This just keeps getting better and better!
What will that 'Distance from capital' feature (from the first pic) affect/do?
This just keeps getting better and better!
What will that 'Distance from capital' feature (from the first pic) affect/do?

Some costs and time to travel.
For the Glory: A Europa Universalis Game
Go to FTG forum!
AGCEEP High Council Member
AGCEEP Website
Relisez les couplets IX et XI de la Marseillaise
Hm, I just realized it's just a tooltip, it's nothing newOriginally Posted by YodaMaster
![]()
ah, its just a debug tooltip that i have always on when i testOriginally Posted by ZmajOgnjeniVuk
![]()
Sweet.![]()
A History of Baden- Will Bernard I von Baden-Baden and his wife Anna von Oettingen lead Baden to victory or disaster?
Nominated for the Weekly AAR Showcase, 9/25/06!/ Nominated for Best Character Writer of the Week, 10/29/06!/ Winner, Favorite History-Book AAR, EU1/2, Q3 2006!
"And the dream would grow ever grander and more wonderful, and the higher it reached towards the impossible, the more beguiling it became."--Emile Zola
That's just not very convincing.Originally Posted by berhaven
1. By that logic, I better scuttle my ships before they have the chance to be captured by my opponents too, and choose -1 tax base whenever I can in an event on the off chance that my opponent will capture the province.
2. If you remove a Cot, you are encouraging neighbours to create their own, since all cots will have more trade in them. Unless, of course, you want to move your Cot. Say as Netherlands you conquer vlaandern, you could possibly want to close it and reopen it in Holland.
3. Wait for it? Get direct taxes on a +10 tax base provinces?
4. Why would you do that? Keeping it gives you +10 tax base. That's alot.
5. This is the only one that makes a bit of sence, really. But I'd just keep the province and the cot.
Question to Johan - What about colonial Cots? You won't be able to create them if you already have a Cot back home, is that WAD? Or will you just keep the colonial cots opening like they do now?
I hope we will not default to "mourning" over all previous rulers.(especially if they suck)
We are coming tonight. You will come out from inside. Prepare yourselves from tonight. We will find you in your closets.
Make it cheaper to maintain a monopoly on your CoTs.Originally Posted by Featauril
FE: closing down colonial CoTs except those only you, and maybe a couple others, know about.
Best WW Death Ever as Eliria the Very Mean Girl in WWLite XXXII: My Super Sweet Sixteen
CK: DV Mod - Horde & Timurid Empire Mod v2.5
CK: DV Mod (Computable with DVIP) - Automated Courtier Education Events v3.03.01
If it's seriously stunting the growth of your current CoT with a core on it already, yes it makes perfect sense. For the next 50 years you'll likely just be handing your trade income from those provinces away...Originally Posted by Featauril
Best WW Death Ever as Eliria the Very Mean Girl in WWLite XXXII: My Super Sweet Sixteen
CK: DV Mod - Horde & Timurid Empire Mod v2.5
CK: DV Mod (Computable with DVIP) - Automated Courtier Education Events v3.03.01
I see a possible exploit to the CoT system, an example. I am playing Tuscany, having also conquered the pity states there and the Kingdom of Sicily. Since Tuscany is generally trading, my monthly income should be roughly 35 or more. Now I am able to mint for a couple of years and, for the cost of roughly 1,5 manufactories, open 3 new CoTs, stealing trade from Liguria, Venice and maybe Thrace. Increasing my income by 60 (monthly taxes + census)
I fear that since everybody will want to maximise their tax income the world will be dotted by a large number of <400 valued CoTs, making the income earned by a single merchant very little.




just curious, but does the CoT bonus to Tax also decrease the chance for a successful religious conversion, or is that based solely on base tax value.Originally Posted by berhaven
I like the CoT option, though I hope the AI wont be too crazy with it. Some stability in CoTs is desirable, and i remember find EU2's later patches "dynamic" CoTs to be an hassle more than a fix.
Regarding royal marriages, I assume theyll still be possible to strengthen relations and as a step up to diploannexation even while using historical monarchs, right? What about converting your historical ruler to a general, will that work?








about the distance to capital:
I think you should add that as a concept or something like it. Maybe if distance to capital is very far away=increase chance of revolt. Just think that if the americans weren't so far away from great britian if the US would be here today.
IIRC, they said that if your ruler was a general then he shall be one, if not, he shall be not.Originally Posted by Alerias
What about converting your historical ruler to a general, will that work?
EU3 Save Suite - your one stop shop for everything related to EU3 savegames.
Think you're the best EU3 player? Check out the EU3 Hall of Fame
Dealt: A polish colonel deals his last hand
The Swiss Account: The average documentation of the stereotypical Swiss.
"Cheese ages better than women but money is forever." - Davout
EU3 Hurt and Heal Archive
You coudn't open 3 new cots. You can't open a cot in a province that is sending it's trade to a cot you own.Originally Posted by Ar7
You would open your first cot, all italy would trade to it, and then you woudn't be able to open any more in italy or nearby.
Even if that wasn't the case, you can't create a cot from a cot that's worth less then 300 ducats, so after the first cot, between the three cots in italy there woudn't be much trade left in italy.
1. I was thinking of a war not going too well. It is a nice option to leave a less actractive province.Originally Posted by Featauril
2. Not necessarely: province reallocation could open the chance to place a better suited COT.
3. While you wait 25 years you get a worldwide heavy penalty on trade: the balance with the +10 tax could be positive or not.
4. Again, if we're talking about Antwerp or Venice in early game, you're probably right, but there can be situations (Tahiti, or Mauritius) when you do not want to be obliged to invest heavily to defend a province just because you have a poor COT in it.
Nemo propheta in Patria
YAY ! THANK YOU JOHAN ! YOU MADE MY DAY !
I was DYING to know how we'd be able to create or close COTs !![]()
Man that IS good !
VIVE LE QUÉBEC LIBRE !
«Votre empire est une vieille catin habituée à se faire violer par tout le monde [...] Vous oubliez que la France est victorieuse» (Napoléon aux plénipotentiaires autrichiens)
That CoT feature is a really good addition. I never liked that London or so don't have a CoT and there is nothing you can do about it.
Very few of us realise with conviction the intensely unusual, unstable, complicated, unreliable, temporary nature of the economic organisation by which Western Europe has lived for the last half century. We assume some of the most peculiar and temporary of our late advantages as natural, permanent, and to be depended on, and we lay our plans accordingly. On this sandy and false foundation we scheme for social improvement and dress our political platforms, pursue our animosities and particular ambitions, and feel ourselves with enough margin in hand to foster, not assuage, civil conflict in the European family. Moved by insane delusion and reckless self-regard, the German people overturned the foundations on which we all lived and built.
John M. Keynes, 1919
I hope you historicalists are happy now. Anyway, that CoT thing must be the best news since... the announcement of Deus Vult.![]()
Well, the chances of one of your provinces NOT trading with your own CoT is extremely small unless you own 100's of provinces. So, yeah, you can get one CoT...Originally Posted by Ar7