Let the ruling classes tremble – an Interactive Revolutionary AAR

**Enewald** · 21-01-2011 07:38

By mortal men I meant how Marxists hold the views of their true prophets. Anything against their views is heresy.
The faction is looking like it were a personal cult around Marx-Lenin-Trotsky combo.
So, how do they differ from ideologies like Confucianism, Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, Islam and Christianity?
Holding pre-set views and refusing to change?
Crying out that war is our sacred 'obligation'. Marxism is already a cult, becoming a religion.
And by keeping them in power, we shall see how a new religion is being shaped.
A world of war and violence, oppression of the opposition, cleansing of heretical views such as capitalism.

Stop it!

Vote for Democratic Anarchists!
Save the republic, save yourselves!
Vote for a constitution and for a bloodless future!

**Moonstruck** · 21-01-2011 08:17

Just a general question, Tommy...

The last M-L vote was given by someone who registered the very same day, has no other posts and has no registered games. I am aware that everyone, newbie or not, deserves their chance, but at the same time, wouldn't it be a pity if an election was decided by this rather suspicious vote? I mean, it could very well be a newbie who just registered because of this awesome AAR, but it just seems more likely that it's a deliberate attempt at cheating.

**yourworstnightm** · 21-01-2011 08:31

It's still 29-29!! Will the election be solved with a fist fight or with bitch slapping if it end in a tie?

**keynes2.0** · 21-01-2011 08:38

Maybe a tie will mean that he splits the difference and gives the luxemburgists a chairmanship? Or maybe a hung election will give us a civil war and the national communists can come to power!

**WelshDude** · 21-01-2011 08:39

Originally Posted by Moonstruck

Just a general question, Tommy...

The last M-L vote was given by someone who registered the very same day, has no other posts and has no registered games. I am aware that everyone, newbie or not, deserves their chance, but at the same time, wouldn't it be a pity if an election was decided by this rather suspicious vote? I mean, it could very well be a newbie who just registered because of this awesome AAR, but it just seems more likely that it's a deliberate attempt at cheating.

Whether it's true or not, fellow DAs, don't get any ideas.

**thekonkoe** · 21-01-2011 08:39

I'm planning to vote DA if the vote is still a tie when I go to sleep (in several hours), otherwise I might vote NC and see if a tie is remade just to see how that would be.

**WelshDude** · 21-01-2011 08:41

Originally Posted by thekonkoe

I'm planning to vote DA if the vote is still a tie when I go to sleep (in several hours), otherwise I might vote NC and see if a tie is remade just to see how that would be.

Light at the end of the tunnel, comrades!

**Raph** · 21-01-2011 09:08

If there's a tie, shouldn't the current chairman cast a tie-braking vote?

**yourworstnightm** · 21-01-2011 09:21

Originally Posted by Raph

If there's a tie, shouldn't the current chairman cast a tie-braking vote?

Or the Assembly. Since that would be like asking the people for advice.

**Xanthippus** · 21-01-2011 09:24

Originally Posted by Raph

If there's a tie, shouldn't the current chairman cast a tie-braking vote?

No, because there are coalitions to determine such things.

**Phalanxia** · 21-01-2011 10:36

This is intense

**The Arch Mede** · 21-01-2011 10:38

If there is a tie, the top two should agree to stand down in favor of the third place candidate. That way both can be happy that their enemy hasn't won.

**Enewald** · 21-01-2011 11:01

Anarcho-Kadonists, National Communists and Luxemburgists would rather see Goldmann than Trotsky elected.
Why is it not that one needs a coalition to back one in order to get elected?

Please fellow comrades, choose Democratic Anarchists!
Stop Trotsky!

**Tommy4ever** · 21-01-2011 11:05

Originally Posted by The Arch Mede

If there is a tie, the top two should agree to stand down in favor of the third place candidate. That way both can be happy that their enemy hasn't won.

Yeah. That makes sense. Two factions who are the most popular and hate eachother should step aside and allow the less popular faction, and only faction the hate more than eachother, take power.

Originally Posted by Enewald

Anarcho-Kadonists, National Communists and Luxemburgists would rather see Goldmann than Trotsky elected.
Why is it not that one needs a coalition to back one in order to get elected?

Please fellow comrades, choose Democratic Anarchists!
Stop Trotsky!

What makes you think the NCs would necessarily favour the Democratic Anarchists? What makes you think the Democratic Anarchists would want their support?

The Luxemburgists are on the edge. Most would lean to Trotsky more than Goldman.

Still 29-29.

**yourworstnightm** · 21-01-2011 11:08

I think the Assembly should name the chairman if it end in a tie. Would favor Trotsky, I think, but it would show that the people's influence matter.

**elcidthehero** · 21-01-2011 11:10

You see, that fact that no one knows what's going to happen is exactly why we need a written constitution.

Vote Democratic Anarchists!

**yourworstnightm** · 21-01-2011 11:12

Ooh, this might not end in a tie!

**Enewald** · 21-01-2011 11:14

Fact being, we need a constitution to prevent the Red guards under Trotsky´s command from taking power in the name of the people.

**Tommy4ever** · 21-01-2011 11:16

Originally Posted by elcidthehero

You see, that fact that no one knows what's going to happen is exactly why we need a written constitution.

Vote Democratic Anarchists!

Is this a vote?

**yourworstnightm** · 21-01-2011 11:16

Originally Posted by Enewald

Fact being, we need a constitution to prevent the Red guards under Trotsky´s command from taking power in the name of the people.

So you dislike the people?

Thread: Let the ruling classes tremble – an Interactive Revolutionary AAR

Thread Tools

Posting Permissions