((I was just kidding ))
Well I am most happy with the results thus far.
Actually you were right I checked it it was coined by a pole who lived 1900-1945 it think.
((I was just kidding ))
Well I am most happy with the results thus far.
Is he allowed to run again if he wins this election?
The limit is 3 terms it think
Actually, I think it's 2 terms, just like IRL
Actually it was only limited in the 1950s when Truman was in charge.
Is he allowed to run again if he wins this election?
No. Even though it's not illegal in 1845, it was still common courtesy for presidents to only serve two terms. Only FDR ever served more, and that was a very special circumstance of Depression-WWII.
((FDR would like a chat with you.Actually, I think it's 2 terms, just like IRL
Maybe all this talk of a tans-continental railroad could be waited until after the elections and the war is won, then a plan for where the railroad would be built could be made, thus settling many details of this plan and paving the way for a sooner building of such railroad.
Maybe all this talk of a tans-continental railroad could be waited until after the elections and the war is won, then a plan for where the railroad would be built could be made, thus settling many details of this plan and paving the way for a sooner building of such railroad.
Or maybe we are talking about making something out of land that is currently overwhelmingly empty. What use to us is any of this land if almost no one lives there and it's completely undeveloped. Developing it without needing to raise a cent of taxes is not only good for the nation but overwhelmingly beneficial to the local residents. Who's rights are being defended here? It's a very simple matter to put the railroad through the vast majority of the fertile land in the west that is currently unoccupied.
Any settlement would cut down on this size, and settlement of the West is inevitable with the growing populations (even if it were just the Indians themselves). The actual railroads themselves would take up very little grazing land away from the buffalo directly.What about the roaming herds of buffalo and the natives that live off of those herd's survival? Would not the railroad quickly cut down the size of land available for these buffalo to roam, thus diminishing their size and that too of the natives? I have no love for these savages, after years of fighting them for our nation, but they do not deserve such a fate as death by starvation.