Age of Timur

[Austen]

I think your flag of England should be this to begin with, then become the flag of St. George when you revert to the normal England/France arms.

Obviously you should find a better quality image than that, though : ]

(By the way, is there even an event to change the flag and shield? I can't find it)

Austen

[marionette]

hi nice mod but need update (soon?) and more flags,some pplz have no gfx

[Garbon]

Here's the current list of recent updates:

Age of Timur

v1.2
---------------

--Bugfixes--
*Corrected a few outstanding issues with the help of Jamie550's validator
*Fixed typo in ID number for "Council of Constance" event

--Events--
*Added events for Poland
*Added several events for Bohemia, Hungary and Poland regarding the end of the Piast dynasty in Poland
*Added more HYW events for England and France

--Graphics--
*Added shieldset for Moravia

--Scenarios--
*Lowered starting relations between Austria and Hungary; Serbia and Hungary in 1337
*Lowered starting relations between Pskov and Novogord in 1337 to represent Pskov's independent policies
*Added military alliance between Bohemia, Hungary and Poland in 1337
*Made Croatia independent again in 1337 to represent Hungary's tenuous grasp on the region
*Greatly revamped starting vassalizations and royal marriages in 1337 as most were holdovers from 1399 scenario
*Lowered stability and added revoltrisk for Norway in 1337 to represent nobles frustrated with Magnus
*Nivernais to Flanders in 1337
*Languedoc to Mallorca in 1337 as Montpellier wasn't pawned to France until 1349
*Added Armagnac as French vassal in 1337

--Misc--
*Removed legacy file "timur_events.txt"
*Re-numbered events and implemented standard format
*Removed Bavaria's electoral vote

[raistlincl]

Can you update the attachment to v1.2? I downloaded v1.11 from the 1st post, some of the flags are still missing in 1337 scenario. Thank you very much!

[Garbon]

Oh I haven't released it yet, but it'll be in the first post when I do.

[raistlincl]

Thanks! Looking forward to that. :-)

[marionette]

hi enjoying 1.2

oh no not coz not released in nearly a year

[Garbon]

hi enjoying 1.2
oh no not coz not released in nearly a year

Do you think such comments are constructive in any way?

[ConjurerDragon]

Here's the current list of recent updates:

Age of Timur

v1.2
---------------

--Bugfixes--
*Corrected a few outstanding issues with the help of Jamie550's validator
*Fixed typo in ID number for "Council of Constance" event

--Events--
*Added events for Poland
*Added several events for Bohemia, Hungary and Poland regarding the end of the Piast dynasty in Poland
*Added more HYW events for England and France

--Graphics--
*Added shieldset for Moravia

--Scenarios--
*Lowered starting relations between Austria and Hungary; Serbia and Hungary in 1337
*Lowered starting relations between Pskov and Novogord in 1337 to represent Pskov's independent policies
*Added military alliance between Bohemia, Hungary and Poland in 1337
*Made Croatia independent again in 1337 to represent Hungary's tenuous grasp on the region
*Greatly revamped starting vassalizations and royal marriages in 1337 as most were holdovers from 1399 scenario
*Lowered stability and added revoltrisk for Norway in 1337 to represent nobles frustrated with Magnus
*Nivernais to Flanders in 1337
*Languedoc to Mallorca in 1337 as Montpellier wasn't pawned to France until 1349
*Added Armagnac as French vassal in 1337

--Misc--
*Removed legacy file "timur_events.txt"
*Re-numbered events and implemented standard format
*Removed Bavaria's electoral vote

I downloaded the 1.11 version and after extracting it into the game folder I noticed that I have two 1399 scenarios. One named "Age of Timur" and the other "His Jugdements revealed". Is there a difference or can one be deleted? Or should I have deleted the entire FtG_Timur folder before extracting the 1.11 version?

In both 1399 scenarios Byzantium has a lot of cores it should not have - I guess you copied them from the Ottomans? Because they got exactly the same cores, e.g. on Hungary, Cilli and even Podolia.

[Garbon]

I downloaded the 1.11 version and after extracting it into the game folder I noticed that I have two 1399 scenarios. One named "Age of Timur" and the other "His Jugdements revealed". Is there a difference or can one be deleted? Or should I have deleted the entire FtG_Timur folder before extracting the 1.11 version?

Same but I would get rid of "Age of Timur". Renamed the scenario file to fit in line with the additional scenarios that were added.

In both 1399 scenarios Byzantium has a lot of cores it should not have - I guess you copied them from the Ottomans? Because they got exactly the same cores, e.g. on Hungary, Cilli and even Podolia.

Entirely possible.

[Garbon]

As new stuff has not yet been forthcoming (), uploaded old changes. v1.12 now available in first post.

[ConjurerDragon]

As new stuff has not yet been forthcoming (), uploaded old changes. v1.12 now available in first post.

After unzipping the rar file into my mod folder I noticed this:

the mod_FTG_Timur.txt file only contains

#The Age of Timur

#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

mod = {
name = "The Age of Timur"
dir = "FTG_Timur"
language = { "english" }
style = { "classic" }
remark = "For FTG by Garbon"
}

#-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and no info on the version of the mod.

After unzipping the file and starting FTG with the AoT mod when I click on the first two scenarios I see the description of the coat of arms for England, France, Lithuania and blue Horde (1337) or in 1369 the same except Lithuania - but I don´t see the coat of arms of those nations. The other nations in the two first scenarios have their CoA displayed correct. And when clicking on the 1399 scenario all coats of arms are displayed.

[Pied-Noir]

He has not included any EGUFSM stuff, so you will have a lot of missing GFX unless you use classic.

[Garbon]

He has not included any EGUFSM stuff, so you will have a lot of missing GFX unless you use classic.

I'll change that for the next release so that one doesn't have the option of selecting the shieldset (like how classic shields are forced in Great Migrations).

[Garbon]

and no info on the version of the mod.

Oh that's because I've never note that superfluous line as something worth changing. I believe that the AGCEEP's file still references 1.57.

[ConjurerDragon]

He has not included any EGUFSM stuff, so you will have a lot of missing GFX unless you use classic.

You´re right, when I start FTG and Age of Timur and change shields to classic in the settings than all shields are displayed correct.

[ConjurerDragon]

Byzanz still has the wrong (seemingly ottoman) cores in all 3 scenarios.

e.g. 1337 scenario:

nationalprovinces = { 
      	 296 297 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 352 353 354  355 356  357 358 359 360 361  362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369  470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 490 491 492 493 494  742 743 744 745 746 747  820  1609 1610 1611 } 

 claimedprovinces = {
	320 321 355 356 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 742 743 744 745 746 747	# non-greek former posessions of Byzanz 
	}

I have nothing against more cores for Byzanz in scenarios before 1419. However those cores it currently has are areas Byzanz either never ruled
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:B...e_animated.gif
or lost more than a century ago.
I suggest to remove all cores north of the danube river and to change all non-greek cores that were lost to claims instead in all 3 scenarios.

Edit: Trebizond has the same cores as Byzanz in the 1337 scenario and should be changed like Byzanz.

Another edit: Brittany has cores on all of France in the 1337 scenario and should probably have only cores on the provinces of Brittany.

Yet another edit: In the 1369 scenario KARAMAN has the same cores as Byzanz. So they have cores all over Egypt, the middle east and hungary - but none on their neighbouring province of Antalya and Adana... ^^ Karaman should not have any cores outside Asia Minor.

AYDIN in 1369 has yet again the same cores and should have only cores on itself and it´s neighbouring provinces.

ARMENIA MINOR in 1369 has yet again the same cores and should probably only have cores on itself and the provinces located between itself and the one province with armenian culture.

ERITNID in 1369 has yet again the same cores. If it´s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eretna
then it should probably only have cores on the eastern part of Asia Minor and should have mongol as primary state culture.


I noticed that provinces with uzbek and khazak culture are present in all 3 scenarios. In AGCEEP those provinces start as tatar and are changed to uzbek with an event when the Uzbeks become independant from the golden horde and later some to Khazahk when those split from the Uzbeks. Don´t you intend to use those events to show how the Uzbeks broke from the Horde and later the Khazaks from the Uzbeks and both were before one people?

[Garbon]

Byzanz still has the wrong (seemingly ottoman) cores in all 3 scenarios.

e.g. 1337 scenario:

nationalprovinces = { 
      	 296 297 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 352 353 354  355 356  357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 490 491 492 493 494 742 743 744 745 746 747 820  1609 1610 1611 } 

 claimedprovinces = {
	320 321 355 356	# non-greek former posessions of Byzanz 
	}

I have nothing against more cores for Byzanz in scenarios before 1419. However those cores it currently has are areas Byzanz either never ruled
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:B...e_animated.gif
or lost more than a century ago.
I suggest to remove all cores north of the danube river and to change all non-greek cores to claims instead.

Still wasn't updated. Will do!

[ConjurerDragon]

Still wasn't updated. Will do!

Updated my post 57.

Austria/HAB should not have czech/slovak/magyar culture in scenarios before 1419.
However they should perhaps have a claim on the swiss province of Zürich (they lost Thurgau only 1460
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thurgau
and Aargau 1415
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aargau
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...te_CH_1315.png
to the Swiss

#(1340-1420) Calais, An English bridgehead
event = {
	id = 105513
	trigger = {
		owned = { province = 382 data = -1 }
                control = { province = 382 data = -1 }
	              }
	random = no
	country = ENG

	name = "Calais, An English bridgehead"
	desc = "The great victory of Crecy gave to Edward III the time to besiege and conquer the port of Calais : despite a courageous resistance, townsmen didn't receive any help from Philippe VI, now afraid to risk his crown in another battle, and were forced to capitulate during the well-known event of the 'six bourgeois'. Edward was merciful with the citizens, but he forced them to evacuate the town - they will be taken in charge by the King of France. Edward installed here a colony of merchants and other english people, and forced sea trade between England and the continent to have a scale at Calais, in order to receive more taxes. For more than 200 years, Calais will become an english-bridgehead in France."

	date = { year = 1340 }
	offset = 30
	deathdate = { year = 1420 }

	action_a = {
		name = "Make Calais our stronghold in France"
		command = { type = provinceculture which = 382 value = anglosaxon }
		command = { type = addcore_national which = 382 }
		command = { type = population which = -2 value = -1000 }
		command = { type = population which = 382 value = -3000 }
		command = { type = provincetax which = 382 value = 5 }
		command = { type = fortress which = 382 value = 1 }
		command = { type = cash value = -250 }
		command = { type = vp value = 50 }
	}
	action_b = {
		name = "Too expensive!"
		command = { type = population which = 382 value = -4000 }
	}
}

Calais should not only be owned but controlled too.

[Pied-Noir]

Can someone explain this to me?

#(1345) The Hungarian Invasion of Naples
event = {
	id = 119001
	trigger = {
		war = { country = NAP country = HUN }
		monarch = 16124 #Giovanna I
		OR = {
			owned = { province = 406 data = -1 } #Provence
			AND = {
				owned = { province = 395 data = -1 } #Messina
				owned = { province = 396 data = -1 } #Sicily
			}
		}
		NOT = { 
			countrysize = 10 
			relation = { country = HUN data = 100 }
		}
	}
	random = no
	country = NAP
	name = ""
	desc = ""

	date = { day = 12 month = september year = 1345 }
	offset = 5
	deathdate = { day = 29 month = december year = 1345  }

	action_a = {
		trigger = {
			owned = { province = 406 data = -1 } #Provence
		}
		name = "Plot our return in Provence!"
		command = { type = capital which = 406 }
		command = { type = relation which = HUN value = -100 }
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HUN value = 393 } #Napoli
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HUN value = 394 } #Apulia
	}
	action_b = {
		trigger = {
			AND = {
				owned = { province = 395 data = -1 } #Messina
				owned = { province = 396 data = -1 } #Sicily
			}
		}
		name = "Plot our return in Sicily!"
		command = { type = capital which = 396 }
		command = { type = relation which = HUN value = -100 }
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HUN value = 393 } #Napoli
		command = { type = cedeprovince which = HUN value = 394 } #Apulia
	}
}

How can you have triggers on the actions? How do they work and what do they do?

And what is the use of 'countrysize = 10' as a trigger for Naples? How is she ever going to acquire ten provinces?