Yes, because the British fought an all out war against all of India at once and subjugated the subcontinent in 6 years.
Not to mention the fact that Britain had the most powerful navy in the world and basically controlled global commerce.
Yes, because the British fought an all out war against all of India at once and subjugated the subcontinent in 6 years.
Yes, because the British fought an all out war against all of India at once and subjugated the subcontinent in 6 years.
Everyone should pile on Japan and destroy them, just like the UK was destroyed for bringing India into their empire!
"The War started because because the Vile Hun and his villanous empire building!"
'George, The British Empire, at present, covers a quarter of the Globe, while German Empire consists of a small sausage factory in Tanganyika. I hardly think we can entirely absolved of blame on the Imperialistic front.'
"Oh Sir! Oh no, Sir! Absolutely not! ... mad as a bicycle!"
Baldrick: No, the thing is: The way I see it, these days there's a war on,
right? and, ages ago, there wasn't a war on, right? So, there must
have been a moment when there not being a war on went away, right?
and there being a war on came along. So, what I want to know is:
How did we get from the one case of affairs to the other case of
affairs?
Edmund: Do you mean "How did the war start?"
Baldrick: Yeah.
Couldn't resist Nicely illustrates the sanity of WW1... though it's unlikely we'll get a chance to try it out in V2...
Those last 2 events are juicy and flavoursome! I love those kind of events.
Those last 2 events are juicy and flavoursome! I love those kind of events.
Really? Because I just find it stupid (or funny, depending on how you look at it) that the Chinese are literally pretending that they have always loved Japan and been under their rule forever even though the whole country is still recovering from having its countryman brutally slaughtered in the millions the year earlier.
If this scenario made even a shred of sense then the Chinese would be creating underground resistance movements and planning uprisings. I said it before and I am saying it again, this game needs more balancing.
Really? Because I just find it stupid (or funny, depending on how you look at it) that the Chinese are literally pretending that they have always loved Japan and been under their rule forever even though the whole country is still recovering from having its countryman brutally slaughtered in the millions the year earlier.
If this scenario made even a shred of sense then the Chinese would be creating underground resistance movements and planning uprisings. I said it before and I am saying it again, this game needs more balancing.
Some Chinese seek favor with their new rulers, that's hardly unimaginable. Meanwhile 100 million others are either just trying to feed their families or actively plotting rebellion. Where's the problem, other than semantically?
Great AAR, Singleton. The impossible is nothing! (Ahem)
Of course the game needs balancing, it isn't even out yet. In due time they will make changes, so keep voicing your opinion.
China is already strong enough, it should be apparent that they produce too much of the worlds goods (although they consume most of it?). I don't think Japan is too strong, I think the effects of war are too weak. War exhaustion should mount much higher and effective casualties should be increased by at least a factor of 2. Mobilization should effectively devastate a nation's economy in a matter of years. To be honest, I have no idea how much damage it does currently, but it doesn't seem significant enough. Just my two cents...