Vann the Red: Thank you, I'm pleased I did so well.
Nikolai: Thank you.
Eams: Well, after I lost Aleppo and had all my cities occupied a happy ending seemed odd somehow.
o
ComradeOm: Thank you very much.
RGB: The sheer number of underage rulers... :wacko: At one point I had three kings in three years!
VILenin: One of the problem I had was that Garcia had no brothers and sisters left. It felt wrong handing out thrones to non-family members so I was stuck with too big an empire until too late (I certainly would have given Italy to a younger brother or sister, and maybe Mesopotamia too).
Specialist290: True, true.
And I've a little more to say about the ring below.
coz1: Than you.
I glad you enjoyed the story of the ring. I saw it as a symbol, both of the Kingdom of Aleppo and the family itself. García was the last
true King of Aleppo and the last Prince of Antioch, and his downfall saw the close of a chapter that had begun with the first Bohemund. Ambition had made the de Poitou's the most powerful family in Christendom; ambition had ruined them: García's father and elder brother died in wars to extend their territory, leaving the kingdom to an infant. Ambition was both a blessing and a curse to the family.
It was the nobles however who did the deed; in their own blind ambition and greed they destroyed the kingdom itself - and themselves in the process. Of the great Dukes who had attended the coronation of 1430, practically none survived to see the fall of Baghdad. They fought the Crown, they fought themselves and in the end they ended up with... what? I doubt 'King' Vincenzo of Aleppo will last long against the Eastern Emperor.
Like the Regicides of King García they caused the loss of both the prize they wanted so dearly and of their own souls.
That, at any rate, is how I saw it.