• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Kurt, Agent Larkin -

I think you've missed my point. I don't care that Hitler's dead. For a corporal to die in the last hours of the Great War is hardly extraordinary. It is that Churchill kills Hitler in the very last minutes of the war. This is akin, for instance, to saying "And then Captain Nelson leveled his pistol, pulled the trigger, and shot the French officer directing the artillery battery above Toulon. The city would fall no matter what, but the young General Bonaparte would not live to see it." Why? Why does Churchill himself have to do it? It is excessively... for lack of a better word... gamey.
 
Not even dead Hitler stops driving me mad. I know that the way I killed him it's gamey. Too much coincidence, too much absurd (an awful version's of Beckett's "Waiting for a bullet"... er... Godot). I killed him in that way for that very reason. It's done the way (bad or worse) I wanted and I'm not going to change it. I do not even regret it.

Gentlemen, there's a new chapter on the previous page. I suggest you kindly to focus on commenting that section and forget the Bohemian corporal, please. Let's focus on that, I repeat, please. I know it's boring and it's politics, but, hey, it's life.

Let's forget Adolf, please.
 
Last edited:
Can't wait to see how the peace will unfold. I would also like more focus on India, please :D
 
Can't wait to see how the peace will unfold. I would also like more focus on India, please :D

I think it's standard for him to be killed around here too.
 
Not the most cheerful of updates, but then a stunning redemption at the end;

"I'm planning a little massacre among the British political class."

A phrase to make the heart leap, such possibilities...
 
With the Great War now over, I wonder if American voters will reward Teddy by increasing the number of Congressional Republicans in the upcoming November 1918 midterm election. Hopefully a certain Republican from Oregon will win.
 
Chapter eighty-three: A revolution and its ghost.

ScreenSave736.jpg

The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk caused a breach between the Bolsheviks and the Left Socialist Revolutionaries, who left the coalition. It also managed to alienate the non-Bolshevik left and enraged the rightist whites. Their army, under the command of General Anton I. Denikin, was now a fine fighting force, though small in numbers. Meanwhile the Western Allies were completely devoted in their final Big Push that was to bring final victory over Germany to do anything about Russia. Only Japan did act when, on April 5 1918, Imperial forces landed at Vladivostokl. For a while, Russia lay forgotten.

In the late summer the Communists' hastily reorganized armed forces, the Red Army, recovered most of eastern European Russia. This prompted the reaction of the Allies: at Omsk, the centre of the anti-Communists, a new army was hastily trained under the command of Admiral Aleksandr V. Kolchak, with the assistance of British and U.S. military missions. Meanwhile British forces landed at Murmansk to protect the Allied matériel stockpiled there. In August further British forces landed at Arkhangelsk for the same reasons, and the Japanese reinforced their forces in the Far Eastern territories of Russia.

In Omsk relations between the Socialist Revolutionaries and Kolchak steadily deteriorated. Kolchak and his officers disliked the left-wing views of the politicians, as for them Socialist Revolutionaries and Communists were all "Reds" and enemies. The conflict came became a mute question when, by late 1918, the Red Army invaded Ukraine, forcing the Socialist Revolutionaries and the Ukrainian nationalist forces to retreat westward. In mid-November 1918 some mixed forces under French command landed at Odessa and Sevastopol, and in the next months at Kherson and Nikolayev, but they remained isolated there, unable to advance.

The Allied governments now had to decide on their policy in the confused Russian situation. Russian exiles argued that, since the pre-Bolshevik governments of Russia had remained loyal to the Allies, the Allies were bound to help them. To this moral argument was added the political opinion that the Communist regime in Moscow was a menace to the whole of Europe, with its subversive propaganda and its determination to spread revolution.

ScreenSave7302.jpg

After a long and bloody war, just minds in London were up for another conflict. Later on they were to regret this decision

At the beginning of 1919 the French, U.S. and Italian governments favoured strong support (in the form of munitions and supplies rather than in men) to the Whites, while the British government was more cautious. Direct intervention by Allied military forces was, however, on a very small scale, involving a total of perhaps 150,000 soldiers. The French in Ukraine were bewildered by the confused struggle between Russian Communists, Russian Whites, and Ukrainian nationalists, and they withdrew their forces during March 1919, having hardly fired a shot (1). The British in the Arkhangelsk and Murmansk areas did some fighting, but the northern front was of only minor importance and the last British forces were withdrawn in the early fall of 1919. The only "interventionists" who represented a real danger were the Japanese, who were concerned about their northern border, sent the largest military force, numbering about 70,000, and established themselves systematically in the Far Eastern provinces until Tokio withdrew their last forces in 1922.

In the first half of 1919 the main fighting was in the east. Kolchak advanced in the Urals and had attained his greatest success by April but the Red Army's counteroffensive forced his armies to retreat through Siberia. By the end of summer the retreat had become a rout and Kolchak fled to Vladivostok. In the late summer of 1919, Denikin's last effort seized most of Ukraine and his forces moved northward from Ukraine and from the lower Volga toward Moscow while General Yudenich advanced from Estonia to the outskirts of Petrograd. But both were defeated by Red Army counterattacks, albeit with huge causalties, among them General Semyon Budyonny, a daring Cavalry officer. Yudenich retreated then into Estonia, and Denikin was driven back from Oryol and his war ended with the evacuation of the remnants of his army, in March 1920, from Novorossiysk, although he managed to evacuate 150,000 soldiers and civilians by sea from the Crimea. This ended the Russian Civil War.

ScreenSave0.jpg

Denikin's short-lived government

Germany had been racked by food riots, strikes and both nationalist and Bolshevik agitation. Nobody was certain of the future. For a while it looked as if the revolution that had devored Russia was to spread to Germany too. However, as the news of the abdication of Wilhelm II spread and the regency and its new Chancellor, Friedrich Ebert, followed with the promised constitutional reform that would remodel Germany on a democratic basis, fears began to be tonned down, although not completely. The USPD kept insisting insisted upon the abolition of the monarchy and Ebert refused to satisfy. In fact, he demanded that the dissolution of the soldiers’ and workers’ councils which had sprung up across Germany in the last days of April, a demand which prompted strikes and demonstrations escalated.

Then, for a while, it looked as if revolution could break up in Germany. The spark took place on 4 January 1919, when the government dismissed the chief constable of Berlin, Emil Eichhorn, who was a member of the USPD, for his lack of action against the demonstrating workers. As a reaction, the USPD, the Revolutionary Stewards and the KPD calling for a demonstration to take place on the following day. To the surprise of the initiators the demonstration turned into an assembly of huge masses as, hundreds of thousands of people poured into the centre of Berlin. In the afternoon the train stations and the newspaper district with the offices of the middle-class press and the "Vorwärts" were occupied. For while it looked as if the masses were in control.

Bundesarchiv_Bild_119-1577_Revolution_in_Berlin.jpg

Here we can see some Spartakist revolutionaries in the Silesian railway station in Berlin.

However, nothing happened. The initiators failed to make use of its power and was unable to give any clear direction. Karl Liebknecht demanded the overthrow of the government while Rosa Luxemburg thought a revolt at this moment to be a catastrophe and explicitly spoke out against it. Then it dawned on them that not a single regiment stationed in Berlin supported the revolt, and most remained loyal to the Crown and the government. The masses, bored to sobs and not knowing what to do, went home.

Meawnhile Ebert had turned to the Supreme Army Command for support, which Chief of Staff General Groener duly promised on condition that the government take energetic steps to combat Bolshevism. Reluctance on the part of the army to support a socialist Chancellor was dispelled by a common commitment to maintain the monarchy and to defeat the Read menace. It was the duty of the army to defend the Kaiser to protect Germany from revolution. As the first units of the Berlin garrison began to take the streets, reinforcements kept arriving and Gustav Noske began forming anti-Bolsheviks Freikorps, Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg denounced the SPD as pawns of the Hohenzollerns. On 3rd July, with Berlin in turmoil, the army took control of the city and hard measures were applied at once. Fearing imminent execution, Liebknecht and Luxemburg had to go into hiding. A few days later the fled Berlin in disguise. The destination: Moscow.

ScreenSave1.jpg

The end of the troubles in Berlin: Troops of the Imperial Army deploys in the Wilhelmplatz and the government quarter.

A few further strikes revolts erupted all over Germany. In some states Councils Republics were proclaimed and existed, most prominently in Bavaria, Hamburg and Thuringia, even if only temporarily as they were put down by the local police before the Imperial Army or the Freikorps could act. By the end of the troubles, 29 people were killed 1,400 arrested. Among the dead were an army officer, captain Waldemar Pabst, who was shot during the storming of the Vorwärts building on July 4th, and Gustav Noske, who was shot by mistake by a patrol from the Garde-Kavallerie-Schützen-Division.

Thus vanished the danger of a Bolshevik-style government in Germany.



(1) Old habits die hard :D



@Viden: Canon, like laws, were made to be ignored, young and angry padawan.

@c0d5579: As said previously, I know it's gamey, but I wanted to do it in that way. And thank God I couldn't find a more stupid and silliest way to do it... Who better to kill Adolf? Stalin, of course...

@Milites: The British Raj? I'll try to do something about it, I promise. The Ghadar Party, Dyer, Jallianwala Bagh public gardens, Ghandi, M. N. Roy, etc...

@Faeelin: In a war with so many dead people, one more... who cares...

@El Pip: Some possibilites: the decimation of the Liberal leadership; a Stalinist-like purge of the Conservative, Laborist and Liberal leadership -but we risk having Britain being led by Scots and Irish... too ASB even for me; some few hand-picked politicians forced to bid farewell well before their time. I'm afraid I'll choose the last one. The two other options were in such fashion that they made look St. Bartholomew's Day massacre like a slightly derranged party.

@Nathan Madien: I'm planning something for the States that ranges from a trekaddictst solution (USSA!! USSA!!!) to something else, including some combination of an endless reign of the "best" US presidents (IMHO Wilson/Coolidge/Hoover/someonetocoverthisgap/Johnson/Nixon/Ford/Carter) and some real evil options. Just for you to know: dunno why, but I like McNary. I won't kill him, don't worry.
 
Last edited:
Crush the Reds!

Mind you, ITTL with the Kaiser still around the Army might have fewer political ambitions which can only be good for Democracy in the Kaiserreich.
 
Shame about Russia. Direct Intervention was necessary. You should have assumed Direct Control.
 
*Harbinger Pic*


Well, Commander Shepard is supposed to be Canadian... (voiced by Canadian in both male and female version, and Bioware is Canadian too.)
 
@Nathan Madien: I'm planning something for the States that ranges from a trekaddictst solution (USSA!! USSA!!!) to something else, including some combination of an endless reign of the "best" US presidents (IMHO Wilson/Coolidge/Hoover/someonetocoverthisgap/Johnson/Nixon/Ford/Carter) and some real evil options.

Well, given the turmoil that occurred in the US after World War One (fears about the Red Menace, race riots, the Democratic Party unable to pick a Presidential candidate who could actually win*), you certainly have room to mess the States up.



*1920: James M. Cox gets crushed by Harding
1924: John W. Davis gets crushed by Coolidge
1928: Al Smith gets crushed by Hoover
1932: The Democrats actually manage to win despite themselves
 
Last edited:
That was an amazingly brief Russian Civil War, very much a blink and you miss it affair. I was hoping for an amusing alt-Russian government of some type, there's still time though so fingers crossed.

Also was that a miss-type? Carter down as a "best" US President? I'll admit all I really know about the chap is an impression of misery, failure, incompetence and appeasement to any dictator with a secret political police force. I'm guessing there must be more to him than that, I just lack the interest in US political history to find out.
 
Also was that a miss-type? Carter down as a "best" US President? I'll admit all I really know about the chap is an impression of misery, failure, incompetence and appeasement to any dictator with a secret political police force. I'm guessing there must be more to him than that, I just lack the interest in US political history to find out.

For someone who "lack the interest in US political history to find out", you actually sum Carter's Presidency quite nicely.
 
@Viden: Canon, like laws, were made to be ignored, young and angry padawan.

@Nathan Madien: I'm planning something for the States that ranges from a trekaddictst solution (USSA!! USSA!!!) to something else, including some combination of an endless reign of the "best" US presidents (IMHO Wilson/Coolidge/Hoover/someonetocoverthisgap/Johnson/Nixon/Ford/Carter) and some real evil options. Just for you to know: dunno why, but I like McNary. I won't kill him, don't worry.

Dark side is strong in me... :mad: :D

BTW, Garner could be the guy for the gap.
 
For someone who "lack the interest in US political history to find out", you actually sum Carter's Presidency quite nicely.
Given the number of people who seem to still listen to him even though he's an ex-President I'd always assumed there must be more to him than that. Clearly not, which is alarming - does the man have no shame at all?
 
I'd always assumed there must be more to him than that. Clearly not
He made it legal for Americans to make their own beer at home - something which had been banned during the Prohibition years, and no government until he came along had ever got round to legalising it again. (Possibly due to lobbying by the big brewery companies?) :nods:

He also did other stuff like negotiate a lasting peace treaty between Israel and Egypt, won the Nobel Peace Prize, set up a foundation to eradicate certain tropical diseases, campaigned for greater democracy and human rights in the third world, and so on. He's probably done more good as an ex-President than he ever did as President.
 
Well, Russia, say hello to another hundred odd years of oppression and tyranny.