Though Giorgi seems quite competent, his Martial rating does not bode well for your situation...
demokratickid: I like to think the game doesn’t really begin until 1080 or so since that’s when the leader I molded since childhood usually comes around.
All the more reason to adopt consanguinity or elective lawThat's true. In most of my games, it ends up being some scheziophrenic, hunchb-backed, 1/1/1/1 guy who lives until he's 80 despite how many sicknesses he gets or how many times I put his life in danger... GRRR!
Pardon my rant...
That's true. In most of my games, it ends up being some scheziophrenic, hunchb-backed, 1/1/1/1 guy who lives until he's 80 despite how many sicknesses he gets or how many times I put his life in danger... GRRR!
Pardon my rant...
An interesting AAR thus far, I enjoy AARs over obscure eastern nations, I feel that the game is more exciting that way.
But as for the above rant, the best way to solve that is to change the inheritance law to the strongest son, and then to prevent the Martial 12, 1 1 1 1 schizophrenic son from inheriting, save a special title for the "Heir apparent" (usually a county or two + a ducal titles) and give it to the one you want to inherit; if a better one comes up byzantine (cheat) + remove the tag and give it to the better candidate. Since it falls under role-playing, it really isn't cheating, and the loss of loyalty from vassals could represent distrust in a monarch who cannot make up his mind.
This especially works well in situations like Lithuania, Castile, Navarre, and Georgia where there is a Kingly title by that name and and ducal title with the same title.