• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
The Great War
1913: The War of Movement

Terrance informed the man on the other end of the phone that the United States would indeed honor its alliance. Once he put down the receiver, the President then called for his cabinet to assemble in the Oval Office while he informed congress of the state of affairs. In front of 535 Representatives and Senators, Terrance said that “there comes a time when each and every nation is called upon to answer for it past promises; to keep them, or throw them by the wayside. Recently, I informed a man in Paris that the United States will always keep its promises, and so, we are now at war with the Empires of the Triple Alliance”.
Over the next three weeks, the nation was awoken to the news of war, while generals and statesmen in Washington deliberated on what the United States’ role would be in the conflict. Through numerous plans proposed in the myriad cabinet and military meetings the president attended, the Harrison-Terrance Plan arose. Drafted by the Secretary of State based on the views of generals and Secretary of Defense Ecossais [1], and tweaked by the President, the Plan called for American action on almost every conceivable front.
It was presented to congress in the same session as the legislation that would come to define the Great War for the American people. The American Conscription Act and War Economy Act were both essentially unprecedented, especially the latter. The WEA faced opposition mostly due to Article II which repealed the right to strike in industries “vital to the war effort”. Labor Unions and the Democratic Party lobby both condemned it.
The WEA however, was supported by the Federal Party, and those who believed in the doing what was necessary to in the war. The Republican Party did see a major split in the ranks over Article I’s handover of control to the government over private industries, but mostly ended up supporting the bill. WEA passed 280-94 in the House, with Republican and Federal opposition mostly abstaining.
The ACA however, was the more controversial bill. A draft had last been ordered by President Jeremiah Williams more than 50 years earlier in 1860, when the nation was three years into its bloodiest war. Even then, it had been controversial, now the possibility of conscription inflamed the passions of congress. Eventually, ACA passed by a thin margin of 200-167 with Federal votes. At the time, most Americans considered the bills to be necessary to win the war, but slowly they became lightning rods for Americans’ issues with the conflict.

kmccahill.jpg

1. Kevin McCahill, creator of the ACA.​

Almost immediately after the ACA and WEA were passed on July 27th, the machinery of war went into full gear. The Department of Industry issued an order for a million rifles from almost every American arms manufacturer, rifles that would have to be bolt-action. Airplane manufacturers began demanding funds for the creation of combat aircraft, carmakers for armored vehicles and artillery, and young men began to get their names drawn out of a hat in the state draft lotteries.
To make all this possible, money was needed, and that was one commodity of which the United States did not have a shortage. However, as the days ticked by, Secretary of the Treasury Fitz Harrison noticed that even the massive surplus of the US Treasury Department might not be enough for the job. While the government would indeed survive without loans through 1913 and 14, “Fitz” began drafting up the idea for a more reliable banking industry in the fall of the Great War’s first year.
Meanwhile, the war that prompted him to do this was entering its first phase, known as “The War of Movement”. In 1913, the United States Army grew from 441,000 regulars to some 1 million men, pushed up from the Terrance-Harrison Plan’s initial 811,000 soldiers as plans were revised due to Italian failures and underestimated Chilean strength. In the drafts that created the new divisions and armies which would fight the Great War, the first combat experience came for American forces.
The Battle of Walsh Street begun on August 16th in Chicago, when the local communist party organized a protest against the draft with every member they could muster. The 23rd Infantry Division, quartered ten miles outside the city after its formation two weeks earlier, was called in to break up the protest. When they arrived however, they found Walsh Street barricaded, and the communists firing at them with weapons. The protest had spun out of control after the crowd had taken up the chant of revolution. Walsh Street, the seat of the Chicago City Council, had soon become covered in guns passed out by hardliners.
The 23rd Infantry’s commander, Major General Buckner, attempted to negotiate, but was rebuked by a bullet that skimmed off his helmet, and an accusation of being imperialist scum. Buckner then ordered his troops, who had only just been taught how to fire their guns, to clear out Walsh Street by any means necessary. The brutal urban battle that erupted after the communists opened fire on the advancing 23rd spilled over into 3 different districts, and ended in the deaths of 732 infantrymen and 1,492 communists.

wobblies.jpg

2. A Democratic Party-funded re-enactment photograph of the Battle of Walsh Street.​

In later years “Walsh Street” became a synonym to many for the wrongs of the Great War. In August 1913 however, the nation denounced it as a despicable attempt at harming the war effort as it was starting to get going. The draft continued, and in October 1913, 350,000 American troops left Washington for France, one month after the United States Occupational Force in Peru had been transported to the coast of Northern Chile to perform an amphibious invasion near Arequipa.
While American forces were still crossing the Atlantic, Europe had already delved right into the traumatic hell of modern warfare. In July 1913, the German army had crossed over the border in Alsace-Lorraine into France, and Austro-Hungarian forces had swarmed through Lombardia into Northern Italy. The initial fighting around the borders lasted only a few days before the Tripartite forces forced breakthroughs on both fronts, yet managed to cost some 68,000 lives on both sides.
The next two months in France were spent in a complete panic. The German armies made fast progress in the Franche-Comte, and headed up the Franco-Belgian border in their attempts to outflank the French armies in Northern France. In early October however, the French rallied, stopping the German armies in the south in a series of engagements on the Troyes-Dijon axis. French High Command then ordered a general advance in the south, which threw the battered offenders off guard, and saw German forces pushed back to a line stretching from Montbeliard, on the Swiss border, to Saint-Dizier. Here the war of movement ended for the French southern front.

rally1913.jpg

3. Painting of a French assault near Saint-Dizier.​

In the north, the addition of some 100,000 Dutch troops buoyed the efforts of the German armies by freeing up extra divisions for the drive on Paris. It was in this last ditch German effort to deal a quick knockout blow that the French army saw its finest hour since the days of Napoleon. The final push for Paris began at dawn on October 13th, even as the southern German forces seemed to face imminent collapse. The next one-and-a-half months of fighting would add another 42,000 German and 53,000 French soldiers to the death toll of 1913 [2].
The German advance began slowly and only bogged down further as the weeks dragged on. In the end, German forces came within some 10 miles of Paris, holding a line of battle stretching from Meaux to Saint-Witz at the tip of their spearhead. However, 380,000 American soldiers landing at ports from Dieppe to Amiens and heading south to reinforce Paris prompted the Germans to call off the offensive and pull back to more defensible positions.
As it turned out, US troops saw no large-scale combat in 1913. That however, was sure to change in 1914 as US forces in Chile drew closer to Santiago and the battered state of the French military left more and more gaps that US troops would likely have to fill. For American military planners though, the Italian front posed a more immediate problem. With Italian forces having collapsed spectacularly, and nobody else being available to support them, the American Armed Forces seemed poised to take on a larger role than ever imagined by the President or his cabinet in the dark meeting of June 15th.

[1] – The invasion of Vladivostok was added after Secretary Ecossais proposed opening a Russian front at a meeting on June 30th.

[2] – French and German analysts estimate that combat-related casualties in 1913 numbered some 143,000 for the French and 152,000 for the Germans.

------------------------------

Exceptional Situation(s):

I hope the tone of that last paragraph tells you what’s ahead. We are going to be messing in Italy a lot next year.

For now however, it’s time for a short planning session again. Bills may be proposed.
 
What I propose today is a simple but important change in our governmental arrangement. The creation of a body designed to act as the connecting bridges of the federal government and as the railroads connect cities this body shall connect together our departments. Communication and strategic thought is vital to our victory in this war, this shall be yet another tool in our arsenal.

Federal Executive Act

Article 1. A Federal Executive Bureau is to be created.

Article 2. The bureau shall be tasked with ensuring sufficient communication between departments is kept.

Article 3. The bureau shall be tasked with ensuring sufficient communication between federal and state governments is kept.

Article 4. The bureau shall provide for the creation of joint-commitees on issues that are relevant to multiple departments.

Article 5. The bureau shall be conferred with responsibility to co-ordinate policy and offer strategic direction to individual departments as part of wider government policy.

Article 6. The bureau shall be charged with maintaining the internal secrecy of confedential federal documents.

Article 7. The head of the Federal Executive Bureau is to be the Vice President.​

((The Federal Executive Bureau would later inspire the creation of the Cabinet Office in the United Kingdom; one of the essential administrative reforms to improve efficiency for the war.))
 
We have been dragged into a horrible mess. Not only have we seen the death of many americans under american guns, but we have doomed us! I hope Terrance gets what he deserves..

But we are already here and I don't have any reason to attack my government. I'm afraid we are not going to peace out of this war because a southern man wills it.
 
I have seen the beauty! The battlefields of Chile, the piles of the bodies of our enemies. Nothing can be more beautiful. And the bravery I see among my comrades. The glorious battles, and the heroic deaths. My friends, we are making history. We are approaching a new era, as a better and stronger nation. This war is only the beginning. I feel it. Nothing can hold us back anymore.

Major Jerry Nightmore, corresponding from Chile to the True American (an Entente Party aligned newspaper).
 
I support the Federal Executive Act. Communication is important in these times.

((speaking of communication, the recap has been updated to the most recent events))
 
Last edited:
I wish to propose two bills to the house;

The Trading with the Enemy Act
(i) All trade between inhabitants of the United States and enemies is hereby declared illegal.
(ii) Anyone found in breach of this law will be liable to fine or imprisonment for up to the duration that we are at war.
(iii) Enemies are classed as any state that this country is at war with, the inhabitants of these countries and any companies trading in these countries.
(iv) Trading is classed as the sharing of capital, goods or information from one party to another, with or without benefit to the sending party.

The Strategic Sites Act
(i) All sites owned or operated on by the Department of Defence are declared strategic sites.
(ii) Anyone trespassing on these sites can be imprisoned for up to five years.
(iii) Other installations, such as intelligence agencies or sites run by the Department of Industry, can apply to become strategic sites.
(iv) Applications will be addressed by the Strategic Sites sub-Committee (SSC) of the National Work Board
(v) The SSC shall be comprised of 20 members; 10 members of congress (from all parties represented and both houses), 5 members of the Department of Defence (representing all branches of the military) and 5 members of the Department of Industry
(vi) The SSC can call industrialists, defence staff and other parties concerned to give presentations and answer questions, but as they wouldn't be full members, they aren't entitled to vote.
(vii) Failure to attend a summons can entail fines of up to $1000
(viii) Strategic Site Licenses for property not owned by the government agencies must be renewed by the SSC every 5 years
(ix) This law will expire if not renewed within one year of the secession of hostilities with Germany and Russia

Sec. K McCahill

((I like the moustache, but it looks like my jackets in need of replacement; I've never been very keen on checked jackets! Who's up for a trip to the shops?))

PS I support the Federal Executive Act...
 
Last edited:
I think article ii of the Trading with the Enemy Act may be a bit harsh for an act dealing with any kind of trade to citizens or governments of enemy nations. While such things like arms deals to enemy governments, or important weapons information trades, may make wartime imprisonment reasonable - it could be misused. Having people in prison for the duration of a war for less dangerous trading activities would be an unnecessary burden and a rather arbitrary sentence. I think prison times and other punishments should be set to known durations of time, as in other criminal activities, and there should be more distinction between the severities of different actions.
 
This actions at Walsh Street were utterly atrocious, and precisely why a draft is wrong on every level, and this new proposal is little more than a gross extension of an already bloated government. as are the bills proposed by Secretary McCahill. I will oppose all measures.
 
So you support communists who want to topple our democratic government and install a socialist proletarian dictatorship and accuse us of harboring a bloated government all in the same statement. Fascinating.
 
Those damn Communists, all the way overseas, who have no invaded us...

So let's go over there and kill them all? And let our soldiers die? All so we can feel good and say we stopped Communism from spreading? It is in my opinion the government is operating outside its mandate. Nay, the government is going out of its way to put its own citizens at risk.

I join those other Senators who remain opposed to the government's wars.
 
I support the right of the individual to not be cowed by government into fighting a war that is none of their, or the government's, business.
 
Those damn Communists, all the way overseas, who have no invaded us...

So let's go over there and kill them all? And let our soldiers die? All so we can feel good and say we stopped Communism from spreading? It is in my opinion the government is operating outside its mandate. Nay, the government is going out of its way to put its own citizens at risk.

I join those other Senators who remain opposed to the government's wars.
I believe you are mistaking the Communists who were by no means overseas and did barricade and distribute weapons to disrupt the city of Chicago, leading to much bloodshed, with the Emperors of Europe who have made clear their disdain for democratic rights and peace itself, and have declared war to destroy such things. It's unfortunate that the communists, who declare a desire for a proletarian dictatorship, subverted what could have been a peaceful and reasonable protest - and unfortunate that such fresh troops were involved in trying to contain it.
 
"Unfortunate" is a word used when a child spills juice on the carpet or for other innocent mistakes made by the well-meaning, not for gruesome atrocities perpetrated on American citizens by their own army. That the President of the United States blithely permits his military commanders to ruthlessly suppress protest movements with conscripts is not just an outrage against the rights of due process, it is an usurpation of civil law enforcement authority and an unmistakable sign that this administration is truly uninterested in the welfare of the working man. If this President truly cared about the farmer or the factory worker, he would have reined in his bloodthirsty attack dog Buckner and instead attempted peaceful negotiation. Instead, I'm sure he'll trot out some ridiculous platitude about the "needs of the war", as though it somehow excuses the Walsh Street Massacre.

As governor of Illinois and the elected representative of those killed, I call upon President Terrance to relieve Major General Buckner of his command and have him put before a court-martial, so that he might answer for his murderous rampage through the streets of Chicago.
 
Buckner did indeed attempt to negotiate before being shot at, and communist weapons were the first fired. It was blatantly the communists who caused the bloodshed and anyone who attempts to use this tragedy for political gains should be ashamed of themselves.
 
Seems like using his death as an excuse for war is using his death for political gains. You act like people were declaring war on us, and yet it was us who brought conflict to war.
 
I fear we will have more events like the ones in Chicago the longer we are at war and the more the government takes control of the people's lives. We are in a war of choice on other continents. This is bringing the violence of Europe onto our shores. We must make an honorable peace and leave the Europeans to their own devices.

Senator Johnson - Illinois (R)
 
Apologies, I had meant to imply that they were liable for up to the duration of the war - this will be rectified!
 
The tragedy in Chicago wounds the heart of every American. If the investigation of the event bears out the version that is told to us, in no way should MG Buckner be held responsible for what occurred. If the Reds indeed fired on him and his men while he was attempting to negotiate, then he was defending the lives of his men and innocent civilians, and restoring order to othe city. I support the right of the protestors to gather and redress grievances with the government, but when they bear arms against soldiers, civilians, and elected officials of the Republic, they are to be treated as enemy soldiers. We must let government work in the future and not foment open rebellion in the streets; this can serve no one's purposes but the tyrants that would seek to enslave Europe.

That said, what movements have the Russians and British made in the war? We must get the British actively involved in supporting France. Furthermore, the Triiple Alliance must not be allowed to overrun Italy - the loss of naval bases and ports in the Mediterranean would be catastrophic for the strategic balance in Europe. We also must not allow this war to devolve into a stationary war of attrition. We must make all efforts to implement movement and fluidity into the lines to ensure we maintain initiative and can dictate battle on our own terms. I am proud of my soldiers in the 3rd Infantry Division. We stood strong outside of Paris with our French allies. We are ready to stand firm again wherever we are sent. No enemy of freedom is too big or too far for us to secure victory.

Major General Walter Mandrake
3rd Infantry Division
 
Last edited:
May I suggest that the Strategic Sites Act be amended so that the SSC also includes representatives of industry.
 
So you support communists who want to topple our democratic government and install a socialist proletarian dictatorship and accuse us of harboring a bloated government all in the same statement. Fascinating.

No, he supports peace! I also oppose such a draft, forcing young men to abandon their jobs and families to fight in a pointless war for imperialist motives. They did not seek to establish a dictatorship, they just defended themselves from a compulsatory draft that will send them to a certain death. They love the country as much as you and me do, but they are not heartless jingos like yourself. I am a conservative, but every day I am more alienated by their actions. At the end of the year I will be ashamed of even being considered a conservative.

What happened to God? These soldiers are all our brothers and we are all the same in the eyes of the Lord, but we keep treating them like pieces in a grand board game. Whatever happened to the inalienable rights of man? Our founding fathers would be disappointed to see us wrecking havoc abroad with little justification and sending our men to die against their will, overriding their right to deny and work.

Yet industries are siezed against their owners' wills in the name of war and men are kidnapped in the name of war.