Nukeface said:
I think this is a good idea - rather like the "tradition" variable in EU3.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I think this is a good idea - rather like the "tradition" variable in EU3.
King said:
A very good philosophy!
I hope you use this all the time when creating new features
I like the new approach with production having an impact on research, will have a nice impact on gameplay. (even though I can imagine it'll be hard on Japan with its meager industry.
Can't say I like the hex-like provinces, but I suppose the shear number of them will make up for it. Wish the map had a bit more colour though.
(even though I can imagine it'll be hard on Japan with its meager industry. Can't say I like the hex-like provinces, but I suppose the shear number of them will make up for it. Wish the map had a bit more colour though.
Sounds good.
I too like the philosophy of using positive reinforcement instead of negative.
I too like the philosophy of using positive reinforcement instead of negative.
Can anyone explain the 6 bottons on the top left?
1. Province Infos
2. Land battles
3. Air battles
4. Naval battles
5. ??
6. ??
1. Province Infos
2. Land battles
3. Air battles
4. Naval battles
5. ??
6. ??
Cpack said:
I think it is
1. Province info
2. Land units
3. Air units
4. Naval units
5. Don't know
6. Don't know either
5. Airbases/ports/forts?Veldmaarschalk said:
6. Strategic redeployment
I think. :S
The efficiency idea, especially linked to research is great. I hope you get the balance right so that it really pays to develop a mixed military compared to building just a few unit types and then switching later when you need something else.
As for the map, it looks pretty good. I guess the city names can be changed easily so they don't matter. I like the province-region setup. That will make combat much more interesting.
I hope you get the balance right so that it really pays to develop a mixed military compared to building just a few unit types and then switching later when you need something else. As for the map, it looks pretty good. I guess the city names can be changed easily so they don't matter. I like the province-region setup. That will make combat much more interesting.
Placeholders. One will be manpower, the other maybe TC or diplomacy or prestige or whatever.BUBBLE Monster said:
As it should be. After all, historically their tanks were hopeless.Geroshabu said:
The increased provinces on the map will bring a hex-y... no I said hex-y not sexy feel to the warfare component. At least I hope so and can see how fighting battles is going to be that much more enjoyable and frustruating.... in a good way!
feel to the warfare component. At least I hope so and can see how fighting battles is going to be that much more enjoyable and frustruating.... in a good way!
Last edited:
Registered said:
Hopefully this system will also mean that it takes a year or two for the USA to hit full pace in war production and research.
Wonderful, hopefully this will prevent Germany from stopping building some tanks and churning out 10 carriers!
Can't wait till next week!
Can't wait till next week!
Good indeed! Awesome~!
However, I am still worring about the economy of the minor nations. In HoI2, there is no way to have Armoured unit for the minor. I think that there should be way to get the tanks, airplanes whether the type of 100% strength division or 50% strength.
Maybe the international market is better (But if it is my unconsiousness, I am sorry about it.)
However, I am still worring about the economy of the minor nations. In HoI2, there is no way to have Armoured unit for the minor. I think that there should be way to get the tanks, airplanes whether the type of 100% strength division or 50% strength.
Maybe the international market is better (But if it is my unconsiousness, I am sorry about it.)