I think Brass will be the man that will carry out the necessary reforms to end slavery.
Under President Cameron, it is now against the law for any reforms to be made abolishing slavery.
I think Brass will be the man that will carry out the necessary reforms to end slavery.
I think Brass will be the man that will carry out the necessary reforms to end slavery.
You do not need to vote for President Walsh, as he is the only nominee for the Democrat ticket, and this is just the primary, not the actual election.
I think Brass will be the man that will carry out the necessary reforms to end slavery.
Under President Cameron, it is now against the law for any reforms to be made abolishing slavery.
I don't have any particular problem with Senator Carr. But Jerimiah Brass has been a leading and vocal member of our party's political debates for so long that I and many other members of the party can trust him implicitly. When one is in the enviable position of having multiple options without any flaws, one naturally will gravitate towards the more familiar option.
- I am a strong supporter of fortifications and naval build up rather than asserting power through assimilating territory or creating sattelites (such as these proposed Cuban adventures). However I believe these fortifications should be based on external defense (our coastline and borders) rather than internal defense - why the internal reaches of the South would need forts as the former SNP suggested is beyond me. I don't believe our enemies our within, we're all Americans after all.
As a military man I will answer this. All the Cities I mentioned that were in the interior are major rail junctions (Chatanooga, Memphis, Richmond, Atlanta) and as such would be the immediate target of a foriegn invasion if the Coastal Cities were taken. A mobile Defense in Depth is the key to modern warfare. I would also like to point out that I specifically constructed my brief presidential bid to include a precisely equal number of Northern and Southern Cities. The Geography of new england and the old northwest means that most large cities in those areas are coastal and the terrain is less conductive to a defense in depth.
In addition, what is your specific objection to the SNM now? The Joint Militia Limitation Act rendered it nigh impossible to use politically and it has acted both as a extremely effective law enforcement tool and has served well in combat against the evil bean-eating forces of ex-dictator Santa Anna.
The objection is that the Southern states as a whole shouldn't have a militia. After all, why should what is more or less a region have a whole militia? It should be broken down into indiviual state militias.