It will cost us a voter, ofcourse we object...
More seriously, if Kaisermuffin really wants to do this, why not?
More seriously, if Kaisermuffin really wants to do this, why not?
So that would we: "Kaiser Muffin I, Emperor of Germany"
It's fine by us, but do remember that all political bonds have to be severed, you will have to remain completely politically neutral.
Like me...
So all you can do is roleplay as some powerless leader, are you willing to take this honorable position?
And everyone, are there any real objections?
"I did it, I killed Wilhelm II! Now I am the Kaiser!" - Muffin
My second act as Kaiser. I name Hax duke of Schleswig Holstein!
My first act as Kaiser. I dance with appropriate royal decorum.
Do not forget your former party .
Have you guys ever considered that the Leftists were being funded by the Internationale without the Leftists even knowing? It's a possiblity. Maybe the Internationale hate our guts for our compromising positions and support for the democratic order, but want a casus belli that doesn't involve them claiming German territory. So they fund The Left, in the hopes that reactionaries would find out and suppress the German Syndies, giving the French Syndies the chance to intervene.
Further, while Syriana may have been in favor of territoral compromise, he does not speak for all Leftists. I for one will not support handing over an inch of German territory.
Furthermore, Syriana himself is know for his rhetorical flip-flopping. For example, I asked about the ABNB and The Weltreich's policies towards French territorial claims. Syriana said this before the election
Now Syriana advocates handing over German territory, after the election. But before, the UGSA implied that the MERE presence of a Syndicalist government was enough to keep France happy and get them to stop their claims on German territory. It's clear now that Syriana was attempting to pull a fast one over me, and by extension, the Left. If Syriana had revealed his true beliefs on our territory, I would not have voted for the UGSA. It is possible other Leftists would agree. So, don't ever think that the German left will let France take our territory, and don't let Syriana speak for us.
And why do you automatically assume these governments are democratic? What if they rig elections, or engage in "oppression", perhaps the very same security measures that you've been considering? Of course, there are many wrongs that the Internationale has done, no question about that. But there may have been some "justified" rebellions too. We can't just tar all rebellions in one brush as being "evil".
Funded is not the same as involvement. It is possible the Internationale may have merely sought to fund our organizations merely as a way to undermine them in the eyes of Germany.
The way to deal with this issue is to have all members of The Left refuse to accept foreign funding, but it is fair that other parties should have to accept the same conditions.
And what happened after the 1936 election? Where's all the violence and terrorism in Germany? Remember, there was a chance for the Left to wage and sponsor an revolution within Germany. Instead, there were revolutions everywhere BUT Germany. Maybe there is an exception to our movement, as our leftist parties are not connected to radicalism.
The Haxists however do a history of violence, look at their actual profile of their party:
"The National-Climate Radicals are mostly known for their continued spree of terror bombing against what they see as 'evil corporate pollution conservative communazi entreprises of DOOM!'. Aside from that, the NCRP pushes for a radical conservative-liberal agenade with a heavy emphasis on nationalism and militarism, because, and I quote party leader Hax 'Germany is the gretezt ntion in the wurlds n we should liek kill all them inferiooors lololololol!'"
And yet, no restriction or monitoring, even when the NCRP committed actual terror attacks?
You've been repeating the refrain that just because the Internationale funded the Left, the Left must be controlled by the Internationale, when the reality may not be the case. I suppose you need to drive the point home though.
Maybe, but let's see if the investigation can be non-partisan. Invite some moderate Syndicalists on board too, so the radical Syndicalists don't accuse the investigation of being a "witch hunt".
Also, looking back at the Cabinet, it seems that only one member is proposing a Loyalty Oath (yourworstnightmare), and luckily, nobody is accepting them, so I revoke the No Confidence Vote. My bad. Sorry for the accusations C_c.
(I need to talk to TRP about that. A party that actively sponsors and admits that it engages in terrorism shouldn't be allowed in a democratic election. There is something inherently, terribly wrong with that. Once I get a reply back, as he is the gamemaster, I will type up an appropriate reply.)
Duke of Schleswig Holstein, Count of The Palatinate.KaiserMuffin so what ranks do I have?
Wow, Servant, I am truly impressed.
Your investigation is both interesting and amusing, and should receive an award on it's own, for it is the most nonsensical thing I have read for the past 6 says.
I applaud you, Servant, for your faint attempt at manipulating the mass, if only realpolitik had more members like you.
Carry on,
-Laurence
What...the...fuck...
TRP, is this true, a Bolshevik plot, or a poor joke?
So it's nonsense then?
Your investigation is both interesting and amusing, and should receive an award on it's own, for it is the most nonsensical thing I have read for the past 6 says.