Questions to the Developers

**Descri** · 23-06-2012 20:39

Originally Posted by vanin

Argument? All I was saying was that the Magna Mundi team's map would have looked like a heap of pixels like the first EU3 map does if they hadn't got the new renderer. If you argue that fact you are just stupid.

Never mind that the Magna Mundi team most likely sacrificed their own game when they decided that the map would be prioritized to the degree it was. I don't know about you but I'd rather suffer through the apparently bad Paradox maps (CK2 and Rome say hello, btw) if the game was in a state good enough for release, which it isn't. It's all about what you prioritize I suppose, gameplay over flashy graphics.

The map without the new renderer was still better than HTTT's, and even better in a lot of aspects than DW's. And Paradox's games were never complete at release, EU3 is a good example of a still incomplete game whose developer's don't what it's supposed to be. It might have some fun elements but vanilla doesn't use a quarter of it's potential.
I'm not saying the MM devs did everything right, just that EU3 was released as an inferior game only due to timing and the power of it's developers. Under different circumstances, MM would've been released at any state.