Can you give me a link to this??
Here you go:
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=10309086&postcount=362
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/showpost.php?p=10309089&postcount=363
Can you give me a link to this??
My idea is that decisions should be shared and agreed. If you think I should remove them I will do it. My opinion is that those teams are still valid but they are a second best. This means that their presence is not crucial but it could be useful if a player wants 2 slots at the same time. In that case the player will pay a penalty because the old teams are less efficient. Please let me know your opinion because I will act accordingly.
Its a picture of a soviet yakovlevut2. I was thinking; Mongolia got aircraft from the soviets. Why not use a old picture of a soviet plane that would be "plausible" for Mongolia to use. I also tried to find a better picture but I did not find so much.
Never mind the chemistry I was thinking laud. Bomber Tactics and mechanics sounds fine to me.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_of_Mongolia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolian_People's_Army
Exactly my thought. One does not need many doctrine teams. Aircraft, infantry, tank, navy can use parallel research. Land doctrines rarely so.And I have never seen where you would need to use more then 2 Land Doctrine teams at any given time.
608;Georg Trapp;T_AUS_Georg_Trapp;4;1930;1947;centrali[B]s[/B]ed_execution;naval_training;seamanship;small_taskforce_tactics;submarine_tactic;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
for a couple of days I need your help for making checks, polishing and testing. could you please ensure your availability?
Well, to even use Kubena or Rendulic they would already have to be using the other two. And I have never seen where you would need to use more then 2 Land Doctrine teams at any given time. I don't think they will be missed or I wouldn't have suggested their removal (I would have tweaked them, Kubena would probably be a skill 2 and Rendulic a 3, they were nothing special).
Exactly my thought. One does not need many doctrine teams. Aircraft, infantry, tank, navy can use parallel research. Land doctrines rarely so.
Albania
H.W. Egli Bull and Compagnie des Machines Bull have the same picture. Beware of the different specilities
Belgium
Why does Vicker-Armstrong show up everywhere as the same line? Australia, SAF, Belgium??? Wasn't it british?
Remove them. von Mauser said that historically they are not a good fit.
Also please note that I'm updating my most 3 above for problems in the files.
In the next patches theese has to be amended. Even countries not producing any of their own aircrafts had repair facilities which could represent theri tech teams. No need for fantasy/other country teams.It's the same company which grew.
Because; I guees, Belgium had not the capacity of developing/researching/building any aircraft but its aviation was not that bad. I would keep the team but lower the skill.
Albania
CZE
Komárom Naval yar misses its picture. Copy over from SLO
The danube flottila could have the new picture I sent yesterday.
Pics for AIVA, AERO and Letov are probably wrong. Emil Janouska had this awful picture?
IRQ
I don't see Iraq airforce implemented
Lux
Usine: eihter industrial_engineering or technical_efficiency. Not industrial_efficinecy
SOV
Nevskoye Design Bureau picture is not so nice.
VIC
H.W. Egli Bull and Compagnie des Machines Bull have the same picture. Beware of the different specilities
I see Jean Romatet picture in the file, does this mean you will implement him as the TT I suggested?
608;Georg Trapp;T_AUS_Georg_Trapp;4;1930;1947;centralised_execution;naval_training;seamanship;small_taskforce_tactics;submarine_tactic;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
608;Georg Trapp;T_AUS_Georg_Trapp;4;1930;1947;centralized_execution;naval_training;seamanship;small_taskforce_tactics;submarine_tactics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
609;GÖCH-Gesellschaft Österreichischer Chemike;T_AUS_GOCH;4;1930;1970;chemistry;industrial_engineering;management;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
609;GÖCH-Gesellschaft Österreichischer Chemiker;T_AUS_GOCH;4;1930;1970;chemistry;industrial_engineering;management;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
614;Korneuburg Werft AG;T_AUS_Korneuburg_Werft;2;1930;1970;naval_engineering;naval_artillery;electronics;technical_efficiency;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
614;Korneuburg Werft;T_AUS_Korneuburg_Werft;2;1930;1970;naval_engineering;naval_artillery;electronics;technical_efficiency;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
619;Österreichischen Luftstreitkräfte;T_AUS_Österreichische_Luftstreitkräfte;3;1930;1970;piloting;aircraft_testing;fighter_tactics;aeronautics;training;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
619;Österreichischen Luftstreitkräfte;T_AUS_Österreichischen_Luftstreitkräfte;3;1930;1970;piloting;aircraft_testing;fighter_tactics;aeronautics;training;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
622;Puch;T_AUS_Puch;5;1930;1970;general_equipment;training;mechanics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
8501;Emile Speller;T_LUX_Emile_Speller;3;1930;1952;training;decentralised_execution;infantry_focus;small_unit_tactics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
8501;Emile Speller;T_LUX_Emile_Speller;3;1930;1952;training;decentralized_execution;infantry_focus;small_unit_tactics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
8502;Félix de Bourbon-Parme;T_LUX_Felix_de_Bourbon-Parme;2;1945;1970;centralised_execution;infantry_focus;small_unit_tactics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
8502;Félix de Bourbon-Parme;T_LUX_Felix_de_Bourbon-Parme;2;1945;1970;centralized_execution;infantry_focus;small_unit_tactics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
8505;SOLA - Société Luxembourgeoise d'Armes;T_LUX_SOLA;4;1952;1970;general_equipment;industrial_engineering;artillery;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
8505;SOLA-Société Luxembourgeoise d'Armes;T_LUX_SOLA;4;1952;1970;general_equipment;industrial_engineering;artillery;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
8506;Usine de Rodange;T_LUX_UsinedeRodange;5;1930;1970;industrial_efficiency;chemistry;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
8506;Usine de Rodange;T_LUX_UsinedeRodange;5;1930;1970;industrial_engineering;chemistry;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
This will add the correctly named photo. I also still think start should be moved to 1945 like the Army...
Also, for Both Nations there are some photos in the file that arn't needed or used anymore. I can point them out if needed.
For LUX I can rename the vanilla photos if liked, so they have real names.
Between 1918 and 1921, the Austrian semi-regular army was called Volkswehr ("People's Defence"), and fought against Yugoslavian army units occupying parts of Carinthia. It has been known as "Bundesheer" since then, except when Austria was a part of Nazi Germany (1938-1945; see Anschluss). The Austrian Army did develop a defense plan in 1938 against Germany, but politics prevented it from being implemented.
Regarding Bundesheer:
Between 1918 and 1921, the Austrian semi-regular army was called Volkswehr ("People's Defence"), and fought against Yugoslavian army units occupying parts of Carinthia. It has been known as "Bundesheer" since then, except when Austria was a part of Nazi Germany (1938-1945; see Anschluss). The Austrian Army did develop a defense plan in 1938 against Germany, but politics prevented it from being implemented.
Source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_Armed_Forces
Please do it.
2500;Akers Mekaniske Verksted;T_NOR_Akers;5;1930;1970;naval_engineering;technical_efficiency;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2501;Atle Selberg;T_NOR_Selberg;6;1943;1950;mathematics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
#IMAGE SOURCE: Mathematisches Institut Oberwolfach (MFO), http://owpdb.mfo.de/detail?photoID=3792, Author Konrad Jacobs, Erlangen, licencse: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/de/deed.en
2502;Borregaard;T_NOR_Borregaard;3;1930;1970;chemistry;mechanics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2503;Carl Gustav Fleischer;T2505;4;1930;1970;decentralized_execution;infantry_focus;small_unit_tactics;training;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
#250x;Christiania Spigerverk;T_NOR_ChristianiaSpigerverk;3;1930;1970;general_equipment;mechanics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2504;Den Kongelige Norske Marine;T2507;4;1930;1970;centralized_execution;naval_engineering;naval_training;seamanship;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2505;Elektrisk Bureau;T_NOR_ElektriskBureau;3;1930;1970;electronics;mechanics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2506;Elkem;T_NOR_Elkem;3;1930;1970;chemistry;mechanics;technical_efficiency;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2507;Forsvarets Forskningsinstitutt;T_NOR_FFI;5;1946;1970;chemistry;combined_arms_focus;electronics;management;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2508;Framnæs Mekaniske Værksted;T_NOR_Famnaes;4;1930;1970;electronics;naval_engineering;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2509;Hærens flyvevæsen;T2506;3;1930;1944;aircraft_testing;bomber_tactics;combined_arms_focus;piloting;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2510;Horten Verft;T2500;4;1930;1970;naval_artillery;naval_engineering;technical_efficiency;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2511;Institutt for Atomenergi;T_NOR_InstituttforAtomenergi;6;1946;1970;chemistry;nuclear_engineering;nuclear_physics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2512;Kjeller Flyfabrikk;T2501;3;1930;1970;aeronautics;chemistry;technical_efficiency;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2513;Kongsberg Vaapenfabrikk;T2502;4;1930;1970;artillery;general_equipment;technical_efficiency;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2514;Kværner;T2503;5;1930;1970;industrial_engineering;management;technical_efficiency;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2515;Luftforsvaret;T_NOR_Luftforsvaret;4;1944;1970;aircraft_testing;centralized_execution;fighter_tactics;piloting;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2516;Norges Tekniske Høgskole;T_NOR_NorgesTekniskeHogskole;4;1930;1970;electronics;chemistry;industrial_engineering;nuclear_engineering;nuclear_physics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2517;Norsk Hydro;T_NOR_NorskHydro;5;1930;1970;chemistry;management;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2518;Marinens Flyvebaatfabrikk;T_NOR_MarinensFlyvebåtfabrikk;3;1930;1970;aeronautics;electronics;technical_efficiency;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2519;Marinens Flyvevåben;T_NOR_MarinensFly;3;1930;1944;aircraft_testing;centralized_execution;fighter_tactics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
#IMAGE SOURCE: http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fil:Northrop_N-3PB_in_flight.jpg
2520;Odd Hassel;T2508;5;1930;1970;chemistry;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2521;Raufoss Ammunisjonsfabrikk;T2504;5;1930;1970;artillery;general_equipment;mechanics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2522;Strømmens Værksted;T_NOR_StrommensVaerksted;4;1930;1970;mechanics;technical_efficiency;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
#IMAGE SOURCE: Wilse, Anders Beer / Norsk Folkemuseum (Norwegian Museum of Cultural History), found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Strømmens_Værksted_building_wooden_train_cars.jpeg
2523;Tandbergs Radiofabrikk;T_NOR_Vebjorn_Tandberg;5;1933;1970;electronics;management;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
2524;Thoralf Skolem;T_NOR_Skolem;5;1930;1963;mathematics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
#IMAGE SOURCE: http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Biographies/Skolem.html
#25xx;Det Kongelige Frederiks Universitet;T_NOR_KongeligeUniversitet;5;1930;1939;chemistry;mathematics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;x
#25xx;Universitetet i Oslo;T_NOR_KongeligeUniversitet;5;1939;1970;chemistry;mathematics;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
The plan was developed Alfred Jansa, one of the TT's I suggested.
Changes: Images
NOTE: I do not know
(A) If the logos of elkem or borregaard was used in the period 1930-1970
(B) If their logos are in the public domain or not