Prussia must be getting a bit nervous with you, Russia and Denmark on all three sides of them. If you teamed up they wouldn't stand a chance.Originally Posted by CanOmer
Continue of our DAO Lite 1.0 Multi; the year is 1510
Prussia must be getting a bit nervous with you, Russia and Denmark on all three sides of them. If you teamed up they wouldn't stand a chance.Continue of our DAO Lite 1.0 Multi; the year is 1510
Except I don't think that Denmark wants Russia or the Ottomans to get any of their territory, because then it'll just be them, in between two slightly larger gigantic powers way stronger than them.
Denmark, Prussa and Russia are my forced allies. France is not hostile to me but GB always tries to create coalition against me. With his superior navy, I can't attack him.
Why exactly arent you permablockaded anyway? I kinda doubt anyone could do anything about GB, and eventually GB would have enough money to just pay off the other players to backstab you....
GB has merchants in everywhere, he is the only colonizer and needs lots of money. So he focused on colonizing of all America. I fought with GB, he blockaded my ports and occupied my islands but when I forced Russia, Denmark and Prussia into my alliance GB wanted peace.
Still strange, seems like none of this nations could hurt him and a blockade gives ungodly amounts of money if done right. There was a game where the player ended up with over 100k ducats to spare after 2 sessions of blockade of europe.
I think france is just waiting to take lands from the infidel.
Why exactly aren't France, Prussia, Russia, and Denmark more interested in attacking you? How did you force them to ally you?
-Ruanek
After the guy who rules France left us, France stayed in AI for few years when I threaten Prussia, Russia, and Denmark. Now we found a new player for France.
If they teamed up, would Prussia, Denmark, and Russia be able to beat you? What about with England's help? If so, why do they let you intimidate them?
-Ruanek
2 options:
-The other players are stupid
-The OE is too powerful
My EU3 Hansa Multiplayer AAR, probably the first in its kind, come and learn how an MP game is played!
Nicely done there,sir. That is awesome!As tiny landlocked Aachen, I was annoyed that I kept getting the mission to conquer Judea. I had no way to get there, and besides, the powerful Ottomans were allied with the owners (the Mamluks) anyway. But I got the mission one too many times, and so decided to actually do it. I got military access from a billion countries, all the way from Aachen to the Ottomans. That left the Timiruds with two provinces in between me and the Mamluks- Mus and Aleppo. I sponsored a whole bunch of rebels in Aleppo, and the Ottomans thankfully took control of Mus. I got my relations with the Ottomans all the way up to 200 so that they hopefully would break their alliance with the Mamluks. The rebels in Aleppo took it, and Aleppo was then taken over by the Mamluks. I upped my army to twice my force limit, marched eighteen thousand men over two thousand miles from Aachen to Mus, and declared war.
*snip*
Now relocate your capital!
Happy thoughts, happy thoughts...
OH GOD! RUN!
How can Russia tolerate you blocking their access to the black sea?Continue of our DAO Lite 1.0 Multi; the year is 1510
Other players are not stupid, a guy who is England better player than me. Denmark and Russia are also very experienced eu3 players. Ottomans has good units in early stages of game.
You must get to India before England does!
I should go.
Judging OE's army placements, I don't think they doHow can Russia tolerate you blocking their access to the black sea?
This. If there would be poland player, you could have hard time, trying to conquer that terrain (If polish player would be allied to russia). IMHO, while it is paradox, polish player should be allied to russian player, just to contain OE. And to prevent a big backstab(IE polish player sell russia all it cores(Which are wrong culture anyway), and russia don't take anything more - but give help to poland and focus its conquest in asia(to prevent all others from doing it)). Polish player, then should go PU bohemia and hungary(you certainly never want bohemia to be part of austria, and it is slavic culture group - and hungary should stay polish).
But OE early if not get stomped by few big players, shouldn't need much allies (If austria threaten it - it should antagonize it with it neighbours).
Yeah, any player in that area (Poland, Austria, etc.) would make things substantially harder for the Ottomans. If I remember correctly they did at one point have a Bavaria (I don't know why they didn't pick Austria) but that player became inactive.
-Ruanek
-Epic Scandinavia
-(not) Epic France
-Epic Poland , still in PU with Lithuania xD
-Sardinia-Piedmont formed
-Yes , Aztec, Maya, Inca, Catholic and Westernized
-Yes, Maya inherited Portugal
My humble Prussia, Bulwark against the Eastern Hordes and Other Mean People.
Lüneburg is in a PU, except for that there isn't a lot to note. I suffered from overextension for a long time because of the long-lived king Albrecht Dimwit I von Crapfenburg (a smashing 3/3/5). I intend to inherit my way into the north German area to see if I can form Germany.
For it is the iniquity of man which compels him to these tenebrous gates, seeking opiate dreams and the alluring embrace of oblivion...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
