The rocket technology is open again for all. Barbarossa has top priority and the next version will see Germany actually having a break in winter (the event was bugged). The Soviets will also build lots of infantry and we will see, if this is enough.Marlborough said:
Seems that :jackson63ii said:
application = { # Engineer Regiment '36
id = 2550
name = TECH_APP_ARMOR_55_NAME
desc = TECH_APP_ARMOR_55_DESC
position = { x = 441 y = 2 }
year = 1936
component = { # Early Flamethrowers
id = 2551
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_55_1_NAME
type = mechanics
difficulty = 2
}
component = { # Basic Land Mines
id = 2552
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_55_2_NAME
type = chemistry
difficulty = 2
}
component = { # Portable Military Bridge
id = 2553
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_55_3_NAME
type = general_equipment
difficulty = 2
}
component = { # Mine Clearing Equipment
id = 2554
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_55_4_NAME
type = mechanics
difficulty = 3
}
component = { # Basic satchel charge
id = 2555
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_55_5_NAME
type = artillery
difficulty = 2
}
required = { 1050 } # Was 1020 HIP 37 /1050 is Infantry Division '35
effects = {
command = { type = activate_unit_type which = engineer }
command = { type = new_model which = engineer value = 0 }
}
}
application = { # Engineer Regiment '39
id = 2560
name = TECH_APP_ARMOR_56_NAME
desc = TECH_APP_ARMOR_56_DESC
position = { x = 441 y = 18 }
year = 1939
component = { # Basic Flamethrowers
id = 2561
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_56_1_NAME
type = mechanics
difficulty = 2
}
component = { # Construction equipment
id = 2562
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_56_2_NAME
type = mechanics
difficulty = 2
}
component = { # Amphibious Crossing Equipment
id = 2563
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_56_3_NAME
type = general_equipment
difficulty = 3
}
component = { # Improved Mine Clearing Equipment
id = 2564
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_56_4_NAME
type = mechanics
difficulty = 4
}
component = { # Shaped Charge Explosives
id = 2565
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_56_5_NAME
type = artillery
difficulty = 2
}
required = { 1060 2550 } # Was 1030 in HIP 37 / 160 is Infantry '38
effects = {
command = { type = new_model which = engineer value = 1 }
command = { type = scrap_model which = engineer value = 0 }
}
}
application = { # Engineer Regiment '43
id = 2570
name = TECH_APP_ARMOR_57_NAME
desc = TECH_APP_ARMOR_57_DESC
position = { x = 441 y = 34 }
year = 1943
component = { # Improved Flamethrowers
id = 2571
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_57_1_NAME
type = mechanics
difficulty = 2
}
component = { # Improved Anti-Tank Mines
id = 2572
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_57_2_NAME
type = chemistry
difficulty = 3
}
component = { # Armored Construction Equipment
id = 2573
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_57_3_NAME
type = mechanics
difficulty = 4
}
component = { # Improved satchel and demolition explosives
id = 2574
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_57_4_NAME
type = chemistry
difficulty = 2
}
component = { # Floating bridges and mobile ferrying equipment
id = 2575
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_57_5_NAME
type = general_equipment
difficulty = 3
}
required = { 1070 2560 } # Was 1040 in HIP 37 / 1070 is Inf Div '42
effects = {
command = { type = new_model which = engineer value = 2 }
command = { type = scrap_model which = engineer value = 1 }
}
}
application = { # Engineer Regiment '47
id = 2580
name = TECH_APP_ARMOR_58_NAME
desc = TECH_APP_ARMOR_58_DESC
position = { x = 441 y = 50 }
year = 1947
component = { # Advanced Flamethrowers
id = 2581
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_58_1_NAME
type = mechanics
difficulty = 3
}
component = { # Advanced antipersonnel and antitank mines
id = 2582
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_58_2_NAME
type = chemistry
difficulty = 4
}
component = { # Improved vehicles and construction equipment
id = 2583
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_58_3_NAME
type = mechanics
difficulty = 5
}
component = { # Improved floating and mobile bridging equipment
id = 2584
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_58_4_NAME
type = general_equipment
difficulty = 4
}
component = { # Tankdozers and specialised combat engineer vehicles
id = 2585
name = TECH_CMP_ARMOR_58_5_NAME
type = mechanics
difficulty = 5
}
required = { 1090 2570 } # was 1050 in HIP 37 / 1090 is Inf Div '46
effects = {
command = { type = new_model which = engineer value = 3 }
command = { type = scrap_model which = engineer value = 2 }
}A bug, requires a non-existent tech. I will upload a fixed file, simply replace the file and you can continue saved games.jackson63ii said:
HIP uses another independent system, which is working fine. In the next version the amount of the reduction will be decreased, about cut in half.Zakouski said:
. One more requiest for US could you consider to move the Jan 1941 14% increase in spending to Jan 1940 have a trigger with that would build 2X2 of the North Carilona's, the rest figthers\bombers in a run through 1941, that would make it closer to reality. An still kept the AI from building divisions. You are really doing a great job Panther II.
) Half of the resources go to the IJN, Manchuko Army stays in Manchuria, Japanese Manchuko Garrisons stay there, Korea Gun stays in Korea, keep a Home Army of at least 8 infantry Divisions, etc.
Panther II said:
Panther II said:
This is under review, should be a bit shorter in the next version, because the Soviets attack earlier.arby2236 said:
I have seen something similar, but only once, when Germany is very slow to advance and French troops enter Belgium, then such a stalemate is possible.arby2236 said:
I "had" that view too a long time ago and was discussing that with Mithel/Starfire. The average distance between two provinces is maybe 200-300 km, when troops make that distance MANY battles are necessary, what justifies long combat. 5 hour combat and then advance 200 km at turbo speed is ridiculous. HIP will go along with Starfire on this in the future. And WW2 combat without air and armor support should be long. In HIP you can still get short combat, if you add both for your attack.arby2236 said:
Being able to defeat the Netherlands in 4 days is pointless compared to a more realistic Fall Gelb or Barbarossa combat. I am sure, that a human can do Fall Gelb in time in HIP. Poland is a bit harder, because of the VPs.arby2236 said:
Look at German losses and compare them to the WAY higher Allied losses. Germany is not too weak early on and has enough IC and technology to be powerful enough.arby2236 said:
KeldorKatarn said:
The Albatross said:
