but percentages rise dramatically when they seize control. As described above, they are readily suppressed with strength, and may decide to retreat or make peace to avoid combat.
In Taiping-infested regions it is almost always the case that Chinese Loyalty declines to 35% and Taiping goes to 50%., with other “Rebel” remaining at 15%. In some places, probably rural or largely rural regions, the Chinese percentage falls to 10% and the Taiping rises accordingly to 75%, which may be linked to successful seizure of control one or more times by the Taiping. The exception currently is Nantong, rural, 85% Chinese and 15% Rebel Loyalty, but Taiping-controlled (easily since there is no town).
Small Levy units are cheap and available to raise in order to garrison everywhere there is any danger, but the regiments are too small to hold the countryside and may not hold out in town against a rebel force of any size, and the “Warband” size is too large and otherwise useful to be tied down in garrison except for important centers.
It is suspected that regaining control does not reduce Taiping Loyalty immediately, but bloody battles with local Devils do seem to have an effect that if sufficient may remove the Taiping sympathy and restore the usual 85%/15% division explained above.
Hengzhou Campaign
Although most activity was involved in suppressing the rebels through the regions, the focus of Imperial attention and power was the siege of Hengzhou and the elimination of the Devil Xiao along with his forces. It was unfortunate that several active and skillful offensive commanders had fallen under the Taiping influence, and preventing them from breaking out across the country was a critical concern. The siege was thus diligently maintained by an overwhelming force around the city in deeply dug trenches.
War is sometimes a matter of incidents that echo with consequences. On January 18 it appears that a detachment of Devils fled or stole toward Hengzhou through the defenses of Yuan Shuai Guanwen’s small army, which engaged it and resulted in an aggravated battle between the armies. The Imperial besiegers amounted to 150,000 men and 162 against 42,000 men and 30 cannons defending. However, with the portion of the Imperial forces engaged being limited at first, and lacking supplemental batteries (which were all with He at that time), the Imperial forces were roughly handled and lost 6816 men against 3485 Devils. On the 27th battle resumed for reasons unclear, Chinese losses of 18,000 and 24 cannon with many prisoners suffered as against only 5765 Rebels. National Morale, which had over the course of the rebellion slowly declined, sank another point. A further skirmish followed as Her Chyun’s forces had marched to the guns and joined Guanwen, whose blood was up and who pressed for a continued assault while the enemies cohesion was reduced and as many supplies must have been consumed. In addition, the calendar was sanguine for victory, as it was also auspicious for the declaration of a Vassal Status in Amur, and it was suggested that a decisive victory would revive national morale. It was true that the Elite Devils were at less than a third of their full power and intelligence showed other units were weakened, but many details were unclear.
Guanwen offered no objection to formal combination of the Yangtze and the small Southwestern Army Groups (the Southeastern Army to be sent to Changsha for reasons of command precedence) into a unitary siege command provided he could lead an assault. He Guiqing calculated and agreed to attack in February, though retaining official command of the Yangtze Army.
Despite this consent, He issued conflicting orders and the entire besieging force reverted to a defensive posture in early February. He explained that it would be a courtesy to await the arrival of officials from Peking before commencing the assault. This privately infuriated Guanwen, as it gave time to the enemy to recover cohesion. A plan of combined operation was re-confirmed and definite orders given for the attack mid-month when the official observers arrived, most desiring to be seen in visible proximity to battle but without facing actual danger. The assault began on snowy February 17 assault on a snowy day with substantial losses on both sides, some prisoners taken by the Devils, and a tactical stalemate. As planned, the attacks were repeated almost daily with anxious concern, and on the 21st the tide seemed to turn in Guanwen’s favor, as the day went well, the Chinese army lost no deserters or prisoners, and indeed 16 Taiping elements were destroyed with 7800 prisoners taken captive for later execution. Snow or rain, the attacks continued.
The Ten Battles of Hengzhou in late February resulted in Xiao’s forces being eroded down to a fraction of their former strength. Although at month-end they recovered some cohesion from what proved to be a large stockpile and a large collection of supply wagons, the besiegers had been having the advantage in each attack. The Six Battles of March finished off the Devils and many Supply Wagons were taken as useful trophies when the city was overrun. Even after replacement, the besieging armies amounted to only 100,000 men and 160 cannon at the end of the siege.
Although Xiao’s body had not been confirmed to have been found, both troops and generals of the Army Groups involved experienced a quiet exultation on the fall of the city and regarding this as a signal triumph foredooming all Taiping Devils to a prompt fiery damnation. Outside the army, however, the feeling was one of patient forebearance finally relieved – why and how did it take so long for the might of the Manchu to reduce a single rebel city? What weakness accounted for the delay, and might Taipings, other traitors and troublemakers elsewhere take heart from the long resistance? National Morale did not rise, but neither did it sink further below an alarming 78. He Guiqing’s reputation was not enhanced as he hoped it would be by the victory, but neither was that of Guanwen, who acquired from this battle and his campaign against the rebels a maliciously ill-rumored blood lust that spared neither friend nor foe.
It should be noted that the great Imperial advantage in cannon could not be brought to bear fully in snow and rain, and that the army was able to gain an advantage even though the rebels continued to fight like Devils. Assuming the leadership all perished, and none escaped for an opportunistic “resurrection” elsewhere, the rebels had lost their focus –their principal city and army at Hengzhou.
Military Reorganization
One important rationale for storming Hengzhou was that it would free the concentration of besiegers for other purposes, including frontier defense and a deterrent to Russian aggression. The First Grand Secretary for War and some other officials had travelled by sea and river to observe the continuing siege and were present to discuss the matter after the Fall of Xiao on March 7 (though he had not led the entire defence, allowing some of the other very active rebel generals to command, he had been seen in action in March – however, was not yet found, living or dead).
It was advanced by Peking, that a balanced definition of military districts would not burden some with threats and others include only quiet areas, so that each should be organized and prepared for responsibility as to certain threats and given other sectors which might expect to remain pacific. The relationship of CinC abilities to Theater limits was carefully considered – the relevant theaters being China, Northeast Asia, Eastern Siberia, Central Asia, and, beyond the border except to the west of Ulan Bator, Central Siberia.
Six Military Districts (and corresponding army groups)
(#1) North: Sichuan, Henan, Hebei, Shandong, E. Mongolia (Jehol), Manchuria, Amur, Korea (China & Northeast Asia & Eastern Siberia Theaters)–Mission vs Russia , capital defense and general strategic reserve
Yuan Shuai He Guiqing 3-2-2 (By the Book CinC Bonus-Disabled)
Shuai Zeng Guofan (3-4-2) Aggressive Strategist, +1 Str +1 Att +1 Qual if CinC; Admired: +25% fatigue recovery to stack he commands
Jiang Zhang YuLiang (3-2-2)
(#2) Kunlun: Shanxi, Gansu, Western Mongolia, and all areas to the west and north (China & Northeast Asia & Central Asia & Central Siberia & Eastern Siberia Theaters)–Mission: Russia defense and monitor vs. Irkutsk area; cover western colonies; banditry.
Yuan Shuai Xiang Rong (3-2-0) Vainglorious if active CiC: +1 Qual, +10 Coh to all land cmdrs; Admired: +25% stack fatigue recovery; Arrogant: -2 CmdP if in stack
Jiang Zuo Zongtang (3-3-2) Asst Logistician: +10% reduced supply if in stack; Diplomatic: +1 CmdP +1 CmdP Per ability above 1 if in command of stack; Scorched Earth when capturing cities or occupying enemy regions.
(#3) Yangtze (China Theater): Wuhan, Anhui, Kiangsu and Jiangxi–Mission: Local security of provinces along lower Yangtze
Shuai Xu Youren (4-1-2) (By the Book CinC Bonus-Disabled)
Jiang Sengge Rinchen (3-3-1) Hussar +20% Assault, +5% fire for Cav if in stack if clear, woods, hills, steppes or desert; Defiant -2CmdP to stack he is in (promotable)
(#4) Central (China Theater): Hunan and Guizhou: Mission: Local security of provinces on upper Yangtze
Shuai Liu Jian-Ling (4-1-1) (By the Book CinC Bonus-Disabled)
Jiang Zhang Guoliang (4-4-0) Feu Tactician: +20% Def fire , +1 Prot for attached Unit (whole stack) if active, +3% form square; Hotheaded: If cmdg, won’t orderretreat in first 2 turns.
(#5) Southeast (China Theater): Zhejiang, Fukien, Taiwan, Guangdong and Hainan and primary control of naval forces. Mission: Local security; coastal, naval, and overseas protection; troops transport; anti-piracy action.
Yuan Shuai Her Chyun (4-2-2)
(#6) Southwest (China Theater): Guangxi and Yunnan. Mission: Local security of southwest and border security.
Yuan Shuai Guanwen (4-5-2) CinC: Genius Str, Init and Frontage bonus, Level 3 Good Commander +1 CmdP per ability for stack he commands, Good Admin +15% fatigue recovery for stack he commands
Jiang Zhou Tengso (3-2-1)