hey i have a request. Are you going to make the legistation cities playable in the next update ? Because it would be kind of cool to play as them.
Sarmatia1871 said:Excellent! Would definitely be very good, as long as I'm not need to do much stuff!
Also, one thing I think would be interesting and atmospheric would be if there was an option to change the ingame fonts into Frakturschrift, like this:
The fonts are definitely moddable (there are a few mods for Victoria, if I remember correctly...), but I'm guessing it would be quite fiddly to do.
However, if it can be done, the mod can actually have an educational value, and teach people the crucial skill of reading early modern and 19th century German documents!
JRShield said:Give it to me and i will explain what you'd wan't to know.
By the way in our national anthem is the diets tradition:
Wilhelmus van Nassouwe
Ben ick van Duytschen bloet
Duytschen means both German and Diets.
Spitfire_Pilot said:hey i have a request. Are you going to make the legistation cities playable in the next update ? Because it would be kind of cool to play as them.
TotenkopfPzD said:Any idea where I might be able to get this font added into my Microsoft Word Program? Thanks!
CCurio said:I didn't have any other name for the tech group, which indeed has the attack enemy all along to force a catastrophic failure of his defence systems, then exploit the cracks in the defence line idea...it's just bad naming.
And I have little idea on what German army was on the defence... I just thought that WWI mentalities might have stuck...
Sorry. o
Berlichingen said:With the new land doctrines, how is Mass Assaults a new school of warfare?
...
That's my take anyways.
---------------
Also, Sarmy, whats next for me to do, Austria OOB or something?
I'd reorganize the land doctrines to reflect two styles of warfare, Infantry-based and Mechanized-based, everything descendes from that. Infantry-based could be divided into firepower and static defense, with german taking the firepower-based infantry warfare, and some countries like Austria, Ottomans and Bulgaria taking static infantry warfare, etc. Mechanized warfare would lead to blitzkrieg style warfare, based on pinpointed assaults and encirclements and then the second option would be broad-ranged offensive warfare, similair to russian tactics, who used firepower and massed troops over elite mechanized units encircling and breaking through enemy lines.
PostPaintBoy said:by the way, whats the backstory behind with the legistation (sp) cities? Or Asia in general. hust curious
Spitfire_Pilot said:well for the legaslation cities, add some Chinese generals since they are located in China, but also add some colonists generals. (Sudanese generals, British Indian generals. ). For tech teams maybe add Hong Kong, Chamber of commerce, or just some old companies in Hong Kong or Shanghai. ill give u some.
Hong Kong Chamber of Commerce.
Shanghai industries
Kowloon Industries
Shekou Port
Shanghai weapon's factory.
thats all of the names that i can think of for tech teams.
lifeless said:well theres shanghai shipyards and University of Hong Kong. Are you going to do anything about the triads of Shanghai?
Juancho said:I think to change doctrines is very important, and I think this is the best way to change those doctrines, but with the addition of Infaterie adaptation or something along those lines.
As for Naval techs, I thinks BB's would have keen getting bigger and more expensive, using up more fuel and supplies. until electronics/computer, gets good enought so they start to get more efficient, and operational cots start to decrease. BC's compared with BB's should be less deadly, less protected, but faster and with a longer range, specially those designed during the 20's and early 30's.
Heavy cruisers started as the 1906-1910 Armored Cruiser AC, but were later replaced by BC's, and AFAIK were not realy build until the Washington Naval Treaty (WNT) forced all the major naval powers to limit there tonnage, so it was seem like a more eficient way to use te limited tonage. In our scenario we do not have the WNT but we have a lot of countries that could see AC's as smaller, cheaper wesels with a punch, your hope for control of the seas. They could de deployed as something that can outfight anything faster, outrun anything stronger. Ether to defend your comertial fleets, to attack your enemy's comertial fleets, or to guard your carriers, in the most progresive Naval High comands, I think Canada it's goning to have one of those.
Super heavy tanks would be my choice for inf. support tanks. Very expensive, used for breaking through tough places, land battleships, developing into medium tanks that would help inf. taking out small forts, machine gun nests. kind of how they where used in the Pasific(sp?) during WW2. So they would go from big fuel and supply users to less use, and they would get faster.
I hope everyone can understand what I wrote, those are just some Ideas, If you like them I have some more.
@ CCurio: If you want, post the effects of the doctrines and I'll give it a shoot and try to ease your burden
Edit: Added a coupple of comas(,).