Interesting to see : Leviathan is mentioning multiple american powers..but only one is feeling sufficiently hit to answer...:rofl:
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Interesting to see : Leviathan is mentioning multiple american powers..but only one is feeling sufficiently hit to answer...:rofl:
Well.. that is also assuming the same level of trickleback (the hospital research) the same amount of losses (quite a lot of things go into that!), and a few other things (manpower minister? extra manpower from research?).
I wouldn't bet on him being totally OUT of manpower....But he might be building an airforce, or some navy/submarines, too. They are more IC intensive, and less manpowerintensive..
That's because everyone already knows that Italy is too fuzzy and cuddly to ever backstab anyoneInteresting to see : Leviathan is mentioning multiple american powers..but only one is feeling sufficiently hit to answer...:rofl:
Ignoring, in diginified silence, the discussion of assumed-consent kidney donations, I would instead like to remark that if China's manpower statistics are accurate - 2500 to 1700 in 1.3 years - then he has either been building a lot of divisions or been taking a hell of a casualty rate, or both. That's 80 divisions' worth of manpower.
Actually checking the save I started with 1400 manpower and yet now I have 1800-1900 DESPITE building alarge number of divisions and costly attacks.
Awesome!
Imagine the moral dillemma to the one who gots his hands first on the Nukes...doing the world a favor and burn few million chinese?....or exresise the ultimate cyper-space fantasy there is, blow up the Italopolis:rofl:
I actually find that a stupid idea not because its effective but because its kinda ungainly and cheap and kinda exploity, in real life such armies would get their assed kicked by american/german styled armies relying on suporior firepower, that doesnt always happen here.
But you CAN put in a few militias in every corps..they will soak some hits, and save you some MP, because they are cheaper to reinforce. Only note their speed, and make sure your total unit is still better than opponent..
Why put in Militia when infantry work better? I have the IC, the only thing I cant gaurantee is oil.
I have written for myself a prediction about how this game will turn out. However, I will not post it until it either has come to pass or until the prediction becomes so far off the game you guys play that it can not happen anymore. This to prevent a self-fullfilling prophecy. I promise to post it eventually though
I promise to post it eventually though
nah just post it, I doupt it can do us much harm...as afterall most part of the Game takes place in PMs and in MSN in anyway which isen't presented here anyways, so Im always curious to see what outsiders think they know about us
And besides, can there be any harm of self-serving prophecies? I mean when Elcyion got it in harms ways he did say that "why focus on him, France will still eventually eat out anyone in europe."
And besides, can there be any harm of self-serving prophecies? I mean when Elcyion got it in harms ways he did say that "why focus on him, France will still eventually eat out anyone in europe."
Yes, Inf works better. But if you do not have enough IC and/or MP, that can be a more efficient use of a limited resource..Of course you should have enough of both..