((Which is why I edited that comment after making it to be out of charachter and jokingly))
((good, good, it wasnt changed when i typed my thing. better safe then giving the opposition ammo to use against us))
((Which is why I edited that comment after making it to be out of charachter and jokingly))
Sir, might I ask how this coincides with previous comments that we must (I am afraid I must paraphrase ((as it was several pages back and I can't find it)) ) "accept" that the south was a "different culture" and had to be treated differently (that is, by giving them more power and military might).had offered the Union a chance of peace between North and South, we wanted to usher in a Second Era of Good feelings, where North and South worked together, and acted as one country, one people.
The economy thrived under Mr. King, with a great expansion in all areas - a great change from under Jackson. Perhaps it was only a minor change as of yet, but such things take time (we cannot suddenly place people into factories just as we cannot suddenly declare slaves to be free - and King was the first who promoted this expansion of industry in such a way - not to demean former presidents, but the idea of industrializing the south by such methods was only recently brought to the attention of Congress and other officials like you and me).Let us not forget, that even though many Whigs and Democrats continue to grumble about this so-called "discrimination" in the military the Davis Compromise was almost overwhelmingly voted into law with only a few "No"s. If the core value of this Union party is hatred towards what we in the SNP and the rest of the South see as equal treatment towards us in an institution as old as the Constitution then why do so many Whigs and Democrats who supported the Compromise now side with the Union party? Would it not have been much more to your party's pleasing to form your own Compromise on the basis of the Davis Compromise but with the military aspects of it let out? And I do not see how we took action to force this Compromise into law. It was voted by Congress legally and with all interested parties present. And as has been repeated time after time along with the Militia Bill, the SNM in no way acts on orders of the SNP or on what it views as would be in the best interests of the SNP. It is a purely regional National Guard force to police the South in times of peace and support the Federal Army with the defense of Southern Cities and Ports in times of war. I do apologize for labeling all of the members of the Union party as pushing for instant-abolition and "act-now" demanders. It is just my viewpoint that not enough was shown by the end of Mr. King's term as president to show that he had even attempted to improve the industry of the South away from the Cotton industry.
-Nicolas Khur, Inspector-General of the SNM, Commanding-Officer of the U.S. Dragoons
((my job is being outsourced to Southerners!))((Which is why the leadership of our party are Military men for the most part, it is our job to herd angry mobs with guns in the correct directions and keep them under control!))
Sir, might I ask how this coincides with previous comments that we must (I am afraid I must paraphrase ((as it was several pages back and I can't find it)) ) "accept" that the south was a "different culture" and had to be treated differently (that is, by giving them more power and military might).
((Wow, that's a lot of votes. Also, the SNP would have lost even had we broken into Free Soil, Moderates, and Democrats?Current tally:
Union Party: 12 (There will definitely be no Union Party next election)
SNP: 3 (You'll get a second chance).
Well, considering that the person in charge was King before, who was hardly a tyrant of Southern slavery, and the vote does not count for the Congressional runs (which are no doubt showing some support for the SNP among former Democrats in the south, although maybe not as much as predicted), I would hardly say that anyone is being "thrown out" (much less that all of them are tyrants, of course).Good job countrymen, for throwing the tyrants of Southern slavery out of the federal government! Do not allow them to keep on thriving, strike at the heart of hatred while they are weak!
This country was based on the hard work and cooperation of many peoples. Let us commit again to refusing to discriminate with building codes or limited citizenships or other such unnecessary chains on our diverse people, coming into the land of liberty recently, or here for centuries before us.Really? Give us details about the plight of these immigrants, and soon-to-be President Cameron will surely do much to rectify it.
((I suggest you lay down your senate title until later, as it makes no sense for a senator not to be from one of the main parties, also what's your age and all that other stuff?))
((Wow, that's a lot of votes. Also, the SNP would have lost even had we broken into Free Soil, Moderates, and Democrats?
And heh, there's no chance the Union Party would survive another whole election with the great differences between the more radical Whigs and the Democrats. Given a cooling situation in terms of the Union (and thus "more pressing" issues in the nitpicking that distinguishes them), I predict that party lines will start re-forming right about now.
What's the vote count on the Militia Bill? ))
Well, considering that the person in charge was King before, who was hardly a tyrant of Southern slavery, and the vote does not count for the Congressional runs (which are no doubt showing some support for the SNP among former Democrats in the south, although maybe not as much as predicted), I would hardly say that anyone is being "thrown out" (much less that all of them are tyrants, of course).
This country was based on the hard work and cooperation of many peoples. Let us commit again to refusing to discriminate with building codes or limited citizenships or other such unnecessary chains on our diverse people, coming into the land of liberty recently, or here for centuries before us.
((well, born 1815 would suggest an age of 26 - it might be interesting to see how a young party-less son of immigrants might be in the Senate))
((We're assuming, for the moment, that the Senator has been elected as an Independent. My character is 26, hence the birth date; what else would you like to know?))
((oh yeah, forgot about the candidates not being able to vote part. So yeah, a complete split would have been iffy (it would depend on whether one group dominated the field among the three - if not, then the SNP would have had victory). A two way split (splitting 10 votes between two parties) would be a guaranteed win, though, unless it changed the rhetoric of the election, pushing more to the SNP (but it would still need a substantial amount to tip the scales). Interesting, politics is a mysterious thing sometimes.))No Actually we would have won, you forget that candidates would have to be fielded for all of those splinter cells, meaning you would have to split 8 three ways, not 12. beyond this, I think some more democrats might have converted to SNP without the NU to back them up.
1) each senator must be at least 30 years old, 2) must have been a citizen of the United States for at least the past nine years, and 3) must be (at the time of the election) an inhabitant of the state he or she seeks to represent. Uh maybe you were born in 1805 not 1815?
((oh yeah, forgot about the candidates not being able to vote part. So yeah, a complete split would have been iffy (it would depend on whether one group dominated the field among the three - if not, then the SNP would have had victory). A two way split (splitting 10 votes between two parties) would be a guaranteed win, though, unless it changed the rhetoric of the election, pushing more to the SNP (but it would still need a substantial amount to tip the scales). Interesting, politics is a mysterious thing sometimes.))
Today is a glorius day for all Americans!
Not only has the North accepted the ticket of peace within the country but the majority of the South as well! A triumph for moderation above populism and attempts to create civil war!
I am thrilled that my fellow Americans have elected President Cameron and myself as Vice President. United our house shall stand!
Long Live the Republic!