For INF, you could do the same thing that WiF did, add brigades that make it roughly the equivalant of MOT. Yes, this would make them unable to have another brigade attachment, but that is the players choice.
For INF, you could do the same thing that WiF did, add brigades that make it roughly the equivalant of MOT. Yes, this would make them unable to have another brigade attachment, but that is the players choice.
The latter if you ask me. Eitherway is good though. Don't be afraid to make a decisionyeah thought about that but did not found any proper soultion. also what should happen if you hit that button. goes the unit to the pool/production queue or just magicly changes its appearences like this would work as an upgrade?
The divisions were not converted because they were heavily damaged. They were converted because they were in Germany, and they were in Germany to reorganize and reform because they were heavily damaged.I don't think I've been ridiculling anything. I knew that W-SS divisions were changed all the time but I was under the impression that such things happened when those divisions were badly damaged.
No idea, but I don't see how that's relevant. It happened in Germany, and it should be perfectly possible.Did other nations transform Mechanized divisions into armored divisions?
So why the initial opposition? I'd even go as far as saying the conversion from MEC to ARM should be easier than from MOT to MEC (doctrine and training wise, not with regards to equipment) since MEC and ARM fight much in the same way, while MOT fights like INF with MEC fighting completely different.Ofcourse there is a sort of logic in transforming a MEC into a ARM as an ARM division usually is a mechanized Regiment with 2 armored regiments and things like that.
The divisions were not converted because they were heavily damaged. They were converted because they were in Germany, and they were in Germany to reorganize and reform because they were heavily damaged.
No idea, but I don't see how that's relevant. It happened in Germany, and it should be perfectly possible.
So why the initial opposition? I'd even go as far as saying the conversion from MEC to ARM should be easier than from MOT to MEC (doctrine and training wise, not with regards to equipment) since MEC and ARM fight much in the same way, while MOT fights like INF with MEC fighting completely different.
True up to a point. You could for example use 1 of those regiments, break it up, and form the core of 2 new regiments of a new division. Not in-game of course, too difficult to simulate, but just saying this to show you that a conversion in real life would be possible, and indeed beneficial, even if the unit is at full strength.Nevertheless, if you change the make-up of a division from 3 regiments (hypothatically speaking ofcourse) of Mechanized infantry to 1 Regiment of Mechanised infantry and 2 Regiments of tanks it's more logically to do so with a division that only has a regiment of mechanized infantry left
I disagree. It was possible, and it makes sense, so it should be an option. Using the same logic as your argument here, you could argue nukes shouldn't be in the game, because only the US used them. Same for marine divisions, super heavy tanks, etc...It's a bit silly to make a game-function that was only used by one country isn't it?
No problem.Well I am a pain the butt for one
That and I had posted before I thought it through
But that way doctrines and such send the combat stats way out of whack.
INF-MOT-MEC and CAV-MEC is the best.
It's a bit silly to make a game-function that was only used by one country isn't it?
More like Japans submarine aircraft carriers.You mean, like nukes?
Light Tank to Medium Tank is possible as well.The problem is, that you cant really say where to upgrade to. So if you want a Inf39 upgrade to Inf41 or to Mot39? I think it would of course be nice to have that ingame, but i think it would be incredible hard to programm something like that with a proper selection for users.
More like Japans submarine aircraft carriers.
ive added now an upgrading issue to the queue which contains
the implementation of an upgrade button for LArm to Arm and from Mil to Inf.
Cav-Mot-Mec cycle is way too complicated at the moment, maybe it gets in some day, but im promising nothing and i stick to that.