well the frosty's and Jakalo's voice echoes the reason of my orginal refusall to become their personal little sicilian chewtoy
Its not our fault everything you touch gets invaded at the first possible opportunity.
well the frosty's and Jakalo's voice echoes the reason of my orginal refusall to become their personal little sicilian chewtoy
Well, this is all very interesting...but wasn't this primarily meant as an AAR thread??
Well, this is all very interesting...but wasn't this primarily meant as an AAR thread??
Golle, noone ever made a ruling on wheter the "anonymious future chinese player" is going to get to play China or not. Himself, you and others seem to think that it's already set-in-stone.
Anyways, resources, there are quite a few valid points for different arguments. I think the only thing I can currently agree to is reducing the amount of recources available in HoI. It's a game about warfare, not a game about building IC for 2/3rds of the game. We should try to keep it that way.
About Italy: KoM offered to released southern Italy if a player is found. If we can squeeze in another player, that'd probably be the best spot.
Edit: Damn you! Now you made me post stuff like that in our AAR thread! Meanies!
King of Men's previous words on the topic were that previous game veterans get a priority for RoTW picks, also calculated are things like contributions (cough my EU3->Vic2 converter, Dan's tentative Asian scenario for him in Mexico) as its unfair for us to make these kinds of efforts and commitments and not get some kind of assurance that we get our preferred spots along with noticed and recognized game commitment (subbing, forumtalk, aars), etc.
While it may be a bit arrogant of me to be completely certain of me and Dano's future positions in EU3 it is fairly reasonable to assume that these picks are very much probable, since Dano has been to my knowledge reassured that he will get Mexico barring catastrophe despite not subbing in CK and only been in one Great Game from only EU3 you can see how confidence in a certain possibility is well... probable.
Now as for IC growth I disagree, I think the option for economic growth should remain, unless were willing to disable the ability to produce IC and turn on full IC takeover this was a period where both resource extraction and economic growth both surged ahead significantly and I think it completely unrealistic to deny that, the point is we should be figuring out a way to allow for such growth to be sustainable regardless of where you are.
Here's an AAR for you:
At some point in time, somewhere in the world, intriguing things happened.
There was lots of head scratching, face touching and mustache twiddling.
Great things came from this.
Worth an proper mupdate?
Gentlemen, this is a CK thread, and meant for AARs not game development. We have a perfectly cromulent HoI discussion at Ederon; please take China, HoI, IC, and non-game personalities to there.
Sid, in honor of the release of your newest game, I think you should play as Sukothai - itself the newest addition to the countries listed in the Civilization games. Personally, I'm disappointed that the Mongols were not included, so I would suggest Dan play as the Mongol Khanate.
well let us pick our nations, and then we can make the china discussion behind the curtains and propose you (KoM) a workable outcome that all the asian players agree... It's a best bargain for this issue, a solem plea...
well let us pick our nations, and then we can make the china discussion behind the curtains and propose you (KoM) a workable outcome that all the asian players agree... It's a best bargain for this issue, a solem plea...