-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
But it's true. Why should the devs change something when the person proposing the change doesn't provide any reason for it besides "I think it should be this way"? It is the responsibility of the person proposing the change to convince the devs something should be changed; the devs don't need to justify not changing something if it works just fine as is.
This.
He didn't give an argument. He just said X MUST BE Y - and we've had enough of that shit in the last Z years of the mod's existence. Give us a decent argument that is convincing or save your breath and feelings.
If I defeat UoB as Canada the decide to release the uk can I play as uk and will I get control over Canada?
You can play as UK after you defeat UoB. UK after its creation ( via event ) become leader of Entete.
Bug report: Kassel has a level 10 shipyard (inland province in Germany).
It made me laugh.
It made me laugh.
So I take it there is no way for me to annex cannada cause I cinda want the territories I conquered as them
Canada can be annexed, it depends on the situation. As UoB or CoF for example, the events are geared to simulate an invasion from the East coast that eventually pushes the Canadian forces West, past Winnipeg and then Vancouver. This leads to the Royalty fleeing to Australasian Confederation or Delhi, if they're still around that is.
As the CSA however I'm unsure how the events are handled.
Still, all three of the nations stated tend to release the Socialist Republic of Canada, with a small chance of Quebec being liberated.
No I mean I was playing as Canada annexed UoB and liberated uk by event hopping that I could annex Canada as the uk. I was opportunistic during the American civil war and conquered most of the US I want those as the uk.
I think I spoke about that idea a few months ago, I don't remember if it became an event or if it was dismissed. But I think this option should exist for the UK, not only about annexing Canada, but all Imperial states, Australasia, South Africa (If part of the Entente), Delhi, etc. (Of course all of them should be able to say no to that, which may lead to war between the UK and them!
Yeah I played from the point of view of a government in exile. canada has over 200 IC and i really want to have that plus the level 7 nuclear reactor they have and the navy seriously its huge, still i want to play as canada. I dont suppose i could edit my country to be uk?
You are misunderstanding what I am saying. I am not saying it's the devs duty to change stuff because a random person says so, I'm trying to say that by just outright ignoring ideas and saying the person who proposed it has no right to speech might make people less inclined to propose ideas.
I'm not defending his particular proposal, but I think it's better either to give a counterargument, say "We might consider it", ask for the person to explain his idea more or if you've "had enough of that shit" or just don't feel like talking about it one could say "We're not planning on adding that, sorry. End of discussion" not just "What you say doesn't matter!"
Implying other people should just shut up against the devs word is pretty silly in my opinion. Also, sorry if I went off-topic with this post. I don't mean any offence against you guys, I know you're doing a great job, but I was mildly irritated by the attitude in that post. Maybe I'm just trying to overly analyze things...
The Union of the Empire Event Chain perhaps? Where the Commonwealth realizes that with the Empire getting back on its feet, its time to centralize and effectivise. Leading to the military and industrial might being collaborated into one nation, the British Empire to check the German Empire.
Maybe a word with the mod author of the British Empire Revision Mod is in order?
Though I do remember this being brought up many a month ago on the KR forums, it kinda died out afaik.
Maybe a word with the mod author of the British Empire Revision Mod is in order?
Though I do remember this being brought up many a month ago on the KR forums, it kinda died out afaik.
I just played as nationalist Russia, and the Transamur decision never appeared for me, despite retaking the Transsiberian.
Also, not sure if a bug, but after choosing to create a new bloc with Japan ("Choosing Sides" chain), nothing at all happened - the alliance event for Japan didn't fire. I tried looking into the event files, but failed to see the problem.
And a minor issue - if Mongolia is puppeted by Russia by the time China gathers, it still behaves as independent Ungern Mongolia - DOW event fires, and Chinese get "Hanging Ungern" event upon conquering it.
Also, not sure if a bug, but after choosing to create a new bloc with Japan ("Choosing Sides" chain), nothing at all happened - the alliance event for Japan didn't fire. I tried looking into the event files, but failed to see the problem.
And a minor issue - if Mongolia is puppeted by Russia by the time China gathers, it still behaves as independent Ungern Mongolia - DOW event fires, and Chinese get "Hanging Ungern" event upon conquering it.
Is it possible to make an option on the event if Germany conquers the UoB to recreate the orginal UK and restore the original kingdom if Canada joins Mitteleuropa. Same option as of the partitioning France - you have 5 choices and one of them is to give back Nationalist France their continental claims if they join Mitteleuropa.
Well, coorta replied to Calad asking for reasons to convert the events into decisions. The fact that Calad then reasoned it would be awesome to disrespect the guy getting all the material for KR together doesn't really grant him any fucking right to a docile reply.
But he still got a docile reply. It was the post after I was referring to.
I said he lost his right to one, not that he per se should be badmouthed. Coorta admirably decided to explicitly tell him what Calad should have understood from his first post.
Yes, and that was very good. I repeat that I found the post after to be slightly unnecessary.