Sarmatia1871 said:And can we also have Svarog - the improved version of the Tsar Tank, equipped with battleship guns, infantry-crushing wheels and massive flamethrowers?!?
Oh, that sounds good!!!!!!!!
Sarmatia1871 said:And can we also have Svarog - the improved version of the Tsar Tank, equipped with battleship guns, infantry-crushing wheels and massive flamethrowers?!?
T-hiddemen said:Oh, that sounds good!!!!!!!!
Sarmatia1871 said:Oh yes, just remembered - can someone attempt to locate some pictures (even better if they're converted into event image format!) of the following:
* Chinese officials (preferably dodgy looking)
* Chinese militias/gangs (criminal/semi-criminal)
* Chinese labour demonstrations
* Impoverished Chinese peasants
* Oriental port and street scenes
Etc.....
T-hiddemen said:Hi Sarmy
I redid the two events I posted earlier (added the shadows) and made a few more. They are in this ZIP FILE
CCurio said:O yeah, I had an idea...
How about splitting engineer brigades into three diffrent types...?
1) Movement engineers - Give movement/river crossing bonuses. Essentially bridging units and such
2) Sappers/Assault engineers - Flamethrowers, satchel charges and tunneling equipment. Fort attack bonus, attack values bonus
3) Defensive engineers - Give assorted defence bonii plus small attack bonuses
Perhaps also replacing other of the rocket artillery brigades with heavy artillery...?
Juancho said:What do you think about this:
BB's
[/URL][/IMG]
BC's
.
Sarmatia1871 said:I think I'm planning on having a Chilean-Argentinian war against Bolivia at some point, and Brazil is going to be a potential major player, getting a choice of which global faction it's going to align with.
A restoration of Grancolumbia might be an idea, as I haven't really found anything interesting to do with Venzuala, Peru, Columbia or Ecuador. So any suggestions with these (particularly on the domestic policy front, which is what I generally want to deal with first) will be greatly appreciated!
T-hiddemen said:1st, I personally like BC's, fast, maneuveurable, firepower, etc, but in vanilla they are worthless. Unless you change things, savvy players will probably not build them. After reading some naval strategy I build never build BC or CL anymore.
Second, my pride and joy, the Wotan, was designed off Bismarck/Tirpitz blueprints, but is bigger, more heavily armored and armed and with more engine capacity (possibly nuclear, though that might be Wotan II class )
I would hate to see this class relegated to an obsolete class. I was hoping that this would be then end of the line for BB, 8 or 9 . . .
lifeless said:what about Pu Yi for the Qing empire.
...
note:the last 2 were warlords so im not sure if they have a place in the mod but i posted them up here anyway
Juancho said:The main reason I think naval tecks need a change is because BC's aren't what I think they were supose to be, They all should have longer range, be faster and more manuverable that BB's, so they would be a real reason to build such ship,
Wotan would actually be the biggest, more expensive, most deadly, have the longest firing range of any BB's and they would be able to take a lot of beating, It would require a masive air attack to sink them, they would be the ultimate design, they could be used until well into the 70's, 8 & 9 BB's would be faster, longer cruising range, lower visibility, and higger seadetection. If we could upgrade ships like in HOI 1 we could keep the seadetection as hi as it should be (I would always keep my best ships with the best radar techs) and fit them with a couple of missiles, but we can't, if you like I coud move it to the 8 or 9, but that would only change the way the AI would build them.
Sorry my mistake 5 BB should be early 30's, and the Wotan should be 1938-1940 and giving GER an event where you can please your admiralty add 4 to build quenue and get blueprints for it, please army and get army stuff but get no BB's, or please noone and get 1 or 2 and bits of army.
How about it? interested?
J.A.
Eddit: I have the KMS Wotan on my desktop, I hope you don't mind, I just love it.
Juancho said:Ok, regarding South American events and set up, what ever happens to the USA during it's civil war will determine what will happen in South America, but most important,please correct me if I'm wong.
...
The reason I stress so much in La Paz desintegration is because it would be very dificult to keep such a union in South America. without any posible friccion.
Hope you all understand what I wrote, excuse my long post. Hope it helps
T-hiddemen said:Ok, the Tsar's tank plus a new heavier main gun in a central armored turret, to quadruple flak turrets ala Wirbelwind, and of course the flame thrower in action
...
Not necessarily a bad idea, but I'll have to check how much engineering technology actually developed during WWII and such...I would have to poke around (maybe check out HoI I techtree... )Juancho said:That sounds good but what about having only 2.
both would get river crossing bonuses, and unlike vanilla both should have more that one model. So what about keeping 2 & 3, both having small attach/defence bonus, 2 would get extra attach and oil comsumtion(sp?), and 3 exactly as you say, pepending on a doctrine on with one you would get.
We have 13 brigades other brigades, some we can just put a couple more models, but other brigade we could change a lot, SHtanks >>Infantry support tanks, AC>>recon batalions, Sp rocket art>>Heavy arty. I beleve that the Kaiserreich need a wider tech range, there will be a bunch of local wars, betwen countries that werent realy that advanced, so there's room for having 20's inf div fighting a 30's inf divs in a lot of places like South America and asia.[/IMG]
Gen.Schuermann said:erm, regarding the land battleships - this remains a joke, right? i read somewhere (need to look for that!) that the sovs actually tried to build such things, with mutiple turrets, katyushas and so on. they actualy built like 4 of them, but they were amazingly useless. 3 of them were destroyed during a test (2 fell on their side while firing, one burned itself while testing katyushas) and the other one i think saw battle but destroyed itself while firing, as well : D
But wasn't T-35 a "successful" land battleship? They were useless against the german tanks and only 61 were ever produced, but still they are a part of AFV-history: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-35Gen.Schuermann said:erm, regarding the land battleships - this remains a joke, right? i read somewhere (need to look for that!) that the sovs actually tried to build such things, with mutiple turrets, katyushas and so on. they actualy built like 4 of them, but they were amazingly useless. 3 of them were destroyed during a test (2 fell on their side while firing, one burned itself while testing katyushas) and the other one i think saw battle but destroyed itself while firing, as well : D