There's also a rule against taking primary titles from rulers with vassals. Maybe that's the one?
There's also a rule against taking primary titles from rulers with vassals. Maybe that's the one?
Conversions show Bavarians are the new Mordor, ominous music plays when Fivoin enters room!
Looks much better, don't you think ^^?
How can KoM be so rich? All he holds is Anatolia and Greece!
* He starts out at war so the AI immediately institutes war taxes.
* All his land is contiguous;
Why should this matter?
Nay.
While there was some confusion immediately after I yoinked the title, no land I did not myself occupy ended up in my realm. The few vassals that followed the king title were treated as still AI and forcevassalized by the other players. The rule pohibits taking land others occupy, no such land ended up in my realm.
For players, Italy was ruled AI.
KoM stated that the rule exists for AI nations as well as player nations during the session.
Rules said:You cannot take another player's primary title in a war if that player has any vassals.
KoM stated that the rule exists for AI nations as well as player nations during the session.
I did, but I shouldn't have. Checking the rules post again, it's clear that this applies only to players. Frosty still ought not to have peaced so that the Imperial vassals ended up in his realm, but as he points out, we simply considered them still part of the HRE and annexed accordingly.
From this point on the Holy Land of Crom shall be the protector of Pope and the Papacy.
The French Pagans had better convince him of giving up on this "Crusade" business then! *Rattles sabres*
Are the Fatimids now #1? How standeth the basetax and relative MP etc?
Persia and Bavaria are certainly up there to. As for myself I have suffered from 3 sessions at war with Italy followed by excommunication, succession chrisis, realm duress, and as a result field little over 300.000
Considering you have no enemies left to threaten you, 300,000 isn't too bad, is it?