TheArchduke said:
Nope, it does not. If that is to happen then we have to put all events that is avoided in a "gamey way" under that list, in order to be fair.
And i dont like that idea.
TheArchduke said:
If Spain avoids getting them in the first place and someone else gets them, fine. (Although then the other power should get the event anyway.
)
I think ****** created a new event for this, that makes the event more realistic with the new map. Perhaps we should include this one in our game?
I know some other events that shouldnt exist, or be changed atleast.
Like the Danish german culture event, the Polish inflation hit event over Prussia and some others. Perhaps we should add our own event file for this game, to get those idiotic events changed.
If it is possible that is,
thoughts?
TheArchduke said:
Wouldn´t mind to have some ahistorical colonizations once in awhile anyway.
Do we have random leaders, meaning Denmark, Sweden, Poland, Austria, Ottoman Empire, Brandenburg and Venice having a shot at explorers, too?
We havn't discussed anything regarding random leaders yet, but for the games sake we should add explorers and conquistadores to everyone really. The colonial setup is hugh on this map
But i still belive that Portugal-France-England-Spain should have the first advantage, this can be solved with that random explorers will be generated for the others after 1550s or something.
juv95hrn said:
I don't quite follow the logic of distribution of gree CB's through shield placement on "human" nations capitals? It seems this has been done in some cases but not all? Whats the situation regarding this?
We will do like we did in BF3, edit in perm CBs on all human played nations.
No cores.