That would probably be custom made events that change ownership of the provinces.What about the Anschluss of Austria and Countries having a civil war like Spain and China?
That would probably be custom made events that change ownership of the provinces.What about the Anschluss of Austria and Countries having a civil war like Spain and China?
all good news, but I still think the peace negotiation system is an april joke...
My bet the middle one is related to land warfare.These icons will indicate how many hits on the national unity the country is taking. First one is indicating the hits form the strategic bombing, the second one- form the attacks on the convoys. The middle one is maybe the combined value, or indicates the intelligence and political hits.
WWII is an all out war against idealogies.
None of them would surrender without the bomb.
Bold mine.There are ways to do this.
Finland, twice.
Germany was completely conquered. So what's your point?
That is total conquest.
Can you imagine choosing all those extra provinces in a peace negotiation? They added over 10,000 extra provinces.
Now what the hell was the name of that province? Where is it agin on the scroll? What provinces is the AI refering to when they offer a peace agreement?
Are you smart enough to remember all those names and where they are located?
If there were regions it would be different.
...Strategic warfare, we already mentioned that strategic warfare can be used to lower national unity. It is now perfectly feasible to bomb Rotterdam and induce the Dutch to surrender. Basically uncontested strategic warfare will lower national unity. Note with the surrender logic being what it is bombing a country that still holds all its provinces (say like bombing Ploesti in Romania) won’t actually make the country surrender, you still need troops on the ground. However it will make the country become more vulnerable to surrender, meaning it won’t hold on as long once things start to go bad. Basically strategic warfare sort of works like this, each successful attack reduces national unity, each defence increases national unity.
My bet the middle one is related to land warfare.
So it could be something like the amount of enemy troops in your country compared to yours (including your allies), and/or something that factors the control of the territory.
Or even it could be tied to the amount of IC controlled by the enemy, it's the strategic par of the warfare after all.
Does strategic warfare consist of more than just bombing (e.g. naval blockades, where appropriate)? Because if it involves nothing more than just a [conventional] bombing campaign, it would be fairly ahistorical.
The Allies were mistaken in believing that bombing Germany around the clock would force a popular uprising in Germany, only to be proven wrong as the people continued to persevere. Germany believed the same thing in the Battle of Britain, but the British had their 'finest hour'. The US had to resort not to one, but two atomic weapons before the Japanese finally capitulated.
I'm all for gameplay, but not at the expense of history altogether.
So what happens if a country breaks another one within the same faction? I assume you mean factions as communists, fascists etc and not the alliances themselves. I guess an austrian goverment wouldnt go to Berlin if Germany decided to do it the hard wayIt is based at the capital of the faction leader.
If they are overseas then you need to take them one by one.