A small note from a guy who didn't vote for this project
- Thread starter Fredrik II
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
You voted for Crusader Kings 2, didn't you? C'mon, you can admit it.
We must have it, precioussss.... we neeedddssss it....
We must have it, precioussss.... we neeedddssss it....
Very nice, I'll buy it on release even if my pc doesn't run it yet...
I also would recommend looking at the consumer eyecandy megathread, and possibly give some feedback, since that whole thread is brainstorming about ways to make the game more marketable, and thus, more profitable.
I also would recommend looking at the consumer eyecandy megathread, and possibly give some feedback, since that whole thread is brainstorming about ways to make the game more marketable, and thus, more profitable.
Never heard of the game, but now I'm getting it. I predict I will be cut off from Fredrik's head 
You should see him bald, I know what it's like. It's hilarious.
You should see him bald, I know what it's like. It's hilarious.
I vote for big moustache, big beard and shaved head :rofl: . I will buy 5 copies if you promise that
Fredrik: You're screwed Oh you're going to regret this... I'm buying two copies to see that this happens.
Oh you're going to regret this... I'm buying two copies to see that this happens.
Out of curiosity, Victoria may have had a horrible launch, but how as it done after launch? Does it still sell okay on Gamersgate compared to other older projects like (the Holy Grail) Crusader Kings?
I think I remember hearing something like that about some of Stardocks games? That they don't have huge launches like the big AAA titles, but they sell steadily over much, much longer periods of time, and they're still very profitable because of that.
I think I remember hearing something like that about some of Stardocks games? That they don't have huge launches like the big AAA titles, but they sell steadily over much, much longer periods of time, and they're still very profitable because of that.
In order to save your hair you just have to make sure that new players will be discouraged by the lack of any possibility of learning this game quickly, e.g. by not including a proper manual or tutorial and thus making the game intransparent, just like the first Victoria.
In order to save your hair you just have to make sure that new players will be discouraged by the lack of any possibility of learning this game quickly, e.g. by not including a proper manual or tutorial and thus making the game intransparent, just like the first Victoria.
I learnt how to play this game as it was supposed to be played via the manual, what on earth are you talking about? I read it one afternoon and understood everything I had not understood so far.
No, it absolutely must have a really good, interactive tutorial, which actually runs you through the functions. Its too complex a game not to have one.
Of course with the tutorial. I was talking regarding the manual. And please no narrative tutorial as in HoI3. It was fun, for the first 10 minutes...
Same here - I bought the GG version and I can't be fecked with .pdf manuals.
I look forward to seeing the bald, misshapen head of Paradox's CEO.
(I'm sure it's only misshapen due to the massive cerebellum)
Also, how could you vote against destiny? For shame!!!
(I'm sure it's only misshapen due to the massive cerebellum)
Also, how could you vote against destiny? For shame!!!
I do like the head of government & head of state ideas. Even if it is just like in Hearts of Iron where all there is is a name that does not seem to mean anything it would help imersion and make the game more educational (as long as it changes when it should, if France still has Louise Philipe by 1923 that would be a problem. Although I would prefer a Hearts of Iron II picture as well as that leader providing + prestige or something like that.
- Status