10. BAGHDAD NOVEMBER
Waddeneilanden, north of the Dutch mainland, was captured at the start of the month, something I did not expect. I had written off Rommel's attention to Waddeneilanden as worthless, and made special note of the fact that on manual control, I would plug up Waddeneilanden (only one province need defend against it) and bypass. But results materialized nonetheless, leading to another (albeit heavily penalized for amphibious connection) angle of attack on the western Netherlands. The same day, the U-boats recorded a three-merchant-fleet victory over the British in the Channel.
On the 3rd, submarine anti-air and engine projects completed, making acoustic torpedo research available. Checking flotilla production, I discovered that state-of-the-art subs using these new techs are classifiable as Type XXIs. Type XXIs have a mystique out of proportion to their historical impact; more than a hundred were ordered but their modular mass production was sloppy and only four seaworthy XXIs could be assembled from components by the end of the war. Production is started on eight flotillas of XXIs, for a total of forty boats. I will have ten times the XXIs the real fleet did, and they'll be at least three years early.
No Schnorkel? What kind of bullshit Type XXI is this? Maybe it's abstracted into the hull, which in HoI3 is primarily a rating of dive depth by way of Visibility. Being able to "surface" below the surface certainly reduces visibility.
On the 10th, a Ports Guard unit shatters in Ede, adding to its reputation as the war's toughest battlefield. The Ports Guard is the remnant of my aborted plan to give port garrison responsibility directly to the naval arm. I abandoned this idea and transferred the units involved to Rommel's command, but didn't change the name. Also on the 10th, the Italians capture Cairo. On the 14th, they capture Alexandria and advance on the Suez Canal, which unfortunately does not seem to grant a strategic effect.
On the 17th, the new Type IX flotillas are deemed ready for service, having spent two and a half weeks in shakedown and final testing. UG Kurt Weill (under Ciliax) and five new UGs are deployed, expanding the Brunhilde Belt right up the the entire British coast, as we no longer fear their ASW. Audaciously, Raeder's Deutschland Task Force is deployed to patrol off the Dutch coast and bombard in support of the Waddeneilanden advance.
On the 19th, Raeder is engaged by British naval commander Dunbar-Naismith with a small fleet featuring the Royal Oak and the King George V. The Deutschland and the Admiral Scheer are damaged and the Admiral Scheer is knocked out. Although the enemy heavy cruiser Durban and two enemy destroyer flotillas are significantly damaged, I order Raeder to break off and return to Rostock, concerned about the DTF's light cruisers up against the generally operational British battleships. The DTF loses a flotilla of destroyers in the disengagement. Repairs to the DTF are expected to take months and I don't see how it can be effective without even further crippling of the British, or the addition of closely coordinated naval bomber support or heavy surface ships (perhaps licensed designs from the Italians?). I doubt submarines could have helped. However, the bright side is that while the British retain surface capability, their ASW is no more effective for it. Postcombat analysis suggests that the bombardment did not help in Waddeneilanden (i.e., I waited, the battle resolved, and it was a loss, and enemy casualties were nothing special).
Rumors that ship silhouettes against city lights were easier targets for U-boats led some American coastal municipalities to enforce blackouts at night. Do you think the British will do that? Board up your windows, Portsmouth!
On the 20th, German-assisted Hungarians on the Italian front captured Nice as part of the slow general advance in the south. Knocking the French off the Mediterranean would make their convoy operations much less slippery; I suspect a great deal of their cargo sails through slipshod Italian submarine zones rather than my own seething deathtrap cauldrons of torpedo salvos. UG Hans Pfitzner was redeployed with its replacement boats as a mixed Type IIB/IX group, having missed the excitement and shame of the Raeder mess in its operational zone by a day.
On the 23rd, we got a radar advance and a fighter ground control advance. Radar research was shelved for the time being (we're way ahead of schedule) in favor of the secret acoustic torpedo project, which is even more ahead of schedule but also even more cooler. The Persians take Baghdad only to lose it later; the whole front over there is chaotic and sparse on both sides. There are only three VP provinces in Iraq and it wouldn't be hard to take all of them if they'd just get their shit together. I'm pretty damn sure a single corps from the units I have fighting Belgium could do it in a week if they started from the Persian border.
The Italians have re-secured Albania and WO III advances continue. Things must be tense in Casablanca and conflicted in (Nationalist Spanish) Tangiers. Still no sign of the British around Karachi. (When I played Persia in Victoria 2, as linked in my sig, Karachi was my first conquest. This Persia is a hundred years less on the ball.)
On the 30th, we get a sonar and detection advance. If I'd looked more carefully at the tech list, I would have started that XXI project now instead of back on the 3rd. Oh well. Finland and Denmark are drifting Allied at the moment, but they're stranded in the middle ground and not immediate conversion risks. Hopefully I will be able to bring Sweden and Norway in to deter flips before it becomes an issue. I'm guessing at least another year before I can invite any Scandinavian countries to the Axis.
On hydrophones, a merchant engine has a mumbling sound, and a warship's engine noise is more of a chuckle or clatter, but a torpedo engine is a high droning hum. Acoustic torpedo engines have to be quieter than usual, for obvious reasons.
Meet the new U-groups! These are all deployed out of Rostock, and mostly operating in coastal Home Waters.
UG Brunk Frank, commanded by Förste
Would they really name a U-group after Bruno Frank? Presumably the laws of the Reich specifically disallowed this sort of honor from being bestowed on someone who worked, as Frank did, on the movie of The Hunchback of Notre Dame, a story with no particular appeal to Nazis. Also, Frank was friends with a circle of consciously anti-Nazi authors who fled the country, including Thomas Mann.
UG Franz Marc, commanded by Lütjens
Would they really name a U-group after Franz Marc? He died in WWI, and his passions were for painting, not politics, so you'd think he'd be safe. But just when you think it's safe to go in the water, Nazis hate you. Turns out they officially disapproved of his art even though he was dead already, and featured him in the "degenerate art" exhibition of officially condemned works. The government of the time figured out too late that Marc wasn't supposed to be deployed on the front lines because he was a national treasure as an artist, but before they could recall him, he was killed by shrapnel. If not for that, he would have survived to the 1930s, and then fled to Switzerland, and then to America, and then etc.
UG Max Brod, commanded by Schuster
Would they really name a U-group after Max Brod? If Franz Kafka had posthumous veto power over U-group names, he might exercise it based on Brod's decision to publish Kafka's books after Kafka's death even though Kafka had told him to burn them. He fled Austria for British Palestine; I will ask the Persians to say hello if they ever get there.
UG Ernst Bloch, commanded by Zieger
Would they really name a U-group after Ernst Bloch? There were two Ernst Blochs and it's no for both of them. One was a Swiss-American composer and the other a Marxist philosopher who fled wartime Germany for a variety of countries ending in the USA but resettled in East Germany after the war.
UG Emil Ludwig, commanded by Mewis
Would they really name a U-group after Emil Ludwig? I suspect otherwise. Goebbels wrote in his diary that he considered Ludwig's writing particularly dangerous, and Ludwig went to Switzerland and then the United States. What were these dangerous writings? They were popular biographies of Napoleon, Bismarck, the Kaiser, etc. If Goebbels could have found a little notebook pre-printed on every page with "I hate art! I hate music! I hate literature!," his diary-writing time could have been streamlined considerably.
Sinkings for November:
Greece: five merchants. Welcome, newcomers.
Belgium: seven merchants. Welcome back, intermittent regulars.
France: 20 merchants.
Netherlands: 53 merchants. DIE ALREADY
Britain: 137 merchants. What's the matter, running low?
TOTAL: 222 merchants and no escorts. Estimated 11.1 million tons of merchant shipping.
Nuarq, you raise some excellent questions. The most foolproof way to know the British convoy situation would be to load up as Britain and check, but I feel like that would be too cheaty. The historical German Navy didn't have perfect information. In fact, they thought a red spotlight reported on a British destroyer was an infrared rangefinding beam until somebody kindly told them that you can't actually see infrared. For a long time they underestimated radar and codebreaking (with the aforementioned red spotlight distracting them from one of their many chances to deduce the capabilities of Allied ship radar), and they paid dearly for it. On the other hand it's frustrating that the stuff I care most about finding out, particularly convoy reserves and convoy routes, doesn't bother to show up in the spy information. But the other hand can go jerk it. I won't load up other countries to look at their bits, and if I did, I would load up the United States and see what exactly they are doing over there that isn't the war.
However! I can estimate British or anyone else's convoy capabilities. I may be a little off depending on how practical and techs factor in, but here goes. Merchant transports cost 2 IC for 100 days, and escorts cost 4 IC for 240 days. Right away, the production delay tells us two things. The war and the convoy losses started in May, so convoy replacements wouldn't have hit the water until early September at the soonest. Similarly, even the swiftest wartime escort production order won't christen its boats until year's end, explaining all the unescorted convoys lately.
As for the cost and opportunity cost of this stuff, it's worth noting first off that escorts and submarines have about the same production requirements. Harsh. Real merchants and escorts could be requisitioned and retrofitted and basically there were fast ways to get them together. They're also not warships in the conventional sense (or at all in the case of merchants) and they don't need big guns or specialized electronics or heavy armor plating. Hell, the main ASW weapon of the convoy escort is just a track on the deck for rolling depth charges over the side. Submarines, on the other hand, require pressure hulls and dual engine systems and banks of batteries and all kinds of nutty shit. I suspect it ought to be considerably easier to slap a towed sonar array on a Coast Guard cutter and call it a day.
My spies, and I have 10 spies in the UK so this should be reliable, tell me the British have an effective IC of 258. (They also say British resource reserves are sky-high, sadly, meaning they may not run out in a meaningful amount of time despite the blockade.) If the British built nothing but merchant flotillas right from the start of the war, they could dump out 129 in September and another 129 sometime around December. If they built nothing but escorts, they could produce almost 65 by year's end. Belgium has 46 IC, the Dutch have 48, and the French have 168. I don't know what the Greeks have because they're not important enough to spy on right now. The USA has over 500 IC, but let's assume they're not an immediate problem. (For comparison, Germany has around 300 and the Soviets have somewhere in the mid-200s.) Adding together the known ICs of the countries that have been losing merchants, we get 520 IC. From this I derive a maximum replacement rate of 260 merchants per 3 months and 10 days (we sink about that many in a single month) or 130 escorts per 8 months (100 escorts have been destroyed in 4 or 5 months with no appreciable losses other than the von Nordeck disaster).
I'd say we are exceeding the rate of replacement. Plus or minus Greece. Double those rates for a thumbnail sketch of American potential should they appear in force as convoy operators. The U-boats still win on paper, with the real outcome depending on how tough the escorts are and what kind of air/sea ASW support is provided. (It seems like the game might consider escort engagement necessary before task forces and air wings can effectively assist.) Once again, hooray for neutral Iceland and Greenland denying them the usual mid-Atlantic bases, as this cuts air cover in particular very sharply.
Ugly thought for the day: U-boats won't help me much against the Soviets when the time comes.
Waddeneilanden, north of the Dutch mainland, was captured at the start of the month, something I did not expect. I had written off Rommel's attention to Waddeneilanden as worthless, and made special note of the fact that on manual control, I would plug up Waddeneilanden (only one province need defend against it) and bypass. But results materialized nonetheless, leading to another (albeit heavily penalized for amphibious connection) angle of attack on the western Netherlands. The same day, the U-boats recorded a three-merchant-fleet victory over the British in the Channel.
On the 3rd, submarine anti-air and engine projects completed, making acoustic torpedo research available. Checking flotilla production, I discovered that state-of-the-art subs using these new techs are classifiable as Type XXIs. Type XXIs have a mystique out of proportion to their historical impact; more than a hundred were ordered but their modular mass production was sloppy and only four seaworthy XXIs could be assembled from components by the end of the war. Production is started on eight flotillas of XXIs, for a total of forty boats. I will have ten times the XXIs the real fleet did, and they'll be at least three years early.
No Schnorkel? What kind of bullshit Type XXI is this? Maybe it's abstracted into the hull, which in HoI3 is primarily a rating of dive depth by way of Visibility. Being able to "surface" below the surface certainly reduces visibility.
On the 10th, a Ports Guard unit shatters in Ede, adding to its reputation as the war's toughest battlefield. The Ports Guard is the remnant of my aborted plan to give port garrison responsibility directly to the naval arm. I abandoned this idea and transferred the units involved to Rommel's command, but didn't change the name. Also on the 10th, the Italians capture Cairo. On the 14th, they capture Alexandria and advance on the Suez Canal, which unfortunately does not seem to grant a strategic effect.
On the 17th, the new Type IX flotillas are deemed ready for service, having spent two and a half weeks in shakedown and final testing. UG Kurt Weill (under Ciliax) and five new UGs are deployed, expanding the Brunhilde Belt right up the the entire British coast, as we no longer fear their ASW. Audaciously, Raeder's Deutschland Task Force is deployed to patrol off the Dutch coast and bombard in support of the Waddeneilanden advance.
On the 19th, Raeder is engaged by British naval commander Dunbar-Naismith with a small fleet featuring the Royal Oak and the King George V. The Deutschland and the Admiral Scheer are damaged and the Admiral Scheer is knocked out. Although the enemy heavy cruiser Durban and two enemy destroyer flotillas are significantly damaged, I order Raeder to break off and return to Rostock, concerned about the DTF's light cruisers up against the generally operational British battleships. The DTF loses a flotilla of destroyers in the disengagement. Repairs to the DTF are expected to take months and I don't see how it can be effective without even further crippling of the British, or the addition of closely coordinated naval bomber support or heavy surface ships (perhaps licensed designs from the Italians?). I doubt submarines could have helped. However, the bright side is that while the British retain surface capability, their ASW is no more effective for it. Postcombat analysis suggests that the bombardment did not help in Waddeneilanden (i.e., I waited, the battle resolved, and it was a loss, and enemy casualties were nothing special).
Rumors that ship silhouettes against city lights were easier targets for U-boats led some American coastal municipalities to enforce blackouts at night. Do you think the British will do that? Board up your windows, Portsmouth!
On the 20th, German-assisted Hungarians on the Italian front captured Nice as part of the slow general advance in the south. Knocking the French off the Mediterranean would make their convoy operations much less slippery; I suspect a great deal of their cargo sails through slipshod Italian submarine zones rather than my own seething deathtrap cauldrons of torpedo salvos. UG Hans Pfitzner was redeployed with its replacement boats as a mixed Type IIB/IX group, having missed the excitement and shame of the Raeder mess in its operational zone by a day.
On the 23rd, we got a radar advance and a fighter ground control advance. Radar research was shelved for the time being (we're way ahead of schedule) in favor of the secret acoustic torpedo project, which is even more ahead of schedule but also even more cooler. The Persians take Baghdad only to lose it later; the whole front over there is chaotic and sparse on both sides. There are only three VP provinces in Iraq and it wouldn't be hard to take all of them if they'd just get their shit together. I'm pretty damn sure a single corps from the units I have fighting Belgium could do it in a week if they started from the Persian border.
The Italians have re-secured Albania and WO III advances continue. Things must be tense in Casablanca and conflicted in (Nationalist Spanish) Tangiers. Still no sign of the British around Karachi. (When I played Persia in Victoria 2, as linked in my sig, Karachi was my first conquest. This Persia is a hundred years less on the ball.)
On the 30th, we get a sonar and detection advance. If I'd looked more carefully at the tech list, I would have started that XXI project now instead of back on the 3rd. Oh well. Finland and Denmark are drifting Allied at the moment, but they're stranded in the middle ground and not immediate conversion risks. Hopefully I will be able to bring Sweden and Norway in to deter flips before it becomes an issue. I'm guessing at least another year before I can invite any Scandinavian countries to the Axis.
On hydrophones, a merchant engine has a mumbling sound, and a warship's engine noise is more of a chuckle or clatter, but a torpedo engine is a high droning hum. Acoustic torpedo engines have to be quieter than usual, for obvious reasons.
Meet the new U-groups! These are all deployed out of Rostock, and mostly operating in coastal Home Waters.
UG Brunk Frank, commanded by Förste
Would they really name a U-group after Bruno Frank? Presumably the laws of the Reich specifically disallowed this sort of honor from being bestowed on someone who worked, as Frank did, on the movie of The Hunchback of Notre Dame, a story with no particular appeal to Nazis. Also, Frank was friends with a circle of consciously anti-Nazi authors who fled the country, including Thomas Mann.
UG Franz Marc, commanded by Lütjens
Would they really name a U-group after Franz Marc? He died in WWI, and his passions were for painting, not politics, so you'd think he'd be safe. But just when you think it's safe to go in the water, Nazis hate you. Turns out they officially disapproved of his art even though he was dead already, and featured him in the "degenerate art" exhibition of officially condemned works. The government of the time figured out too late that Marc wasn't supposed to be deployed on the front lines because he was a national treasure as an artist, but before they could recall him, he was killed by shrapnel. If not for that, he would have survived to the 1930s, and then fled to Switzerland, and then to America, and then etc.
UG Max Brod, commanded by Schuster
Would they really name a U-group after Max Brod? If Franz Kafka had posthumous veto power over U-group names, he might exercise it based on Brod's decision to publish Kafka's books after Kafka's death even though Kafka had told him to burn them. He fled Austria for British Palestine; I will ask the Persians to say hello if they ever get there.
UG Ernst Bloch, commanded by Zieger
Would they really name a U-group after Ernst Bloch? There were two Ernst Blochs and it's no for both of them. One was a Swiss-American composer and the other a Marxist philosopher who fled wartime Germany for a variety of countries ending in the USA but resettled in East Germany after the war.
UG Emil Ludwig, commanded by Mewis
Would they really name a U-group after Emil Ludwig? I suspect otherwise. Goebbels wrote in his diary that he considered Ludwig's writing particularly dangerous, and Ludwig went to Switzerland and then the United States. What were these dangerous writings? They were popular biographies of Napoleon, Bismarck, the Kaiser, etc. If Goebbels could have found a little notebook pre-printed on every page with "I hate art! I hate music! I hate literature!," his diary-writing time could have been streamlined considerably.
Sinkings for November:
Greece: five merchants. Welcome, newcomers.
Belgium: seven merchants. Welcome back, intermittent regulars.
France: 20 merchants.
Netherlands: 53 merchants. DIE ALREADY
Britain: 137 merchants. What's the matter, running low?
TOTAL: 222 merchants and no escorts. Estimated 11.1 million tons of merchant shipping.
Nuarq, you raise some excellent questions. The most foolproof way to know the British convoy situation would be to load up as Britain and check, but I feel like that would be too cheaty. The historical German Navy didn't have perfect information. In fact, they thought a red spotlight reported on a British destroyer was an infrared rangefinding beam until somebody kindly told them that you can't actually see infrared. For a long time they underestimated radar and codebreaking (with the aforementioned red spotlight distracting them from one of their many chances to deduce the capabilities of Allied ship radar), and they paid dearly for it. On the other hand it's frustrating that the stuff I care most about finding out, particularly convoy reserves and convoy routes, doesn't bother to show up in the spy information. But the other hand can go jerk it. I won't load up other countries to look at their bits, and if I did, I would load up the United States and see what exactly they are doing over there that isn't the war.
However! I can estimate British or anyone else's convoy capabilities. I may be a little off depending on how practical and techs factor in, but here goes. Merchant transports cost 2 IC for 100 days, and escorts cost 4 IC for 240 days. Right away, the production delay tells us two things. The war and the convoy losses started in May, so convoy replacements wouldn't have hit the water until early September at the soonest. Similarly, even the swiftest wartime escort production order won't christen its boats until year's end, explaining all the unescorted convoys lately.
As for the cost and opportunity cost of this stuff, it's worth noting first off that escorts and submarines have about the same production requirements. Harsh. Real merchants and escorts could be requisitioned and retrofitted and basically there were fast ways to get them together. They're also not warships in the conventional sense (or at all in the case of merchants) and they don't need big guns or specialized electronics or heavy armor plating. Hell, the main ASW weapon of the convoy escort is just a track on the deck for rolling depth charges over the side. Submarines, on the other hand, require pressure hulls and dual engine systems and banks of batteries and all kinds of nutty shit. I suspect it ought to be considerably easier to slap a towed sonar array on a Coast Guard cutter and call it a day.
My spies, and I have 10 spies in the UK so this should be reliable, tell me the British have an effective IC of 258. (They also say British resource reserves are sky-high, sadly, meaning they may not run out in a meaningful amount of time despite the blockade.) If the British built nothing but merchant flotillas right from the start of the war, they could dump out 129 in September and another 129 sometime around December. If they built nothing but escorts, they could produce almost 65 by year's end. Belgium has 46 IC, the Dutch have 48, and the French have 168. I don't know what the Greeks have because they're not important enough to spy on right now. The USA has over 500 IC, but let's assume they're not an immediate problem. (For comparison, Germany has around 300 and the Soviets have somewhere in the mid-200s.) Adding together the known ICs of the countries that have been losing merchants, we get 520 IC. From this I derive a maximum replacement rate of 260 merchants per 3 months and 10 days (we sink about that many in a single month) or 130 escorts per 8 months (100 escorts have been destroyed in 4 or 5 months with no appreciable losses other than the von Nordeck disaster).
I'd say we are exceeding the rate of replacement. Plus or minus Greece. Double those rates for a thumbnail sketch of American potential should they appear in force as convoy operators. The U-boats still win on paper, with the real outcome depending on how tough the escorts are and what kind of air/sea ASW support is provided. (It seems like the game might consider escort engagement necessary before task forces and air wings can effectively assist.) Once again, hooray for neutral Iceland and Greenland denying them the usual mid-Atlantic bases, as this cuts air cover in particular very sharply.
Ugly thought for the day: U-boats won't help me much against the Soviets when the time comes.