sbr said:I didn't say how easy it was, I said it was the easy part of this AAR.
Ah, I see. Point well taken.
By the way, Remble, what are you going to do about Tibet?
sbr said:I didn't say how easy it was, I said it was the easy part of this AAR.
Mangudai said:The Americans are keeping Breslau because it was the main site of the German nuclear weapons program. Maybe here, they weren't smart enough to create fission at will, so they need to get som "inspiration and advice" from the Germans?
Originally posted by Elias Tarfarius:
3. Amphibious landing in Burma/India - I think troop movements and the rebasing of the navy point to this action. Seems like a good indeed for cutting of the Brits in Bruma quickly.
Originally posted by Sokraates:
“Take that, Japan! Communism rulez! China FTW!!!”
Mangudai said:Yeah, if Hu Jintao was a communist.
Mangudai said:Communist Party of China's doctrine is Communism: false.
The Communist party in China has just gone ahead with too many compromises for me to call them communist. Socialist is a more relaxing term.
Porkman said:Socialist is too strong as well. The better term in is free market authoritarian. All that's left of the "socialist" system are some failing state run industries. They still have the inefficient and bloated bureaucracy of a socialist state, but they don't actually provide any of the public services that other socialist states give (inefficiency not withstanding).
Free Healthcare? No.
Guaranteed Employment? Not anymore.
Pension funds? Sorry about that.
Environmental protection? Thats' just funny.
It's just gotten to the point where the government is just run for the benefit of corporate interests.