• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Status
Not open for further replies.
No bourgeois constitutions! We need nothing more than a social contract! Though I see no problem in having that commited to writing.

What i mean is having our system of government formally written down and the rights of our citizens and all people defined for all to see.
 
I was right, Right I tells ya! The Anarchists in power will wreck the nation! *maniacal laughter*

Necazian: You should just form your own party, there's no way you could leave that ;)

Seek: We were both German Socialists back when I wrote that, remember?
 
What about establishing a new anarchist party, without any Russians?
A party that aims to guarantee freedoms, low taxes and tariffs, free trade, less state-capitalism, equal rights for everyone etc...?
Like a proper honest democratic party, without Russians and other immigrants?
Even better if they manage to keep some promises. And kill the bad guys in name of revolution.
 
What about establishing a new anarchist party, without any Russians?
A party that aims to guarantee freedoms, low taxes and tariffs, free trade, less state-capitalism, equal rights for everyone etc...?
Like a proper honest democratic party, without Russians and other immigrants?
Even better if they manage to keep some promises. And kill the bad guys in name of revolution.

You mean the German Anarchists? Don't you think it's a little hypocritical to campaign for equal rights while excluding immigrants from your party.
 
You mean the German Anarchists? Don't you think it's a little hypocritical to campaign for equal rights while excluding immigrants from your party.

Deutsche Anarchistische Partei?

Guys, can we try to have a party without Russians?
And French? Without something like Blanqui and Lenin?
Think of it.
Then, if things go wrong, we could just blame ourselves, not the immigrants?
 
I was right, Right I tells ya! The Anarchists in power will wreck the nation! *maniacal laughter*

I bit unfair really, when they were tethered by a pointless coallition, a minority government and a hesitant leader. As far as I'm concerned this was not an anarchist government.
 
I bit unfair really, when they were tethered by a pointless coallition, a minority government and a hesitant leader. As far as I'm concerned this was not an anarchist government.
Thank God, that's why things turned out as well as they did! If we gave Kropotkin (spl?) free reign things would be even worse!

And personally, the closest thing the anarchists have ever had to a competent leader is Kadon (by which I mean he was never leader, not incompetent).
 
Deutsche Anarchistische Partei?

Guys, can we try to have a party without Russians?
And French? Without something like Blanqui and Lenin?
Think of it.
Then, if things go wrong, we could just blame ourselves, not the immigrants?

All anarchists leaders were and are immigrants, most Russian and French. Aside of that, your racism is simply reactionary.
 
All anarchists leaders were and are immigrants, most Russian and French. Aside of that, your racism is simply reactionary.

Why do we harvest the greatest minds of humankind?
What right do we have to keep Kropotkin or Lenin?
Russia too needs heroes too to spread the gospel of revolution!
 
Seek: We were both German Socialists back when I wrote that, remember?

Yes, but you WERE after all more left than I was (jumping ship to the Marxists afterwards, I believe), and it still doesn't change the fact that you were the first to start bashing another faction, as well as to issue a death threat.
 
Yes, but you WERE after all more left than I was (jumping ship to the Marxists afterwards, I believe), and it still doesn't change the fact that you were the first to start bashing another faction, as well as to issue a death threat.

We should not ask who cried first for blood, but rather, who shall stand supreme in the end. Marxism is like a road, you use it until you reach the end. And in the end we have anarchy. And that is why call it the end. So that we can have a new beginning.
 
Yes, but you WERE after all more left than I was (jumping ship to the Marxists afterwards, I believe), and it still doesn't change the fact that you were the first to start bashing another faction, as well as to issue a death threat.

I only did that because they were the only party who supported intergrating Wallonia into the VSVR, I would say i'm more left than you were though, after all you were a supporter of the Militarists long before that party was even established. Funny how things change?
 
I only did that because they were the only party who supported intergrating Wallonia into the VSVR, I would say i'm more left than you were though, after all you were a supporter of the Militarists long before that party was even established. Funny how things change?

Of course, I really wanted more of an actual Fascist party than just a very, well, militarist party. I essentially wanted to be a Fascist for this thread, but due to the lack of any real fascists, I opted with things similiar to my real views. :p
 
We should not ask who cried first for blood, but rather, who shall stand supreme in the end. Marxism is like a road, you use it until you reach the end. And in the end we have anarchy. And that is why call it the end. So that we can have a new beginning.

Maybe we could just build the road indefinitely, that way there is no end, which means no anarchy:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.