• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
It's all about the maps. The need to make a cool periodesque map is what motivates good updates. Though it kills your freetime as you search for names of cities in languages you don't speak that haven't existed in the region for 400 years.

So you want more maps? Okay!:D In the next update, there will be exactly 3 maps, all a bit different. Hope that satisfies the hunger. :p

I apologize for the late update that I said would be up by Wednesday. This was a brutal week for me with 1 exam, 2 tests and a 10 page paper on the ideology of liberty by three 18th century intellectuals. So I was a bit busy. However, the update will be made later today.

Sorry for the wait, guys! (and girls if there are some...hey you have to be politically correct ;))
 
Chapter IV – Poland’s Swan Song



By mid-year of 1407, the Kingdom of Hungary was standing strong against the alliance brought against them. Novgorod had bowed out of the war by signing a white peace in April of 1406. Poland’s armies were scattered throughout its own land with only one army led by King Zygmunt posing a viable threat against Hungary. Austria, for the time being was still occupied with France, allowing Lord Hunyadi to concentrate in the east. With the threat of Novgorod having been vanished, King Sigismund wanted to pick up on his earlier goal of chasing Zygmunt of Poland and capturing the king.

Yet, as the war has shown time after time, Sigismund’s plans were dashed when he received word that a large Lithuanian army had invaded Hungary. Sigismund, including Hunyadi and others were all shocked by Lithuanian’s involvement in the war. Though Lithuania always had good relations with the Poles, it was never thought that Lithuania would risk open war with Hungary.(1) Sigismund’s gamble that Lithuania would stay neutral had failed. The Duchy of Lithuania was helping their brother in arms in a considerable way. A small army of 2,000 Lithuanians scouted eastern Hungary reaching Partium before being confronted by a detached army of Sigismund’s right guard. A battle took place on April 21, 1407. The battle was an overwhelming victory for the Huns, for the Lithuanians were lightly armored to allow them to cover a large distance of land in a minimal amount of time. The Huns destroyed the scouting army with many Lithuanians perishing in the battle while others were taken prisoner. Only a handful of Lithuanians were able to escape and flee back east toward the main part of the army.

Sigismund made the mistake in thinking the scouting army was the threat the report described. He moved his army north to invade Poland once again. With Sigismund’s tactical error, the report’s actual threat, a large Lithuanian army numbering 12,000 men was free to march on Pecs to besiege the Hungarian capitol, Buda.

As Sigismund’s army marched to Poland, they met resistance in Ersekujvar. Nearly 3,000 Polish solders were ransacking and pillaging Hungarian villages. The Poles, led by a daring and greedy man, General Brzezia, had no respect for the Huns. The army stole, raped and killed before burning everything else. Rumors that an army of pillagers was in the region had caught the ear of Sigismund months before, but the King believed the rumors to be false; a ruse the Polish concocted to divert and distract his army. The devastation the King saw on the way through Ersekujvar angered him. The Huns were devastated over the destruction the Poles had created. Lowly farmers, herdsmen, and other peaceful folk had received the brunt of war. Many sons in the Hungarian army saw their homes completely burned and some were even unfortunate to learn of a family member’s death occurred during the Polish rampage. By the time, Sigismund encountered the army of General Brzezia, it had killed over 400 civilians, ransacked three whole villages and burned fields worth over $800,000 ducats. Emotion running high and adrenaline taking its effect, the army of General Brzezia was quickly routed and picked apart by the vengeful Huns. In all, the Huns suffered only 80 casualties in the battle whereas the Poles were completely massacred to the last man. King Sigismund did nothing to restrain his men. (2)

erse_1407.jpg

Surviving accounts were scarce for the battle, yet one bone chilling account exist that vividly describes the brutality and blood cries witnessed in the battle and its aftermath. As a Magyar nobleman, Emeric Khuen de Belasi wrote,

“The impending battle with the Poles had gripped the men’s fervor to revenge what had been lost the past couple months. The wretched Poles were taken by surprise in our devastating and quick ambush on their camp. Most of the Poles were still sleeping as our men slowly and enjoyably took vengeance. The men who wrestled awake had barely enough time to grab their swords. The Poles were screaming to their comrades for help, but no help would arrive. I saw one Polish soldier surrendering to a couple of our men. The surrendered Pole was on his knees begging for his life. One of the Huns without hesitation went over to the Pole and pierced the helpless man through the chest. The Hun kicked the soldier off his sword as blood poured out of the wound and onto the damp grass beneath them. The carnage was awful. Countless Poles were savagely hacked to death in their sleep, with no warning or pause from our army. There was nothing left that would remotely remind you of a Polish army. Only the dismembered and bloody remains of unfortunate bastards paying the price for their sins. We have done our duty this day. We have sent those poor souls to meet the Maker and He will judge them accordingly. “

While Sigismund’s army was slaughtering Poles in the north, Lord Hunyadi’s army was quickly marching back to Pecs in hope of intercepting the Lithuanians before they reached Buda. The same spies that had warned Sigismund of the Lithuanian threat immediately traveled to Hunyadi hoping he would listen. Initially enraged by Sigismund’s complete disregard of the homeland once again, Hunyadi immediately sent out request for mercenaries to supplement his ranks. In the early part of 1407, Hunyadi had allowed furloughs for many of the soldiers to return to their homes. Even though the men had earned it, Hunyadi was no facing an army that outnumbered his 3:1. Any hope of defeating the army would lie upon hired mercenaries.(3)

By the beginning of August 1407, Lord Hunyadi had traversed Hungary and arrived outside of Buda. Awaiting him were the mercenaries he had hired earlier in the year. With the 6,000 mercenaries and the 1,500 Huns garrisoned in Buda, Hunyadi now had an army he could use to defend the capitol. Hunyadi inspected the mercenaries and was relatively displeased with their character and appearance. Most of the mercenaries were Italians, though some were German and French. Though displeased, the general was fortunate to have them and the mercenaries would prove themselves quite useful in the next coming months. The Lithuanian army numbering well over 14,000 men reached Pecs in late August. Defenses around the city were still being built and Hunyadi knew the city would only be able to hold a siege for a few months. The garrison commander failed to store food and supplies for a lengthy siege. A pitch battle would be the only option, which could end disastrously for the Huns. The ensuing battle on August 23 was not as momentous as the Lithuanians may have wanted, and it was not the disaster Hunyadi dreaded. A failed reinforcement maneuver by the Lithuanian army allowed the Huns to reinforce its own failing right flank, which would ultimately save the day. The battle would last for only two hours and casualties were relatively light for both sides. It is believed that if the Lithuanians were able to press the right flank of the Hungarian army, the army would have broken. Yet, one small mistake by a commander echoes a much larger fatal outcome. With Buda saved, the Lithuanians withdrew from Pecs. Hunyadi not wanting them to regroup chased them into Pressburg. A larger battle was fought in Pressburg on December 16. Yet, again a decisive victory could not be had by either side as the battle ended as a draw. However, casualties were considerably higher in the Battle of Pressburg with over 7,000 men falling on both sides. The Battle of Pressburg in early October would be the final engagement of 1407.

pressburg_1407.jpg
The Battle of Pressburg failed to achieve the victory King Sigismund yearned.​

Hunyadi’s army established winter quarters in the province of Ersekujvar. With his army camped in the winter, Lord Branabus Hunyadi and his aid-de-camp would travel to Krakow in December of 1407 for a summons of nobles called by King Sigismund.(4) Many Hungarian nobles answered the summons and traveled to Krakow to meet with their king. Sigismund desperately needed his nobility to help in the current war. The kingdom’s treasury was empty and Sigismund personally had used some of his family’s wealth to fund a few months of campaigning in Poland. However, money was running dry and without the help of his nobility, he would not be able to afford to keep the mercenaries in the army. Sigismund’s army including Hunyadi’s army were weak and would not be able to sustain with another extended campaign. After the winter, Sigismund knew the war would be lost in only a few months. Their exhausted and depleted armies would lose against the fresh Lithuanians, the experienced Austrians and the smaller but morale driven Poles. Through the current war, the Hungarian nobility had only supported their king with hollow words. The nobility refused to send their armies to campaign, though some nobles did help Hunyadi in defense of Carpathia and Pecs. The nobility knew Sigismund needed their support.

Not many records exist that explain exactly what occurred in Krakow in the weeks of December, but one thing is for certain, the outcome gave Sigismund the support he so desperately needed while the nobility gained an upper hand against the king and the Hungarian court. King Sigismund agreed to the principles of liberum veto, which states that unanimity among the court is needed for any decision to be enacted in Hungary. It was a very powerful notion and victory for the Hungarian nobility. Simultaneously, it was a thorough defeat for Sigismund’s overall claim to power on the Hungarian throne.(5) No longer would the king be able to force his nobility to support his actions. Politics, it seems would have to be the mainstay in his ability to control the nobles and his throne. Though it was a humiliating concession on behalf of the king, it did give him the support to continue the war. The nobility promised 10,000 men to the cause of defeating the alliance of Poland, Lithuania and Austria. This decision made in December of 1407 would be a defining moment for the future birth of the Hungarian empire.

liberum_veto.jpg

Liberum Veto gave Sigismund the support he needed but for a grave price

In 1408, the beginning of spring introduced many battles in Poland and Hungary as the War for the Polish Throne continued. The Hungarian nobles promise of men stayed true and the reinforcement of the Hungarian armies allowed Sigismund and Hunyadi to win average victories through the year. These victories include the Battle of Krakow in February, the Battle of Siradz in April and the Battle of Lublin in September. Yet, the Huns did not only see a string of victories for their armies. The Hungarians also lost a couple key battles during 1408 consisting of the Battle of Lublin in May and the Battle of Ruthenia in September. These two defeats cost over 3,800 Hungarian lives. In the end of 1408, the Huns had failed to win a decisive victory against the Poles.

Sigismund was getting frustrated with the war. It was dragging into its fifth year, and the Kingdom of Hungary was experiencing the ravages of war. The economy was nearly stagnant; most of the country’s merchants had gone bankrupt during the years. Yet worse, the Kingdom of Hungary was in massive debt, and soon some of the loans would be called in. Most of the loaning houses were getting impatient with Hungary; it had done nothing but squandered its money on a fruitless war. Hungary had seen victory, yes, but the status quo still existed. Thousands of Huns had died through the five years of war with very little gained. More and more Magyars were wavering under the growing famine of the country, the deaths of their sons, and the crippling taxes forced upon them by their king. Some nobles including Branabus Hunyadi did all they could in helping the poor peasantry. Even with limited help, the peasantry was failing fast. If Sigismund did not gain a decisive victory soon, the Kingdom of Hungary would simply fall apart.

hunyadi_foodhelp.jpg

Lord Hunyadi helping the Hungarian citizenry with food donations from his family's stores

During the early part of 1409, the war continued to be a static entity with no clear winner or loser. Sigismund’s campaign in Poland was gaining territory, yet he could not engage the enemy in a single battle. The king captured province after province but no army clashed with him. It seemed Poland was trying to win a war of attrition, a war that could finally beat the Huns. However, Lithuania had other intentions.

In June of 1409, an army of consisting of Poles and Lithuanians crossed into Hungary to march on Pecs. The Polish King Zygmunt I was convinced by the Lithuanians to agree to one large attack on the Magyar capitol. With Sigismund occupied in Poland, Buda was left with few defenses. They knew Lord Hunyadi with an army of 13,000 men was in Hungary, but they believed his position was closer to the east on the border of Lithuania. Their army marched unopposed straight to Pecs where they began to siege Buda. The defenders of Buda were much better prepared for a siege than in previous years mainly due to the instruction of Hunyadi. A messenger was secretly sent from the besieged city to warn Hunyadi whose army was in Partium. After receiving word of the siege, Hunyadi’s army made excellent timing and was in Pecs by early July. What he saw before him was a Polish-Lithuanian grand army numbering well over 16,000 men. They were heavily encamped, well supplied and in good morale. The Hun’s position was precarious at best. They were outnumbered, but Hunyadi had no choice but attempt to lift the siege.

buda_battle_1409.jpg

Branabus Hunyadi's battle plan in the Siege of Buda, 1409

What would later be known as the Siege of Buda began on July 8, 1409 with the main part of the Hungarian army led by General Khan crossing the Danube River. King Zygmunt of Poland rearranged his forces to meet the Huns head on. He knew he outnumbered the Hungarians and due to this was fairly confident in his capability to win. The Lithuanians led by Lord Zvitrigaila were positioned in the north to siege the capitol of Buda from another focal point. With the Hun’s crossing, Lord Zvitrigaila would move the bulk of his army to the south to reinforce Zygmunt’s army. King Zygmunt’s left small guard positions at the bridges believing that the entire Hungarian force had crossed from the south.(6) This error in judgment allowed Lord Hunyadi with a detachment of 4,000 men to sneak through the Buda forest and surprise the small guard in the north of the city. The Polish soldiers, caught completely unaware were quickly killed or captured. This allowed Hunyadi to wheel around the capitol and surprise Zygmunt’s army from behind.

Scouts informed Hunyadi that Zvitrigaila’s main force was slowly making its way to the front, probably due to it believing victory was a forgone conclusion. Wanting to catch the Lithuanians before reaching the front, Hunyadi rushed his men around Buda castle. The Huns covered ground with amazing speed and found the main force of the Lithuanians only 500 yards away. By this time, Zvitrigaila noticed Hunyadi and began to turn his army around. Before the Lithuanians were in position, a large Hungarian cavalry charge of 3,500 men slammed into the center of the Lithuanians. The Lithuanians numbered well over 6,000 men yet surprising the Lithuanians along with the charge broke their center. Zvitrigaila tried to rally his soldiers as countless men fell under the sword. The rally was beginning to work until a Hun cavalryman struck Zvitrigaila. The lord fell from his horse, mortally wounded. Under the bloody frenzy, horses would trample Lord Zvitrigaila’s body. It was not known what killed him first, the sword or the horse. With the death of Zvitrigaila, the Lithuanians would lose much of their fight and flee. Hunyadi’s cavalry briefly chased the Lithuanians, slashing and hacking retreating soldiers.

While Hunyadi was fighting the Lithuanians, General Khan was commanding the main part of the Hungarian army against King Zygmunt. Trusting that Hunyadi would take care of Zygmunt’s reinforcements, he ordered his left flank to wheel around and attack the right flank of Zgymunt’s army. General Khan did not want to waste any time as he simultaneously ordered a frontal assault as well. The maneuvers by General Khan took Zgymunt by surprise as he anticipated that the Huns would be more cautious. Noticing the Huns barely had any cavalry in formation, he ordered his cavalry to charge the flanking Huns and intercept them before they reached his infantry. This would signal the end for Zygmunt for it effectively separated him from the rest of his army. Though tactically intelligent to issue the charge, Zygmunt had little clue that Hunyadi was about to attack his army from the rear. The Polish King and his cavalry charged into the prepared Hungarian lines. The Poles had the clear advantage as many Huns were falling. However, before the Huns wavered, Hunyadi with his own cavalry attacked Zgymunt’s rear. The Polish cavalry being squeezed by two Hungarian armies quickly broke. In the confusion, Zygmunt was struck in the throat and instantly killed. The demise of the Polish King was not known for some time by the rest of the army. The Polish cavalry were completely decimated, yet the main part of the army continued to fight Khan’s assault. Slowly, the Poles soon saw the surviving cavalry was running off the field, not toward the main body of the army. Believing that their King had given up and was retreating disheartened the Poles and they soon fled.

hunyadi_buda.jpg

The Siege of Buda was a brilliant and overwhelming victory for Hunyadi and Hungary

The Siege of Buda was an overwhelming victory for the Huns. The combined armies of Lithuania and Poland were completely crushed by Hunyadi. His brilliance once again had protected Hungary, but this time he also had done what his own king, Sigismund could not. He had killed King Zygmunt. The Polish throne was now vacant. Sigismund received the victory he needed to sway the war into Hungarian favor. Soon after the news of the sound defeat reached the Lithuanian King, he signed a separate peace with Hungary in September of 1409. The Austrians, never being a factor in the war signed its own separate peace in October of 1409 after seeing Lithuania bow out of the war. With no allies to help and no king on the throne, Poland was helpless. King Sigismund would sign a peace with Polish nobles in Krakow on December 1, 1409. The treaty announced that King Sigismund of Hungary would rule Poland under a union of the thrones. Poland would also cede Lublin and Ruthenia to the Huns. The rest of Poland would continue to be ruled by its own nobility, who rightfully agreed of Sigismund’s claim to the Polish throne.

polishpeace_1409.jpg

Peace treaty between Poland and Hungary in 1409

map_1409.jpg

The Kingdom of Hungary at the end of the War for the Polish Throne in 1409

The war was over. Yet as Sigismund rode through the streets of Buda like a victor, he could not help but notice that the bulk of the praise from the inhabitants was not directed at him, but to the man beside him, Lord Branabus Hunyadi.

hungary_domains_1409.jpg

The Kingdom of Hungary and its domains with the rest of the world in the beginning of 1410


----------------------------------​

(1) - It was later known that the Duchy of Lithuania risked open war with Hungary only due to the invasion of Novgorod by Muscowy. With the Rus' attention away from their borders, Lithuania was allowed to aid Poland.

(2) - It has been debated by historians if King Sigismund actually allowed his men to massacre the Poles or if he was just incapable in controlling his own army's bloody vengeance.

(3) - With the last bit of money in the treasury, 6 divisions of mercenaries were hired to supplement the shrinking Hungarian army.

(4) - It was noted by Branabus Hunyadi that he found it folly that the king would issue a summons in Krakow, enemy territory. Though the city had fallen a year past, a summons of all nobles posed a very delicate security problem. However, King Sigismund wanted to show the nobles as well as the rest of Europe a show of strength and power for himself and Hungary. Unfortunately, all that Europe saw of it was a desperate but ultimately failed attempt by Sigismund to be accepted as a ruler of a powerful kingdom in Eastern Europe.

(5) - The announcement of the Liberum Veto in 1407 came as a surprise for most of Europe. It was the first time in European history that a monarchy would give such power to the nobility. Though later it would be seen as innovative and the first step to a bill of rights for a country's general population, it still must be kept in mind that Sigismund was forced to accept such terms. Without it, he would never have gained the nobility's support and eventually he would have lost the war and the Hungarian throne in the process.

(6) - This was the single most important decision made prior to the battle. Earlier in the week, Zygmunt received initial spy reports that Hungarian scouts were seen in Buda Forest. The King of Poland perceived it to be only reconnaissance for enemy positions by the Huns, nothing more. It would later be discovered that the Polish King heard rumors that Hunyadi would divide his force to attack Buda, but again Zygmunt dismissed it as only a rumor.
 
Eww, was it really worth it?
I would have sought peace earlier.
The strategy is to eat first your weaker neighbours, not to attack the strongest one. :p
 
So wait, is Lithuania still in a personal union with Poland?

Anyways great update, as always :D
 
Eww, was it really worth it?
I would have sought peace earlier.
The strategy is to eat first your weaker neighbours, not to attack the strongest one. :p

He did, sort of, he attacked a medium neighbor who happened to be allied to two stronger ones. How does the claim to the throne cassus belli work? Is it random for the most part or can you choose to claim the throne of whoever you want?
 
Eww, was it really worth it?
I would have sought peace earlier.
The strategy is to eat first your weaker neighbours, not to attack the strongest one. :p

Well the war did last much longer than I expected. It's definitely not my strongest neighbor though. Austria, the Ottomans, Bohemia (due to being emperor) and even Lithuania were stronger. I didn't want to have peace earlier because I had lost my entire manpower and had taken out the maximum of loans. If I got a white peace, nothing would have been gained. Yes, I took a risk because I was close to being overran, but the risk turned out to be worth it. Now Poland is subjugated.

The war just lasted a while because I had to fight off all its allies, but once they were gone, Poland was easy pickings. Sorry my strategy grosses you out. :p


Kapt Torbjorn said:
So wait, is Lithuania still in a personal union with Poland?

Anyways great update, as always

I don't think so. I know I fought Lithuanian's king once in a battle so I don't think they were still under a union? I have no idea why not, but honestly I didn't pay too much attention to it. And thank you. My battle scene does not even begin to compare to yours but... I digress...

Porkman said:
He did, sort of, he attacked a medium neighbor who happened to be allied to two stronger ones. How does the claim to the throne cassus belli work? Is it random for the most part or can you choose to claim the throne of whoever you want?

The claim to the throne CB works if you have a royal marriage and you decide to try and "claim their throne." Now, yes it is a nice and automatic CB, but any nation you had a royal marriage with lowers your relations with them by a good amount. So a few nations including Austria, Bohemia, Transylvania, and Moldavia were not too happy with me.

The unfortunate thing is that most of Europe doesn't like me very much except Transylvania. My BB is down but it's difficult to get allies now. At the moment, only Transylvania and Brandenburg are my allies.

Originally, my plan was never to attack Poland. I wanted to take annex Transylvania and take out Moldavia. However, that quickly changed.:D Poland was just annoying me and at the moment I declared war, they seemed weak and for the taking...so why not? Little did I know, their allies would put up a bigger fight than them. Take goodness for the French and Rus. :D One thing that surprised me was Austria. They never really gave me much resistance. I kept an army stationed on the west thinking they would come but never really did. Strange, really.
 
Hey guys...just wanted to say I'm sorry for not updating in a few days. This week is brutal since it's the second week of midterms. I should have an update up by tomorrow. Thanks for bearing with me all (if there is anyone out there....*hears crickets*)
 
I can't believe I didn't reply earlier! Sorry.

This was a fantastic update! I love how you use the maps to good effect, and the narrative is great, especially the battle!
 
Epic update, Eber! Really an excellently worked out tactical battle plan. Lucky for you that the battle worked out so well in-game. The introduction of the Liberum Veto does not bode that well however for the near future, though from note #5 apparently you recovered well later in the game (or at least, it seems as if you did, no idea how far you played ahead).
 
I want to point out to everyone the AARland Choice Awards 2010! The new round has started and it's important that all of the AAR community participates. It's a great way to honor those writers you enjoy and it's simply the best way to keep our community alive and active! So go to this link and vote!

AARland Choice Awards 2010
 
Ashantai said:
I can't believe I didn't reply earlier! Sorry.

This was a fantastic update! I love how you use the maps to good effect, and the narrative is great, especially the battle!

Don't apologize, everyone is busy. Heck, I've been busy all this week. I just said *crickets* as a little comedic relief. :D But thank you for the compliment and response. It's nice to feel appreciated. :)

Qorten said:
Epic update, Eber! Really an excellently worked out tactical battle plan. Lucky for you that the battle worked out so well in-game. The introduction of the Liberum Veto does not bode that well however for the near future, though from note #5 apparently you recovered well later in the game (or at least, it seems as if you did, no idea how far you played ahead).

Thanks Qorten for the amazing compliment! The battle was definitely a blessing because if it turned around and I lost that many men, I would have lost the war for sure. Liberum Veto does, indeed wreak havoc in the future if you're not careful. If you accept, events will fire that can lead to some trouble and less centralized government. Yet, I had to accept. I couldn't pass up about 10,000 men for free when the war was going south for Hungary. It came in a perfect time. I haven't played too far, only up to around 1440s. So far it hasn't affected me, but then again that could be for some reasons that I can't disclose at the moment. ;)

Van5 said:
Excellent

Thanks!

The update will be tomorrow. I'm sorry for the wait, I really am! I promise though that tomorrow it will be up!

Also, again, don't forget to vote in the AARland Choice Awards! Even if it's not for this AAR, there are some amazing AARs in EU3, Victoria, HOI3 and beyond that deserve recognition. Until tomorrow!
 
im currently playing a little game as slovakia where i released slovakia as a duchy in the three northern provinces. as a player in this area, you have only so many options. the provinces in the east tend to be too poor and with the wrong culture. to the west initially it is not easy to expand since they are part of the empire. so the way is against one of the other larger neighbours - poland if you play hungary, or vice versa. as slovakia i went after poland, leaving hungary as a buffer state between me and the ottoman empire.

anyway, i've just started reading this aar and its a very interesting read! i love your maps especially :)
 
Chapter V - Healing Wounds and Finances


The War for the Polish Throne lasted for five long years before peace was seen once again in Eastern Europe. The war, though hugely successful had taken its toll on Hungary and its people. An extended war had dramatic effects on society from the upper nobility to the peasantry. Much of the impact fell upon the peasantry, as they were the last to receive any aid. It was rather common under feudal societies for nobles to raise taxes on its subjects during a war. Taxes were already difficult to bear for most peasants so raised taxes were nearly detrimental to peasant society. As many peasants paid taxes with their food crops, war often times spelled food shortages and prolonged hunger for peasant families.

Nobles took advantage of their peasants on a regular basis. These same peasants were unable to complain to any higher authorities, the nobility was the law. However, things began to change in the late 1390s in Hungary. With the appointment of Kalman Dessewffy to High Judge in the Hungarian court, the justice system rapidly changed under his direction. Dessewffy believed that a centralized state could only exist with a centralized court. Too often, nobles took the law in their own hands. Frequently, the laws would be different for peasants under one lord to another. Because of this, Dessewffy, with the King’s blessing established a judicial court in 1402 that would later be known as the Royal Justice Court of Hungary. The court had a pretty simple system of justice with each county of Hungary having its own County Justice. The County Justices would report to a select number of Chief Justices, new ones being appointed with new territories gained. These Chief Justices, which numbered twelve in 1409, would then report to the High Judge. Though the system was simple, its simplicity was the prime reason it worked well for the kingdom until the 19th century. The peasantry knew exactly who to see when any squabbles or the like affected them. The law, the peasantry believed was now for all Hungarians, not just the privileged.

dessewffy_1409.jpg

Kalman Dessewffy would help gain peasant confidence in the royal government

Of course, the nobles were not extremely pleased with instituting a judicial system that eliminated some power from the nobility. Yet, Kalman Dessewffy understood the need for the nobility to not feel as though some just control quickly slipped away. Dessewffy convinced King Sigismund to enact a law where all claims that were issued to the county courts, the nobles would collect 75% of the court fees, where the other 25% went to the royal treasury. Though the nobles had lost some administrative power in their counties, the new judicial system gave more time to the nobility while also bringing in some extra income to their own coffers as well. Dessewffy was an administrative genius and with his judicial system, stability was higher in a country where instability was usually the norm. The peasantry, at least was satisfied with Sigismund’s rule. The same could not be said for the nobility.

Due to the unhappiness of the nobility, one noble took it upon himself to show the dissatisfaction the upper nobility had toward their king’s rule. In August of 1411, a noble named Fadir Vashchenko assembled a small army and began laying waste to the countryside of Ruthenia. The reign of Sigismund I saw many rebellions, yet this one was of particular interest due to the noble who lead the revolt. Fadir Vashchenko was a first generation noble, receiving his title due to loyal service to King Sigismund.(1) One of the few landless nobles entitled by Sigismund in his reign, Vashchenko was not in a position of power in the court. However, Fadir had a remarkable talent for politics and he used his talent well to convince the more powerful nobles to sway to his cause. His sly tongue and cunning earned him some strong yet secretive support to try to usurp Sigismund’s throne. These more influential nobles chose to stay anonymous in fear of Fadir’s failure. If he failed, they would continue in their privileged state with no worry of reprisal.

pretender_1411.jpg

The rebellion of Fadir Vashchenko was a surprise to King Sigismund's supporters

With their support, Fadir was able to assemble an army of 9,000 men. Fadir Vashchenko claimed Sigismund was depleting the nobility’s rights. He believed if Sigismund continued to rule in Hungary, the nobility were only going to be landowners with no real pull in the government. This is important in the broad span of things for he was fighting for the nobility, not the common people. Due to this, support would be limited unless most of the nobility supported Fadir, which they did not. Fadir Vashchenko’s rebellion only lasted for two months before it was violently put down by General Kan’s army. The king pardoned the common soldiers, but the leaders were put to death. Fadir, himself was spared execution due to being impaled by a lance in the final Battle of Ruthenia.

battle_ruthenia_1411.jpg

A brief battle and a quick end to Fadir Vashchenko

Though King Sigismund quelled the rebellion, further problems arose in the late months of 1411. A few nobles in the royal court committed to alliances with an outside state behind the back of Sigismund. The few nobles who had ties in Moldavia formed partnerships and close alliances with nobles in the Moldavian court. These close relations usually dictated economic terms, yet occasionally military support could be included with these alliances. This spelled a problem for the king, for Hungarian nobles supporting Moldavia, especially in a war could involuntarily drag Hungary into the war. The royal court needed to see eye-to-eye on all alliances, economic or not. With these noble alliances in 1411, Sigismund understood the delicate position he was in. The nobles, even with his victorious war over Poland had not given him their respect. The victory Sigismund saw was only unneeded bloodshed and greed in the eyes of the nobility.

ally_foreign_1411.jpg

Continued problems with the nobility plagued Sigismund's reign

Sensing never-ending trouble with the nobility, Sigismund commissioned Russian artist, Andrei Rublev to paint a fresco to commemorate his noble reign. The Russian artist was known during his day as a master of icons and frescoes. A considerable sum was charged for the Russian master to travel to Buda and reside in the city for the three months that it took to finish the fresco. The fresco, which was finished in July of 1412, is widely considered to be one of the best works of Andrei Rublev. The fresco shows King Sigismund in his study dictating to a scribe. Showing Sigismund’s passion for legislation, it portrays Sigismund’s reign as one of administrative feats, not military victories.

painting_1411.jpg

This fresco painted by Andrei Rublev tried to signify the importance of Sigismund's administrative feats

Following the philosophy of his fresco, in January of 1414, King Sigismund oversaw and administered the opening of the National Bank of Hungary.(2) Considered to be the pinnacle of his reign, the National Bank of Hungary would be the first nationalized bank in Europe. With heavy debt due to the war with Poland, Sigismund nationalized all debt and commerce within the country. No longer would each noble have the functionality of being a bank to its own peasants. The National Bank would serve all Hungarians, noble or not. Because of this, Hungary saw lower interest on its loans; lower inflation and it increased the speed of repaying matured loans.

national_bank.jpg

The National Bank of Hungary in Buda

With the introduction of the National Bank of Hungary, advisors to the king urged more monetary reforms to stimulate the economy and pull Hungary further from debt. These reforms, enacted in December of 1415, included taxes on merchant activity, increased taxes on the nobility, and the creation of a “Master of Mint” that would help oversee all manners of the economy. The man chosen to be the very first “Master of Mint” was Gabor Nadasdy. A Hungarian noble, Nadasdy would be the driving force in reducing the increased market prices after the Polish war. His remarkable ability allowed the Kingdom of Hungary to produce more coin for the treasury without saturating the economy and bring down its overall value.

nadasdy_1414.jpg

Gabor Nadasdy would be a blessing to Hungary's economic recovery and future prosperity in the early 15th century

Following his administrative success, King Sigismund would meet with the nobles of Hungary as well as the nobles of its vassal state, Transylvania in a grand forum in Buda. Here, Transylvania’s nobility accepted King Sigismund’s proposal of annexation. The lands of Transylvania would be fully incorporated into the Kingdom of Hungary as dictated in the grand forum on January 14, 1417. The reasons stated for Transylvania’s acceptance were due to the increased Ottoman threat, which had already conquered Serbia and were encroaching on Moldavian territory; a failing economy which saw Hungary with its new monetary reforms as its salvation; and the promise of Sigismund that all Transylvanian nobles would keep their lands and titles.

annexation_transylvania.jpg

Other Catholic kingdoms in Europe including Austria, Bohemia and France joyfully commended the annexation of Transylvania by the Kingdom of Hungary as a victory for Catholicism in Eastern Europe. Though the rest of Europe accepted the annexation, there were some opponents in Hungary. These opponents to the annexation cited that the integration of Transylvania would cause legislative problems in the royal court. Also the Transylvanian population being orthodox posed a small problem with the overwhelming Catholic majority of Hungary. Opponents also stressed that the annexation would upset the balance of power in Eastern Europe and could potentially upset the Ottoman Turk. Yet, even with some resistance, the annexation of Transylvania was popular among most Magyars as many considered the Transylvanians as brothers, for many dealt with them on a consistent basis.

map_1417.jpg

The Kingdom of Hungary following the annexation of Transylvania in 1417

By 1417, the Kingdom of Hungary had become the premiere kingdom in Eastern Europe. It had subjugated Poland, defeated Lithuania and Novgorod, and annexed Transylvania. King Sigismund I von Luxembourg was king to the eastern-most defense against the Ottomans and the Rus. The Kingdom of Hungary was now seen in a new light, a legitimately powerful state with a people hungry for greatness.

hungary_score_1417.jpg

Hungary's position of power and influence in Europe in 1417

Nevertheless, even with the kingdom experiencing victory and a growing influential sphere in the east, Sigismund’s throne was still tentatively troubled with nobles scheming for the crown. For the next five years, Hungary would see peace and growing prosperity.

Yet in 1422, all of Hungary would erupt in a gale of turmoil and rebellion.

rebellion_1422.jpg

The beginning of the Magyar Rebellion (3) in 1422


--------------------------------------------------​


(1) - Fadir Vashchenko received his title due to loyal service in fighting against the Ottoman Empire in the late 14th century. His heroic effort helped save hundreds of Hungarians from absolute slaughter by the Turks.
(2) - The National Bank of Hungary took years of thought and debate among nobles for it to finally be acceptable to the court. It would be the model of future national banks. It paved the way for great economic activity in Hungary and gave more confidence to merchants and citizens of Hungary's economic health.
(3) - The Magyar Rebellion was the beginning of a loud cry of nationalism among Hungarians that would ultimately be seen as the birth of the Hungarian Empire
 
Excellent update! :)
 
Nobles having enough of the incessant innovations of their king, which they thought they had on a leesh with the Liberum Veto?
 
im currently playing a little game as slovakia where i released slovakia as a duchy in the three northern provinces. as a player in this area, you have only so many options. the provinces in the east tend to be too poor and with the wrong culture. to the west initially it is not easy to expand since they are part of the empire. so the way is against one of the other larger neighbours - poland if you play hungary, or vice versa. as slovakia i went after poland, leaving hungary as a buffer state between me and the ottoman empire.

anyway, i've just started reading this aar and its a very interesting read! i love your maps especially :)

Thank you! I do hope you continue to stay with us during the course of the AAR. :) You're pretty much dead on when it comes to strategy with countries in Eastern Europe. It's somewhat impossible to expand without going to war with a bigger neighbor. That's what makes it so impressive when players can take small countries (like Slovakia by you and Transylvania by Kapt Torbjorn) and turn them into powers. Honestly, I didn't really have much of a game-play strategy to begin with. I had some goals but didn't know who I would attack first or what not. Poland was more of a fluke than anything.

Ashantai said:
Excellent update!

Thank you!

mayorqw said:
Thats a lot of rebels! I hate cliffhangers. But alas, they are necessary to keep suspense in an AAR
Loved the description of the reforms.

It is a lot of rebels...especially when some are 5-8k large. I love cliffhangers. :p And thank you for your compliment on my reform descriptions. It was rather difficult writing a large update where there was really no battles but reforms. That was one reason why it took me so long to finally update besides the fact of me being extremely busy that past week.

Enewald said:
I cry for republic!

And Bosnia, Sbrja, And Vlachs do not count as barriers?

hehe...republic...bah! :D And no, they are not barriers. :p But seriously, they are not mainly because Bosnia and Serbia are both vassals of the Turks. Wallachia is somewhat of a buffer but they're incredibly small and the Turks are really eyeing them. I was trying to get Moldavia and Wallachia into an alliance with me but they would not accept at all! They both prefer to be in alliances with Venice (like they would help!) and Muscowy. They upset me. It's best not to get me upset if I'm 5x your size. ;)

Qorten said:
Nobles having enough of the incessant innovations of their king, which they thought they had on a leesh with the Liberum Veto?

Well...I have never played a game where I continued to get rebellions, be it for one thing or another (but then again I never played the Golden Horde or any other tribal country.) The nobles have never been happy with a Luxembourg on the royal throne, which is surprising since they're the ones that voted him onto the throne in the first place. You'll see why the rebellion occurs in the next update. I think you might be surprised.
 
Last edited:
My word that's a ton of rebellions.

Also find it very humorous that there's both a Gabor and a Kálmán in your most recent update. :p