Doesn't it seems strange that Sengoku is coming out before CK2?
Doesn't it seems strange that Sengoku is coming out before CK2?
Why don't you just merge with Total War guys now...
Like I said in a previous post:
They are such different games that don't even compete with eachother.I don't see any relation between the total war series and paradoxian clauswitz games. They are completely different. Just because they're set in the same era, and fall under the "strategy" category, that doesn't mean one replaces the other. It's like comparing between pants and sweaters just because they fall under "clothes" category.




One does not put a king on trial. One kills him.
One cannot reign innocently: the insanity of doing so is evident. Every king is a rebel and a usurper.
Saint Just.
Look forward to this one...will buy.
A Knights of Honor story:
The Merchant of Alexandria: a Fatimids AAR
Le Schtroumpf qui schtroumpfe le schtroumpf est un gros Schtroumpf….c’est le Schtroumpf qui l’a schtroumpfé. Et si le Schtroumpf ne le schtroumpfe pas, c'est son propre schtroumpf. C'est quand même incroyable que l'on ne peut pas schtroumpfer ce que l'on veut schtroumpfer dans le schtroumpf sans être schtoumpfé de Schtroumpf.
"It is because people's minds are not logical and enlightened that the Empire is in disorder. If the country is not properly ruled there will be no end to rebellions. And if anyone wishes to get the knowledge of how to rule it properly he will only find it in books. That is why the publication of books is the beginning of beneficient rule."
- Tokugawa Ieyasu
Can someone confirm or deny from the developers if this is going to use the CK 2 character, political, and marriage engine?
Obviously there would be differences (bastard children were more acceptable in Japan and there was no Pope... well there was the Emperor), but overall there is a good deal of similarity between CK and the Sengoku era.
"Can't you rid us of our commander?" -Lammerding to Heinz Guderian
My first AAR - Frankfurt: A tale of an angry little German city that could (Magni Mundi IV)
My second AAR - Shetland: A World Conquest Crusader Kings - Deus Vult AAR
My first Let's Play video - Click here to view My Let's Play Dwarf Fortress 0.34.10 (tutorial) video
Technically, Toyotomi unified Japan, but could not get the Shogun title because of his low birth. Had Ieyasu not revolted against his son, the same thing could have happened starting with Toyotomi's line. The simple fact that the Shogun had formed did not mean that 300 years of peace would have lasted. Many of the vassals still retained their armies.
Also, is Korea and Manchu included? Toyotomi did invade Korea before he died.
"Can't you rid us of our commander?" -Lammerding to Heinz Guderian
My first AAR - Frankfurt: A tale of an angry little German city that could (Magni Mundi IV)
My second AAR - Shetland: A World Conquest Crusader Kings - Deus Vult AAR
My first Let's Play video - Click here to view My Let's Play Dwarf Fortress 0.34.10 (tutorial) video




One does not put a king on trial. One kills him.
One cannot reign innocently: the insanity of doing so is evident. Every king is a rebel and a usurper.
Saint Just.
Monumenta Iaponiae Historica : total improvement mod for Sengoku (ver.0.6832:updated on 23.11.2012)
Additional Scenarios (1180, 1561, 1582 and 1600), More Historical Characters and Rebalancing
General description about MIH for non registered forum users is here in Sengoku main forum
Eurus (an improvement mod of Asian regions from Japan to India) for EU3: DW (ver.1.4: updated on 29.09.2012)
Three Mods for CK2:Climate Classification/Trade Spheres (the former Hanseatic League)/Bookmarks
Sweden in a Japanese game: AAR of Koei's Genghis Khan IV
Nice choice of Hoi2 music. I always did love that song.![]()
Looks like not. But the focus of the game is in unifying Japan, not in going conquest spree after it. Korea would also require China. Not only did it participate in the war on Korean side, but conquering China was Hideyoshis ultimate objective. Adding all that would be quite a lot of extra work.
"It is because people's minds are not logical and enlightened that the Empire is in disorder. If the country is not properly ruled there will be no end to rebellions. And if anyone wishes to get the knowledge of how to rule it properly he will only find it in books. That is why the publication of books is the beginning of beneficient rule."
- Tokugawa Ieyasu
"I don't want to know or hear anything about neutrality. This is a fight between God and the devil. If he wants to side with God, then he has to join me. If he prefers to side with the devil, then indeed he must fight me. There is no third way."
Senior Scripter
~ Ivan Turina ~
The game looks like it might be interesting but couldn't it have been given a more memorable name, or at least a relevant English sub-title like Shogun has?
I don't know much about far-eastern history so when I saw the title of the e-mail "Paradox Interactive Announce Sengoku" I assumed it was going to be a puzzle game, an impression further reinforced by the plain logo at the top of the e-mail. It wasn't until I got to the bit that said 'grand strategy' and especially 'internally developed' that I started to take an interest and actually looked up what the name referred to.
Sengoku looks like a very interesting game but I cannot help but think that this is another game similar to EU-Rome, with a smallish map and much the same flavor overall. Thoughts?
Well, I like Rome, especially with the VV addon.
But it looks more like it will be a game similar to CKII. If they make it complex enough, it has great pontential. Imagine yourself starting as a vassal, uniting a clan and conqer japan on a hard long road.
I will definitely buy it. Like every handmade paradox game![]()
Divide et Impera
Proud Paradoxian... Vicky+Rev, VictoriaII+AHD+HOD, Hoi, Hoi2+DD+Arma, HoiIII+SeFi+FTM+TFH, EUIII+IN+NA+HTTT+DW, Rome+VV, CK+DV, Sengoku, CKII+SOI+LOR+TR, MotE ...since 2004
I liked EU:Rome, but I think it's problem is that there wasn't the same level of character interaction as would be from a CK style game, which Sengoku apparently is supposed to be.
The Sengoku period is all about uniting the kokujins of a koku, and use that force to conquer nearby provinces. Most sengoku daimyos functioned as mere leader of a coalition of minor lords from a province, and their realms collapsed when the minor lords abandoned them (doesn't help that most sengoku daimyos started as deputies of the true owner of each koku). If this is modelled, it would be similar to CK in how you need to appease and maintain the support of your vassals, which I think have a lot of potential.
Well, the sensible end date would be Genna Enbu in 1615, which marked the end large scale warfare for a couple of hundred years. Otherwise, there's the Battle of Sekigahara in 1600, which heralded the start of the Edo Period, but which would leave the Toyotomi as unfinished business. The worst case scenario would be IMHO an end date at the destruction of the Ashikaga Shogunate in 1573, which marked the start of the Azuchi-Momoyama Period, but Japan was highly fragmented then, and the most famous sengoku daimyos were still active.
Last edited by rmdsc; 03-03-2011 at 03:09.
It's not that there aren't enough hours in the day. Just that I'm not awake for enough of the ones already available. - Karen Ellis