Personally, I think the only time that a Leader should be able to save themselves is if they are TIED with someone else, and only by removing themselves from the TIE.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Personally, I think the only time that a Leader should be able to save themselves is if they are TIED with someone else, and only by removing themselves from the TIE.
Argh...lame.
Lemeard must die.
Everyone, Lemeard is STILL OUTED. Anyone not voting Lemeard ought to have very good reasons for doing so...
VOTE LEMEARD
Lemeard must die.
Everyone, Lemeard is STILL OUTED. Anyone not voting Lemeard ought to have very good reasons for doing so...
VOTE LEMEARD
I know, I even picked one of the suggestions from that discussion in the General WW thread. I decided on the suggestion involving the least amount of maths which, in hindsight, might not have been the best of the lot.
oI don't really mind if someone can use the leader trait to save himself but the problem is that the game lose pace if everyone is just repeating the same bandwagon two days in a row. Once is bad enough (but of course the JL needs an outing followed by a bandwagon now and then to win the game).
VOTE Lemeard
I doubt it will happen, but it would be pretty hilarious if either Lem turns out to be a villager, or one of his packmates is now the leader and saves him again.
I doubt it will happen, but it would be pretty hilarious if either Lem turns out to be a villager, or one of his packmates is now the leader and saves him again.
Vote Lemeard
Yep.
Unfortunately, convincing people to change rules that have been in use for years the way they are now is pretty tough, it seems.
As can be witnessed by my own pet peeve - the cultist. ;-)
I presume Lemeard has good reasons to not vote Lemeard.
Well, at least everyone agrees on something then
Next game we should get a revised version in. "Three votes once per game" or what have you.
Yep.
Unfortunately, convincing people to change rules that have been in use for years the way they are now is pretty tough, it seems.
As can be witnessed by my own pet peeve - the cultist. ;-)
I presume Lemeard has good reasons to not vote Lemeard.
I know, I even picked one of the suggestions from that discussion in the General WW thread. I decided on the suggestion involving the least amount of maths which, in hindsight, might not have been the best of the lot.
I don't really mind if someone can use the leader trait to save himself but the problem is that the game lose pace if everyone is just repeating the same bandwagon two days in a row. Once is bad enough (but of course the JL needs an outing followed by a bandwagon now and then to win the game).
Well, at least everyone agrees on something then
Next game we should get a revised version in. "Three votes once per game" or what have you.
Yes. Lemeard is obviously bad news for the village. After we kill him we should take a look at those who voted him eldergirl?
Vote Lemeard
Vote Lemeard
and number three...
Vote Lemeard
Also note how Eldeman Lemeard = Eternaly_Lost (twice EL) ?
Vote Lemeard
Also note how Eldeman Lemeard = Eternaly_Lost (twice EL) ?
Unless his pack is stupid, I doubt they banded together to give him his title. Too much risk for too little (likely no) gain.
another boring day is boring
vote Lemeard
all the cool kids are doing it.
Now, about Lemeard, are you suggesting he is an SA cultist, with leader (from the elector vote) trait and hunter trait? If so, I would agree. I wouldn't be surprised to see see sorcery or seerish powers, either.
seeing what the other two baddies (cultist and wolf) had in the way of traits, this seems to be very trait heavy game.
