Raaage!

**King_Richard_XI** · 10-02-2011 15:06

I love the way my Trollemia has caught on in so many threads. It's brilliant.

**HanSime** · 10-02-2011 16:34

Originally Posted by King_Richard_XI

I love the way my Trollemia has caught on in so many threads. It's brilliant.

But it's the flag that made it personal.

**GregElSho** · 10-02-2011 21:12

Okay, here I bring my contribution.
But it's not a "normal" one, as I quite never rage, since I play in easy difficulty like a n00bz0r (I'm probably too french for the AI to handle, anyway).

Instead I though it could be fun to explore "historical rages", for the instruction and lulz of everyone.

So here's lesson one, that I shall call: "It ain't easy bein' a minor ally in big wars, bro"

**vanin** · 10-02-2011 21:17

Those Savoyards still managed to unify Italy quite well though.

Another such historical rage would be 18th century Poland for sure, being piled on by everyone close by and their grandmother.

**RSavage** · 10-02-2011 21:18

I wish i knew enough history to understand that

**GregElSho** · 10-02-2011 21:29

Originally Posted by vanin

Those Savoyards still managed to unify Italy quite well though.

Sure thing. Still, Vittorio Amadeo's been raging for a while before that.

Another such historical rage would be 18th century Poland for sure, being piled on by everyone close by and their grandmother.

Well, I'm not in for making all the lessons, so you're welcome to give it a go.

(And RSavage, I'm not much of an history buff myself, but you don't need to know history to get it, I just told you how history went!

)

**esk1m0** · 10-02-2011 22:46

Napoleon + Russia + winter?

**Marconius** · 10-02-2011 23:10

By "Habsburg succession war", do you mean the War of Spanish Succession? I must admit, my 15-17th century history knowledge is lacking... ^^;

**GregElSho** · 10-02-2011 23:32

I meant whatever the wiki meant by "Habsburg succession war".

(Mine's lacking too, and now everybody knows it! )

**Stratagyfan101** · 10-02-2011 23:47

Convenient how OPMS near me never have heirless rulers yet this can happen...

**herrhals** · 11-02-2011 00:29

what can happen?

**Darth-BobCat** · 11-02-2011 04:43

I think all of the countries listed in Green text are in a union under a single enemy?

**Timbrizcha** · 11-02-2011 07:13

if it's the list with "countries that lacks a heir with a decent claim", then I think the green ones are the ones you do have a royal marriage with.

**LordLeto** · 11-02-2011 07:18

That makes sense now, he can't possibly win a war to impose a PU on any of those guys and the ones he can pump out heirs like its going out of style.

**Beansontoast** · 11-02-2011 14:55

**DanubianCossak** · 11-02-2011 15:09

Your prestige must be higher than theirs

**Marconius** · 11-02-2011 17:29

Or... next month you just declare war and force that PU on them... You'd lose the claim to their throne if they got a heir anyway.

**HanSime** · 11-02-2011 18:26

Originally Posted by Marconius

Or... next month you just declare war and force that PU on them... You'd lose the claim to their throne if they got a heir anyway.

It's a bit too lame and gamey to do that all the time.

It is really frustrating though that I've been meaning to inherit France for a decade or 6 now and it keeps changing to the PU continues - even if it says inherit at the moment of ruler death.

**L Lawliet** · 11-02-2011 18:43

It's been a while, time to rage anew. Can't shoot 'em, can't outrun 'em, can't even taunt them to death. Over 9000 hours in paint. Hope you don't strain your eyes.

**kartebi** · 11-02-2011 19:36

Pisspants Surrenderton

ahhaahhhhhh good one

Thread: Raaage!

Thread Tools

Okay...

Posting Permissions