Perhaps it would be wiser to suspect the people who were online, but were not participating in the vote switching?
Perhaps it would be wiser to suspect the people who were online, but were not participating in the vote switching?
Personally I suspect Cuth for three reasons:
1) He voted vLN the Bad late .. common packmate tactic when it seems obvious that packmate is going down, as it gives you an "alibi" -- not too significant by itself, but better than random vote when I voted very early previous day expecting not to be online much during the rest of the day -- note that also Euro the Bad voted vLN late
2) However, I find it even more curious that Cuth was defending Euro and Heimdall right after deadline -- especially since Euro was actually bad
3) And then Euro took significant part in saving Cuth yesterday
--
So IMHO we have to either scan or lynch Cuth, because of the circumstantial evidence is so much against him. And unless we've got a running JL, lynching is the only option.
If Cuth is good, it makes a number of other people less suspicious, while if Cuth is bad, Heimdall should be lynched immediately after.
Your case on Cuthulluthingy is indeed interesting.
Villagers gotta use their brains, you know.
So IMHO we have to either scan or lynch Cuth, because of the circumstantial evidence is so much against him. And unless we've got a running JL, lynching is the only option.
If Cuth is good, it makes a number of other people less suspicious, while if Cuth is bad, Heimdall should be lynched immediately after.
But he claimed to be an (important ?) goodie. Usually we would just let him be scanned, no? And as I said lynching him for voting a baddie is still bad play IMO.
Couple of points:
- Both Euro and vLN mk. 2 claimed to be important goodies ... and see what happened
- Baddies routinely vote each other and use that as "evidence" for their goodness ... while it's no evidence at all as generally only other baddies know who baddies are, while villagers routinely vote for other people than baddies, because they don't know better
Ah, so the fact that I have had a major hand in getting both baddies lynched makes me more suspicious, I get it. ..
I think it interesting you pointed to Cuthuthulu, while humancalculator voted right after him.
And in the quoted post I voted by the final votes ... so I missed HC's vote as he switched not too long after.
Even though I was already thinking you were innocent it is nice to know the reason you omited humancalculator. Else I might have come back to it later in the game
I remembered one of my other suspects: Avernite. Though I vaguely remember that Avernite was not my best suspect, but he is the one I can remember So though luck for him. The reason was that he was apparently online as indicated by his post after deadline, but stayed out of the pre-deadline discussion.
Vote Avernite